Cargando…

Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology

STUDY DESIGN: Simulations using data from a prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate how prospective cohort data can be employed in randomized controlled trial (RCT) planning to assess feasibility and operational challenges, using TASCI (Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Collene E, Birkhäuser, Veronika, Stalder, Stephanie A, Bachmann, Lucas M, Curt, Armin, Jordan, Xavier, Leitner, Lorenz, Liechti, Martina D, Mehnert, Ulrich, Möhr, Sandra, Pannek, Jürgen, Schubert, Martin, van der Lely, Stéphanie, Kessler, Thomas M, Brinkhof, Martin WG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00588-z
_version_ 1783605287178993664
author Anderson, Collene E
Birkhäuser, Veronika
Stalder, Stephanie A
Bachmann, Lucas M
Curt, Armin
Jordan, Xavier
Leitner, Lorenz
Liechti, Martina D
Mehnert, Ulrich
Möhr, Sandra
Pannek, Jürgen
Schubert, Martin
van der Lely, Stéphanie
Kessler, Thomas M
Brinkhof, Martin WG
author_facet Anderson, Collene E
Birkhäuser, Veronika
Stalder, Stephanie A
Bachmann, Lucas M
Curt, Armin
Jordan, Xavier
Leitner, Lorenz
Liechti, Martina D
Mehnert, Ulrich
Möhr, Sandra
Pannek, Jürgen
Schubert, Martin
van der Lely, Stéphanie
Kessler, Thomas M
Brinkhof, Martin WG
author_sort Anderson, Collene E
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Simulations using data from a prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate how prospective cohort data can be employed in randomized controlled trial (RCT) planning to assess feasibility and operational challenges, using TASCI (Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injury to prevent neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a nationwide randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial) as a case study. SETTING: Spinal cord injury rehabilitation centers in Switzerland. METHODS: TASCI is nested in the multicenter Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI), which prospectively includes patients with acute spinal cord injury. In simulations, data from 640 patients, collected by SwiSCI, were used to investigate different scenarios of patient eligibility and study consent, as well as the performance of the randomization list. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the population of interest and the simulation results; multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of discharge within the TASCI intervention time period. RESULTS: The recruitment target of 114 patients is obtainable within the originally envisioned three-year time period under the most favorable recruitment scenario examined. The distribution of the primary prognostic factor produced imbalance in the randomization lists and informed further discussion of the cut-off values used in stratification. Influxes of patients resulted in overlapping intervention periods for multiple participants, which guided resource allocation. Early discharge was related to the primary prognostic factor and study center, but is only anticipated in about 8% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective cohort data are a very valuable resource for planning RCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7611589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76115892021-08-30 Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology Anderson, Collene E Birkhäuser, Veronika Stalder, Stephanie A Bachmann, Lucas M Curt, Armin Jordan, Xavier Leitner, Lorenz Liechti, Martina D Mehnert, Ulrich Möhr, Sandra Pannek, Jürgen Schubert, Martin van der Lely, Stéphanie Kessler, Thomas M Brinkhof, Martin WG Spinal Cord Article STUDY DESIGN: Simulations using data from a prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate how prospective cohort data can be employed in randomized controlled trial (RCT) planning to assess feasibility and operational challenges, using TASCI (Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injury to prevent neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a nationwide randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial) as a case study. SETTING: Spinal cord injury rehabilitation centers in Switzerland. METHODS: TASCI is nested in the multicenter Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI), which prospectively includes patients with acute spinal cord injury. In simulations, data from 640 patients, collected by SwiSCI, were used to investigate different scenarios of patient eligibility and study consent, as well as the performance of the randomization list. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the population of interest and the simulation results; multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of discharge within the TASCI intervention time period. RESULTS: The recruitment target of 114 patients is obtainable within the originally envisioned three-year time period under the most favorable recruitment scenario examined. The distribution of the primary prognostic factor produced imbalance in the randomization lists and informed further discussion of the cut-off values used in stratification. Influxes of patients resulted in overlapping intervention periods for multiple participants, which guided resource allocation. Early discharge was related to the primary prognostic factor and study center, but is only anticipated in about 8% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective cohort data are a very valuable resource for planning RCTs. 2021-09-01 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7611589/ /pubmed/33235299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00588-z Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#termsUsers may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Anderson, Collene E
Birkhäuser, Veronika
Stalder, Stephanie A
Bachmann, Lucas M
Curt, Armin
Jordan, Xavier
Leitner, Lorenz
Liechti, Martina D
Mehnert, Ulrich
Möhr, Sandra
Pannek, Jürgen
Schubert, Martin
van der Lely, Stéphanie
Kessler, Thomas M
Brinkhof, Martin WG
Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology
title Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology
title_full Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology
title_fullStr Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology
title_short Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology
title_sort optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00588-z
work_keys_str_mv AT andersoncollenee optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT birkhauserveronika optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT stalderstephaniea optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT bachmannlucasm optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT curtarmin optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT jordanxavier optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT leitnerlorenz optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT liechtimartinad optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT mehnertulrich optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT mohrsandra optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT pannekjurgen optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT schubertmartin optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT vanderlelystephanie optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT kesslerthomasm optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology
AT brinkhofmartinwg optimizingclinicaltrialdesignusingprospectivecohortstudydataacasestudyinneurourology