Cargando…
The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited
Elasmobranchii are relatively well-studied. However, numerous phylogenetic uncertainties about their relationships remain. Here, we revisit the phylogenetic evidence based on a detailed morphological re-evaluation of all the major extant batomorph clades (skates and rays), including several holomorp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d14060456 |
_version_ | 1783605422117093376 |
---|---|
author | Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo Marramà, Giuseppe Carnevale, Giorgio Claeson, Kerin M. Underwood, Charlie J. Naylor, Gavin J. P. Kriwet, Jürgen |
author_facet | Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo Marramà, Giuseppe Carnevale, Giorgio Claeson, Kerin M. Underwood, Charlie J. Naylor, Gavin J. P. Kriwet, Jürgen |
author_sort | Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Elasmobranchii are relatively well-studied. However, numerous phylogenetic uncertainties about their relationships remain. Here, we revisit the phylogenetic evidence based on a detailed morphological re-evaluation of all the major extant batomorph clades (skates and rays), including several holomorphic fossil taxa from the Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, and an extensive outgroup sampling, which includes sharks, chimaeras and several other fossil chondrichthyans. The parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses found more resolved but contrasting topologies, with the Bayesian inference tree neither supporting nor disfavouring any of them. Overall, the analyses result in similar clade compositions and topologies, with the Jurassic batomorphs forming the sister clade to all the other batomorphs, whilst all the Cretaceous batomorphs are nested within the remaining main clades. The disparate arrangements recovered under the different criteria suggest that a detailed study of Jurassic taxa is of utmost importance to present a more consistent topology in the deeper nodes, as issues continue to be present when analysing those clades previously recognized only by molecular analyses (e.g., Rhinopristiformes and Torpediniformes). The consistent placement of fossil taxa within specific groups by the different phylogenetic criteria is promising and indicates that the inclusion of more fossil taxa in the present matrix will likely not cause loss of resolution, therefore suggesting that a strong phylogenetic signal can be recovered from fossil taxa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7612883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76128832022-06-22 The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo Marramà, Giuseppe Carnevale, Giorgio Claeson, Kerin M. Underwood, Charlie J. Naylor, Gavin J. P. Kriwet, Jürgen Diversity (Basel) Article Elasmobranchii are relatively well-studied. However, numerous phylogenetic uncertainties about their relationships remain. Here, we revisit the phylogenetic evidence based on a detailed morphological re-evaluation of all the major extant batomorph clades (skates and rays), including several holomorphic fossil taxa from the Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, and an extensive outgroup sampling, which includes sharks, chimaeras and several other fossil chondrichthyans. The parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses found more resolved but contrasting topologies, with the Bayesian inference tree neither supporting nor disfavouring any of them. Overall, the analyses result in similar clade compositions and topologies, with the Jurassic batomorphs forming the sister clade to all the other batomorphs, whilst all the Cretaceous batomorphs are nested within the remaining main clades. The disparate arrangements recovered under the different criteria suggest that a detailed study of Jurassic taxa is of utmost importance to present a more consistent topology in the deeper nodes, as issues continue to be present when analysing those clades previously recognized only by molecular analyses (e.g., Rhinopristiformes and Torpediniformes). The consistent placement of fossil taxa within specific groups by the different phylogenetic criteria is promising and indicates that the inclusion of more fossil taxa in the present matrix will likely not cause loss of resolution, therefore suggesting that a strong phylogenetic signal can be recovered from fossil taxa. 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7612883/ /pubmed/35747489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d14060456 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo Marramà, Giuseppe Carnevale, Giorgio Claeson, Kerin M. Underwood, Charlie J. Naylor, Gavin J. P. Kriwet, Jürgen The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited |
title | The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited |
title_full | The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited |
title_fullStr | The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited |
title_short | The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited |
title_sort | phylogeny of rays and skates (chondrichthyes: elasmobranchii) based on morphological characters revisited |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d14060456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villalobosseguraeduardo thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT marramagiuseppe thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT carnevalegiorgio thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT claesonkerinm thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT underwoodcharliej thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT naylorgavinjp thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT kriwetjurgen thephylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT villalobosseguraeduardo phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT marramagiuseppe phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT carnevalegiorgio phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT claesonkerinm phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT underwoodcharliej phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT naylorgavinjp phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited AT kriwetjurgen phylogenyofraysandskateschondrichthyeselasmobranchiibasedonmorphologicalcharactersrevisited |