Cargando…
End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom
BACKGROUND: Although child mortality has decreased over the last few decades, around 4,500 infants and children die in the UK every year, many of whom require palliative care. There is, however, little evidence on paediatric end-of-life care services. The current National Institute for Health and Ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13273.1 |
_version_ | 1783605456295428096 |
---|---|
author | Papworth, Andrew Hackett, Julia Beresford, Bryony Murtagh, Fliss Weatherly, Helen Hinde, Sebastian Bedendo, Andre Walker, Gabriella Noyes, Jane Oddie, Sam Vasudevan, Chakrapani Feltbower, Richard Phillips, Bob Hain, Richard Subramanian, Gayathri Haynes, Andrew Fraser, Lorna K |
author_facet | Papworth, Andrew Hackett, Julia Beresford, Bryony Murtagh, Fliss Weatherly, Helen Hinde, Sebastian Bedendo, Andre Walker, Gabriella Noyes, Jane Oddie, Sam Vasudevan, Chakrapani Feltbower, Richard Phillips, Bob Hain, Richard Subramanian, Gayathri Haynes, Andrew Fraser, Lorna K |
author_sort | Papworth, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although child mortality has decreased over the last few decades, around 4,500 infants and children die in the UK every year, many of whom require palliative care. There is, however, little evidence on paediatric end-of-life care services. The current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance provides recommendations about what should be offered, but these are based on low quality evidence. The ENHANCE study aims to identify and investigate the different models of existing end-of-life care provision for infants, children, and young people in the UK, including an assessment of the outcomes and experiences for children and parents, and the cost implications to families and healthcare providers. METHODS: This mixed methods study will use three linked workstreams and a cross-cutting health economics theme to examine end-of-life care models in three exemplar clinical settings: infant, children and young adult cancer services (PTCs), paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and neonatal units (NNUs). Workstream 1 (WS1) will survey current practice in each setting and will result in an outline of the different models of care used. WS2 is a qualitative comparison of the experiences of staff, parents and patients across the different models identified. WS3 is a quantitative assessment of the outcomes, resource use and costs across the different models identified. DISCUSSION: Results from this study will contribute to an understanding of how end-of-life care can provide the greatest benefit for children at the end of their lives. It will also allow us to understand the likely benefits of additional funding in end-of-life care in terms of patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7613236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76132362022-08-05 End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom Papworth, Andrew Hackett, Julia Beresford, Bryony Murtagh, Fliss Weatherly, Helen Hinde, Sebastian Bedendo, Andre Walker, Gabriella Noyes, Jane Oddie, Sam Vasudevan, Chakrapani Feltbower, Richard Phillips, Bob Hain, Richard Subramanian, Gayathri Haynes, Andrew Fraser, Lorna K NIHR Open Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Although child mortality has decreased over the last few decades, around 4,500 infants and children die in the UK every year, many of whom require palliative care. There is, however, little evidence on paediatric end-of-life care services. The current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance provides recommendations about what should be offered, but these are based on low quality evidence. The ENHANCE study aims to identify and investigate the different models of existing end-of-life care provision for infants, children, and young people in the UK, including an assessment of the outcomes and experiences for children and parents, and the cost implications to families and healthcare providers. METHODS: This mixed methods study will use three linked workstreams and a cross-cutting health economics theme to examine end-of-life care models in three exemplar clinical settings: infant, children and young adult cancer services (PTCs), paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and neonatal units (NNUs). Workstream 1 (WS1) will survey current practice in each setting and will result in an outline of the different models of care used. WS2 is a qualitative comparison of the experiences of staff, parents and patients across the different models identified. WS3 is a quantitative assessment of the outcomes, resource use and costs across the different models identified. DISCUSSION: Results from this study will contribute to an understanding of how end-of-life care can provide the greatest benefit for children at the end of their lives. It will also allow us to understand the likely benefits of additional funding in end-of-life care in terms of patient outcomes. F1000 Research Limited 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7613236/ /pubmed/35935675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13273.1 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Papworth A et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Papworth, Andrew Hackett, Julia Beresford, Bryony Murtagh, Fliss Weatherly, Helen Hinde, Sebastian Bedendo, Andre Walker, Gabriella Noyes, Jane Oddie, Sam Vasudevan, Chakrapani Feltbower, Richard Phillips, Bob Hain, Richard Subramanian, Gayathri Haynes, Andrew Fraser, Lorna K End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom |
title | End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom |
title_full | End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom |
title_short | End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | end of life care for infants, children and young people (enhance): protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the united kingdom |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13273.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papworthandrew endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT hackettjulia endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT beresfordbryony endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT murtaghfliss endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT weatherlyhelen endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT hindesebastian endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT bedendoandre endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT walkergabriella endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT noyesjane endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT oddiesam endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT vasudevanchakrapani endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT feltbowerrichard endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT phillipsbob endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT hainrichard endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT subramaniangayathri endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT haynesandrew endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom AT fraserlornak endoflifecareforinfantschildrenandyoungpeopleenhanceprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofcurrentpracticeintheunitedkingdom |