Cargando…

Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging

Hyperspectral cameras onboard unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently emerged for monitoring crop traits at the sub-field scale. Different physical, statistical, and hybrid methods for crop trait retrieval have been developed. However, spectra collected from UAVs can be confounded by various i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelbaki, Asmaa, Schlerf, Martin, Retzlaff, Rebecca, Machwitz, Miriam, Verrelst, Jochem, Udelhoven, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13091748
_version_ 1783605477146361856
author Abdelbaki, Asmaa
Schlerf, Martin
Retzlaff, Rebecca
Machwitz, Miriam
Verrelst, Jochem
Udelhoven, Thomas
author_facet Abdelbaki, Asmaa
Schlerf, Martin
Retzlaff, Rebecca
Machwitz, Miriam
Verrelst, Jochem
Udelhoven, Thomas
author_sort Abdelbaki, Asmaa
collection PubMed
description Hyperspectral cameras onboard unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently emerged for monitoring crop traits at the sub-field scale. Different physical, statistical, and hybrid methods for crop trait retrieval have been developed. However, spectra collected from UAVs can be confounded by various issues, including illumination variation throughout the crop growing season, the effect of which on the retrieval performance is not well understood at present. In this study, four retrieval methods are compared, in terms of retrieving the leaf area index (LAI), fractional vegetation cover (fCover), and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) of potato plants over an agricultural field for six dates during the growing season. We analyzed: (1) The standard look-up table method (LUTstd), (2) an improved (regularized) LUT method that involves variable correlation (LUTreg), (3) hybrid methods, and (4) random forest regression without (RF) and with (RFexp) the exposure time as an additional explanatory variable. The Soil–Leaf–Canopy (SLC) model was used in association with the LUT-based inversion and hybrid methods, while the statistical modelling methods (RF and RFexp) relied entirely on in situ data. The results revealed that RFexp was the best-performing method, yielding the highest accuracies, in terms of the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), for LAI (5.36%), fCover (5.87%), and CCC (15.01%). RFexp was able to reduce the effects of illumination variability and cloud shadows. LUTreg outperformed the other two retrieval methods (hybrid methods and LUTstd), with an NRMSE of 9.18% for LAI, 10.46% for fCover, and 12.16% for CCC. Conversely, LUTreg led to lower accuracies than those derived from RF for LAI (5.51%) and for fCover (6.23%), but not for CCC (16.21%). Therefore, the machine learning approaches—in particular, RF—appear to be the most promising retrieval methods for application to UAV-based hyperspectral data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7613394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76133942022-09-07 Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging Abdelbaki, Asmaa Schlerf, Martin Retzlaff, Rebecca Machwitz, Miriam Verrelst, Jochem Udelhoven, Thomas Remote Sens (Basel) Article Hyperspectral cameras onboard unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently emerged for monitoring crop traits at the sub-field scale. Different physical, statistical, and hybrid methods for crop trait retrieval have been developed. However, spectra collected from UAVs can be confounded by various issues, including illumination variation throughout the crop growing season, the effect of which on the retrieval performance is not well understood at present. In this study, four retrieval methods are compared, in terms of retrieving the leaf area index (LAI), fractional vegetation cover (fCover), and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) of potato plants over an agricultural field for six dates during the growing season. We analyzed: (1) The standard look-up table method (LUTstd), (2) an improved (regularized) LUT method that involves variable correlation (LUTreg), (3) hybrid methods, and (4) random forest regression without (RF) and with (RFexp) the exposure time as an additional explanatory variable. The Soil–Leaf–Canopy (SLC) model was used in association with the LUT-based inversion and hybrid methods, while the statistical modelling methods (RF and RFexp) relied entirely on in situ data. The results revealed that RFexp was the best-performing method, yielding the highest accuracies, in terms of the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), for LAI (5.36%), fCover (5.87%), and CCC (15.01%). RFexp was able to reduce the effects of illumination variability and cloud shadows. LUTreg outperformed the other two retrieval methods (hybrid methods and LUTstd), with an NRMSE of 9.18% for LAI, 10.46% for fCover, and 12.16% for CCC. Conversely, LUTreg led to lower accuracies than those derived from RF for LAI (5.51%) and for fCover (6.23%), but not for CCC (16.21%). Therefore, the machine learning approaches—in particular, RF—appear to be the most promising retrieval methods for application to UAV-based hyperspectral data. 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7613394/ /pubmed/36081647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13091748 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abdelbaki, Asmaa
Schlerf, Martin
Retzlaff, Rebecca
Machwitz, Miriam
Verrelst, Jochem
Udelhoven, Thomas
Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging
title Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging
title_full Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging
title_short Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging
title_sort comparison of crop trait retrieval strategies using uav-based vnir hyperspectral imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13091748
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelbakiasmaa comparisonofcroptraitretrievalstrategiesusinguavbasedvnirhyperspectralimaging
AT schlerfmartin comparisonofcroptraitretrievalstrategiesusinguavbasedvnirhyperspectralimaging
AT retzlaffrebecca comparisonofcroptraitretrievalstrategiesusinguavbasedvnirhyperspectralimaging
AT machwitzmiriam comparisonofcroptraitretrievalstrategiesusinguavbasedvnirhyperspectralimaging
AT verrelstjochem comparisonofcroptraitretrievalstrategiesusinguavbasedvnirhyperspectralimaging
AT udelhoventhomas comparisonofcroptraitretrievalstrategiesusinguavbasedvnirhyperspectralimaging