Cargando…

User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of user testing for improving healthcare professionals’ retrieval and comprehension of information in medicines guidelines. METHODS: The United Kingdom’s Injectable Medicines Guide was selected as a case study. This gives guidance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Matthew D., Franklin, Bryony Dean, Watson, Margaret C., Raynor, DK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000723
_version_ 1783605337919586304
author Jones, Matthew D.
Franklin, Bryony Dean
Watson, Margaret C.
Raynor, DK
author_facet Jones, Matthew D.
Franklin, Bryony Dean
Watson, Margaret C.
Raynor, DK
author_sort Jones, Matthew D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of user testing for improving healthcare professionals’ retrieval and comprehension of information in medicines guidelines. METHODS: The United Kingdom’s Injectable Medicines Guide was selected as a case study. This gives guidance to nurses on preparing and administering intravenous medicines on hospital wards, in line with standard UK practice. Three rounds of user testing were completed with 10 hospital nurses per round, using the Injectable Medicines Guide for voriconazole and aminophylline. Participants used the guidelines to answer 17 questions related to the administration of these medicines. Answers were scored for “finding” and “understanding” the required information. Semistructured interviews explored participants’ opinions of guideline content, design, and wording, with responses analyzed thematically. The guidelines were revised between rounds. RESULTS: In round 1, 8 of 17 questions were answered correctly by all participants. Participants had difficulty with dose, dilution, administration rate, and adverse effects questions. Revisions included new subsections and increased calculation support. In round 2, 14 of 17 questions were answered correctly by all participants. Difficulty persisted with dose and administration rate questions and further revisions made. In round 3, 15 of 17 questions were answered correctly by all participants. Across all rounds, participants considered appropriate subheadings and information order as important for fast location of information. Specific, detailed, and practical instructions were perceived as important to improve understandability and usefulness. CONCLUSIONS: Key information in medicines guidelines may not be found and/or understood by healthcare professionals. User testing increased information retrieval and comprehension and could have an important role in improving the safety of medicines use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7612138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76121382022-01-01 User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety Jones, Matthew D. Franklin, Bryony Dean Watson, Margaret C. Raynor, DK J Patient Saf Original Studies OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of user testing for improving healthcare professionals’ retrieval and comprehension of information in medicines guidelines. METHODS: The United Kingdom’s Injectable Medicines Guide was selected as a case study. This gives guidance to nurses on preparing and administering intravenous medicines on hospital wards, in line with standard UK practice. Three rounds of user testing were completed with 10 hospital nurses per round, using the Injectable Medicines Guide for voriconazole and aminophylline. Participants used the guidelines to answer 17 questions related to the administration of these medicines. Answers were scored for “finding” and “understanding” the required information. Semistructured interviews explored participants’ opinions of guideline content, design, and wording, with responses analyzed thematically. The guidelines were revised between rounds. RESULTS: In round 1, 8 of 17 questions were answered correctly by all participants. Participants had difficulty with dose, dilution, administration rate, and adverse effects questions. Revisions included new subsections and increased calculation support. In round 2, 14 of 17 questions were answered correctly by all participants. Difficulty persisted with dose and administration rate questions and further revisions made. In round 3, 15 of 17 questions were answered correctly by all participants. Across all rounds, participants considered appropriate subheadings and information order as important for fast location of information. Specific, detailed, and practical instructions were perceived as important to improve understandability and usefulness. CONCLUSIONS: Key information in medicines guidelines may not be found and/or understood by healthcare professionals. User testing increased information retrieval and comprehension and could have an important role in improving the safety of medicines use. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7612138/ /pubmed/32569098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000723 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Studies
Jones, Matthew D.
Franklin, Bryony Dean
Watson, Margaret C.
Raynor, DK
User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety
title User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety
title_full User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety
title_fullStr User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety
title_full_unstemmed User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety
title_short User Testing to Improve Retrieval and Comprehension of Information in Guidelines to Improve Medicines Safety
title_sort user testing to improve retrieval and comprehension of information in guidelines to improve medicines safety
topic Original Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000723
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesmatthewd usertestingtoimproveretrievalandcomprehensionofinformationinguidelinestoimprovemedicinessafety
AT franklinbryonydean usertestingtoimproveretrievalandcomprehensionofinformationinguidelinestoimprovemedicinessafety
AT watsonmargaretc usertestingtoimproveretrievalandcomprehensionofinformationinguidelinestoimprovemedicinessafety
AT raynordk usertestingtoimproveretrievalandcomprehensionofinformationinguidelinestoimprovemedicinessafety