Cargando…

Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia

BACKGROUND: The Recovery Approach is about supporting people to live the best life they possibly can. This paper reports on a 2008–11 study of a recovery-focussed, one-to-one coaching programme called Whole Life (WL) in a group of people with stabilised schizophrenia. WL comprises 15 modules, each a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gale, Tim M., Woodward, Jan, Meredith-Windle, Glynis, Balakumar, Thanusha, Littlechild, Brian, Hawley, Chris J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35342884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13220.2
_version_ 1783605378968190976
author Gale, Tim M.
Woodward, Jan
Meredith-Windle, Glynis
Balakumar, Thanusha
Littlechild, Brian
Hawley, Chris J.
author_facet Gale, Tim M.
Woodward, Jan
Meredith-Windle, Glynis
Balakumar, Thanusha
Littlechild, Brian
Hawley, Chris J.
author_sort Gale, Tim M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Recovery Approach is about supporting people to live the best life they possibly can. This paper reports on a 2008–11 study of a recovery-focussed, one-to-one coaching programme called Whole Life (WL) in a group of people with stabilised schizophrenia. WL comprises 15 modules, each addressing an aspect of life that may pose challenges for someone with mental illness. It involves regular meetings with a coach, additional homework activities and lasts approximately one-year. This level of commitment requires participants to be motivated and enthusiastic. METHODS: This was a non-randomised feasibility study, designed to assess acceptability and potential benefits of WL. The WL group was compared to another group of people with the same diagnosis, who received their usual treatment. This was not a strict control group. The primary outcome measure was the Social Adaptation Self-Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Of those recruited to the WL group, 33/44 (75%) completed the full programme. WL participants showed an 11-point increase in mean SASS between baseline and Week 60. Subjective ratings showed benefits of WL at 3 and 6 months after the intervention had ceased, with most saying they felt better and none saying that they felt worse. The comparison group was more ill than the WL group at baseline and showed some improvement over the course of the study, albeit at a lower level than the WL group. However, controlling for baseline group differences meant that none of the outcome measures could reliably distinguish between WL and comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that WL is an acceptable and helpful intervention for motivated and enthusiastic individuals. It may have wider applicability for people with a less serious and chronic mental illness, although we do not know how it compares to other interventions. We discuss some methodological limitations of the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7612533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76125332022-03-24 Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia Gale, Tim M. Woodward, Jan Meredith-Windle, Glynis Balakumar, Thanusha Littlechild, Brian Hawley, Chris J. NIHR Open Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Recovery Approach is about supporting people to live the best life they possibly can. This paper reports on a 2008–11 study of a recovery-focussed, one-to-one coaching programme called Whole Life (WL) in a group of people with stabilised schizophrenia. WL comprises 15 modules, each addressing an aspect of life that may pose challenges for someone with mental illness. It involves regular meetings with a coach, additional homework activities and lasts approximately one-year. This level of commitment requires participants to be motivated and enthusiastic. METHODS: This was a non-randomised feasibility study, designed to assess acceptability and potential benefits of WL. The WL group was compared to another group of people with the same diagnosis, who received their usual treatment. This was not a strict control group. The primary outcome measure was the Social Adaptation Self-Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Of those recruited to the WL group, 33/44 (75%) completed the full programme. WL participants showed an 11-point increase in mean SASS between baseline and Week 60. Subjective ratings showed benefits of WL at 3 and 6 months after the intervention had ceased, with most saying they felt better and none saying that they felt worse. The comparison group was more ill than the WL group at baseline and showed some improvement over the course of the study, albeit at a lower level than the WL group. However, controlling for baseline group differences meant that none of the outcome measures could reliably distinguish between WL and comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that WL is an acceptable and helpful intervention for motivated and enthusiastic individuals. It may have wider applicability for people with a less serious and chronic mental illness, although we do not know how it compares to other interventions. We discuss some methodological limitations of the study. F1000 Research Limited 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7612533/ /pubmed/35342884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13220.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Gale TM et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gale, Tim M.
Woodward, Jan
Meredith-Windle, Glynis
Balakumar, Thanusha
Littlechild, Brian
Hawley, Chris J.
Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia
title Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia
title_full Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia
title_fullStr Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia
title_short Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia
title_sort whole life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35342884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13220.2
work_keys_str_mv AT galetimm wholelifeafeasibilitystudyofarecoveryfocussedinterventioninpatientswithstabilisedschizophrenia
AT woodwardjan wholelifeafeasibilitystudyofarecoveryfocussedinterventioninpatientswithstabilisedschizophrenia
AT meredithwindleglynis wholelifeafeasibilitystudyofarecoveryfocussedinterventioninpatientswithstabilisedschizophrenia
AT balakumarthanusha wholelifeafeasibilitystudyofarecoveryfocussedinterventioninpatientswithstabilisedschizophrenia
AT littlechildbrian wholelifeafeasibilitystudyofarecoveryfocussedinterventioninpatientswithstabilisedschizophrenia
AT hawleychrisj wholelifeafeasibilitystudyofarecoveryfocussedinterventioninpatientswithstabilisedschizophrenia