Cargando…

Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning

Attention can be deployed in different ways: When searching for a taxi in New York City, we can decide where to attend (e.g., to the street) and what to attend to (e.g., yellow cars). Although we use the same word to describe both processes, nonhuman primate data suggest that these produce distinct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goddard, Erin, Carlson, Thomas A., Woolgar, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01796
_version_ 1783605442005434368
author Goddard, Erin
Carlson, Thomas A.
Woolgar, Alexandra
author_facet Goddard, Erin
Carlson, Thomas A.
Woolgar, Alexandra
author_sort Goddard, Erin
collection PubMed
description Attention can be deployed in different ways: When searching for a taxi in New York City, we can decide where to attend (e.g., to the street) and what to attend to (e.g., yellow cars). Although we use the same word to describe both processes, nonhuman primate data suggest that these produce distinct effects on neural tuning. This has been challenging to assess in humans, but here we used an opportunity afforded by multivariate decoding of MEG data. We found that attending to an object at a particular location and attending to a particular object feature produced effects that interacted multiplicatively. The two types of attention induced distinct patterns of enhancement in occipital cortex, with feature-selective attention producing relatively more enhancement of small feature differences and spatial attention producing relatively larger effects for larger feature differences. An information flow analysis further showed that stimulus representations in occipital cortex were Granger-caused by coding in frontal cortices earlier in time and that the timing of this feedback matched the onset of attention effects. The data suggest that spatial and feature-selective attention rely on distinct neural mechanisms that arise from frontal-occipital information exchange, interacting multiplicatively to selectively enhance task-relevant information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7613071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76130712022-07-17 Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning Goddard, Erin Carlson, Thomas A. Woolgar, Alexandra J Cogn Neurosci Article Attention can be deployed in different ways: When searching for a taxi in New York City, we can decide where to attend (e.g., to the street) and what to attend to (e.g., yellow cars). Although we use the same word to describe both processes, nonhuman primate data suggest that these produce distinct effects on neural tuning. This has been challenging to assess in humans, but here we used an opportunity afforded by multivariate decoding of MEG data. We found that attending to an object at a particular location and attending to a particular object feature produced effects that interacted multiplicatively. The two types of attention induced distinct patterns of enhancement in occipital cortex, with feature-selective attention producing relatively more enhancement of small feature differences and spatial attention producing relatively larger effects for larger feature differences. An information flow analysis further showed that stimulus representations in occipital cortex were Granger-caused by coding in frontal cortices earlier in time and that the timing of this feedback matched the onset of attention effects. The data suggest that spatial and feature-selective attention rely on distinct neural mechanisms that arise from frontal-occipital information exchange, interacting multiplicatively to selectively enhance task-relevant information. 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7613071/ /pubmed/34813647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01796 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Goddard, Erin
Carlson, Thomas A.
Woolgar, Alexandra
Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning
title Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning
title_full Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning
title_fullStr Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning
title_full_unstemmed Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning
title_short Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning
title_sort spatial and feature-selective attention have distinct, interacting effects on population-level tuning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01796
work_keys_str_mv AT goddarderin spatialandfeatureselectiveattentionhavedistinctinteractingeffectsonpopulationleveltuning
AT carlsonthomasa spatialandfeatureselectiveattentionhavedistinctinteractingeffectsonpopulationleveltuning
AT woolgaralexandra spatialandfeatureselectiveattentionhavedistinctinteractingeffectsonpopulationleveltuning