Cargando…

The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited

Elasmobranchii are relatively well-studied. However, numerous phylogenetic uncertainties about their relationships remain. Here, we revisit the phylogenetic evidence based on a detailed morphological re-evaluation of all the major extant batomorph clades (skates and rays), including several holomorp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo, Marramà, Giuseppe, Carnevale, Giorgio, Claeson, Kerin M., Underwood, Charlie J., Naylor, Gavin J. P., Kriwet, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747489
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d14060456
_version_ 1783605422117093376
author Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo
Marramà, Giuseppe
Carnevale, Giorgio
Claeson, Kerin M.
Underwood, Charlie J.
Naylor, Gavin J. P.
Kriwet, Jürgen
author_facet Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo
Marramà, Giuseppe
Carnevale, Giorgio
Claeson, Kerin M.
Underwood, Charlie J.
Naylor, Gavin J. P.
Kriwet, Jürgen
author_sort Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo
collection PubMed
description Elasmobranchii are relatively well-studied. However, numerous phylogenetic uncertainties about their relationships remain. Here, we revisit the phylogenetic evidence based on a detailed morphological re-evaluation of all the major extant batomorph clades (skates and rays), including several holomorphic fossil taxa from the Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, and an extensive outgroup sampling, which includes sharks, chimaeras and several other fossil chondrichthyans. The parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses found more resolved but contrasting topologies, with the Bayesian inference tree neither supporting nor disfavouring any of them. Overall, the analyses result in similar clade compositions and topologies, with the Jurassic batomorphs forming the sister clade to all the other batomorphs, whilst all the Cretaceous batomorphs are nested within the remaining main clades. The disparate arrangements recovered under the different criteria suggest that a detailed study of Jurassic taxa is of utmost importance to present a more consistent topology in the deeper nodes, as issues continue to be present when analysing those clades previously recognized only by molecular analyses (e.g., Rhinopristiformes and Torpediniformes). The consistent placement of fossil taxa within specific groups by the different phylogenetic criteria is promising and indicates that the inclusion of more fossil taxa in the present matrix will likely not cause loss of resolution, therefore suggesting that a strong phylogenetic signal can be recovered from fossil taxa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7612883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76128832022-06-22 The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo Marramà, Giuseppe Carnevale, Giorgio Claeson, Kerin M. Underwood, Charlie J. Naylor, Gavin J. P. Kriwet, Jürgen Diversity (Basel) Article Elasmobranchii are relatively well-studied. However, numerous phylogenetic uncertainties about their relationships remain. Here, we revisit the phylogenetic evidence based on a detailed morphological re-evaluation of all the major extant batomorph clades (skates and rays), including several holomorphic fossil taxa from the Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, and an extensive outgroup sampling, which includes sharks, chimaeras and several other fossil chondrichthyans. The parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses found more resolved but contrasting topologies, with the Bayesian inference tree neither supporting nor disfavouring any of them. Overall, the analyses result in similar clade compositions and topologies, with the Jurassic batomorphs forming the sister clade to all the other batomorphs, whilst all the Cretaceous batomorphs are nested within the remaining main clades. The disparate arrangements recovered under the different criteria suggest that a detailed study of Jurassic taxa is of utmost importance to present a more consistent topology in the deeper nodes, as issues continue to be present when analysing those clades previously recognized only by molecular analyses (e.g., Rhinopristiformes and Torpediniformes). The consistent placement of fossil taxa within specific groups by the different phylogenetic criteria is promising and indicates that the inclusion of more fossil taxa in the present matrix will likely not cause loss of resolution, therefore suggesting that a strong phylogenetic signal can be recovered from fossil taxa. 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7612883/ /pubmed/35747489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d14060456 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo
Marramà, Giuseppe
Carnevale, Giorgio
Claeson, Kerin M.
Underwood, Charlie J.
Naylor, Gavin J. P.
Kriwet, Jürgen
The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited
title The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited
title_full The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited
title_fullStr The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited
title_full_unstemmed The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited
title_short The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited
title_sort phylogeny of rays and skates (chondrichthyes: elasmobranchii) based on morphological characters revisited
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747489
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d14060456
work_keys_str_mv AT villalobosseguraeduardo thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT marramagiuseppe thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT carnevalegiorgio thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT claesonkerinm thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT underwoodcharliej thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT naylorgavinjp thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT kriwetjurgen thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT villalobosseguraeduardo phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT marramagiuseppe phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT carnevalegiorgio phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT claesonkerinm phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT underwoodcharliej phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT naylorgavinjp phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited
AT kriwetjurgen phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited