Cargando…
How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?
BACKGROUND: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9 |
_version_ | 1783605333320531968 |
---|---|
author | Gunner, Richard M. Holton, Mark D. Scantlebury, David M. Hopkins, Phil Shepard, Emily L. C. Fell, Adam J. Garde, Baptiste Quintana, Flavio Gómez-Laich, Agustina Yoda, Ken Yamamoto, Takashi English, Holly Ferreira, Sam Govender, Danny Viljoen, Pauli Bruns, Angela van Schalkwyk, O. Louis Cole, Nik C. Tatayah, Vikash Börger, Luca Redcliffe, James Bell, Stephen H. Marks, Nikki J. Bennett, Nigel C. Tonini, Mariano H. Williams, Hannah J. Duarte, Carlos M. van Rooyen, Martin C. Bertelsen, Mads F. Tambling, Craig J. Wilson, Rory P. |
author_facet | Gunner, Richard M. Holton, Mark D. Scantlebury, David M. Hopkins, Phil Shepard, Emily L. C. Fell, Adam J. Garde, Baptiste Quintana, Flavio Gómez-Laich, Agustina Yoda, Ken Yamamoto, Takashi English, Holly Ferreira, Sam Govender, Danny Viljoen, Pauli Bruns, Angela van Schalkwyk, O. Louis Cole, Nik C. Tatayah, Vikash Börger, Luca Redcliffe, James Bell, Stephen H. Marks, Nikki J. Bennett, Nigel C. Tonini, Mariano H. Williams, Hannah J. Duarte, Carlos M. van Rooyen, Martin C. Bertelsen, Mads F. Tambling, Craig J. Wilson, Rory P. |
author_sort | Gunner, Richard M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (‘VPs’) so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal–barrier interactions and foraging strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7612089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76120892021-12-10 How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? Gunner, Richard M. Holton, Mark D. Scantlebury, David M. Hopkins, Phil Shepard, Emily L. C. Fell, Adam J. Garde, Baptiste Quintana, Flavio Gómez-Laich, Agustina Yoda, Ken Yamamoto, Takashi English, Holly Ferreira, Sam Govender, Danny Viljoen, Pauli Bruns, Angela van Schalkwyk, O. Louis Cole, Nik C. Tatayah, Vikash Börger, Luca Redcliffe, James Bell, Stephen H. Marks, Nikki J. Bennett, Nigel C. Tonini, Mariano H. Williams, Hannah J. Duarte, Carlos M. van Rooyen, Martin C. Bertelsen, Mads F. Tambling, Craig J. Wilson, Rory P. Anim Biotelemetry Article BACKGROUND: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (‘VPs’) so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal–barrier interactions and foraging strategies. 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7612089/ /pubmed/34900262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Article Gunner, Richard M. Holton, Mark D. Scantlebury, David M. Hopkins, Phil Shepard, Emily L. C. Fell, Adam J. Garde, Baptiste Quintana, Flavio Gómez-Laich, Agustina Yoda, Ken Yamamoto, Takashi English, Holly Ferreira, Sam Govender, Danny Viljoen, Pauli Bruns, Angela van Schalkwyk, O. Louis Cole, Nik C. Tatayah, Vikash Börger, Luca Redcliffe, James Bell, Stephen H. Marks, Nikki J. Bennett, Nigel C. Tonini, Mariano H. Williams, Hannah J. Duarte, Carlos M. van Rooyen, Martin C. Bertelsen, Mads F. Tambling, Craig J. Wilson, Rory P. How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title | How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_full | How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_fullStr | How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_full_unstemmed | How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_short | How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
title_sort | how often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunnerrichardm howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT holtonmarkd howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT scantleburydavidm howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT hopkinsphil howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT shepardemilylc howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT felladamj howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT gardebaptiste howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT quintanaflavio howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT gomezlaichagustina howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT yodaken howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT yamamototakashi howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT englishholly howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT ferreirasam howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT govenderdanny howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT viljoenpauli howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT brunsangela howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT vanschalkwykolouis howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT colenikc howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT tatayahvikash howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT borgerluca howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT redcliffejames howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT bellstephenh howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT marksnikkij howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT bennettnigelc howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT toninimarianoh howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT williamshannahj howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT duartecarlosm howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT vanrooyenmartinc howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT bertelsenmadsf howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT tamblingcraigj howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift AT wilsonroryp howoftenshoulddeadreckonedanimalmovementpathsbecorrectedfordrift |