Cargando…

“The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that people living in poverty often experience inadequate nutrition with short and long-term health consequences. Whilst the diets of low-income households have been subject to scrutiny, there is limited evidence in the UK on the diet quality and food practices of house...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Power, Maddy, Pybus, Katie J., Pickett, Kate E., Doherty, Bob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034185
http://dx.doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14062.1
_version_ 1783605481143533568
author Power, Maddy
Pybus, Katie J.
Pickett, Kate E.
Doherty, Bob
author_facet Power, Maddy
Pybus, Katie J.
Pickett, Kate E.
Doherty, Bob
author_sort Power, Maddy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that people living in poverty often experience inadequate nutrition with short and long-term health consequences. Whilst the diets of low-income households have been subject to scrutiny, there is limited evidence in the UK on the diet quality and food practices of households reporting food insecurity and food bank use. We explore lived experiences of food insecurity and underlying drivers of diet quality among low-income families, drawing upon two years of participatory research with families of primary school age children. METHODS: We report on a mixed-methods study of the relationship between low income, food bank use, food practices and consumption from a survey of 612 participants, including 136 free text responses and four focus groups with 22 participants. The research followed a parallel mixed-methods design: qualitative and quantitative data were collected separately, although both were informed by participatory work. Quantitative data were analysed using binary and multinomial logistic regression modelling; qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Lower income households and those living with food insecurity struggle to afford a level of fruit and vegetable consumption that approaches public health guidance for maintaining a healthy diet, despite high awareness of the constituents of a healthy diet. Participants used multiple strategies to ensure as much fruit, vegetable and protein consumption as possible within financial constraints. The quantitative data suggested a relationship between higher processed food consumption and having used a food bank, independent of income and food security status. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that individualised, behavioural accounts of food practices on a low-income misrepresent the reality for people living with poverty. Behavioural or educational interventions are therefore likely to be less effective in tackling food insecurity and poor nutrition among people on a low income; policies focusing on structural drivers, including poverty and geographical access to food, are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7613434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76134342022-08-27 “The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] Power, Maddy Pybus, Katie J. Pickett, Kate E. Doherty, Bob Emerald Open Res Article BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that people living in poverty often experience inadequate nutrition with short and long-term health consequences. Whilst the diets of low-income households have been subject to scrutiny, there is limited evidence in the UK on the diet quality and food practices of households reporting food insecurity and food bank use. We explore lived experiences of food insecurity and underlying drivers of diet quality among low-income families, drawing upon two years of participatory research with families of primary school age children. METHODS: We report on a mixed-methods study of the relationship between low income, food bank use, food practices and consumption from a survey of 612 participants, including 136 free text responses and four focus groups with 22 participants. The research followed a parallel mixed-methods design: qualitative and quantitative data were collected separately, although both were informed by participatory work. Quantitative data were analysed using binary and multinomial logistic regression modelling; qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Lower income households and those living with food insecurity struggle to afford a level of fruit and vegetable consumption that approaches public health guidance for maintaining a healthy diet, despite high awareness of the constituents of a healthy diet. Participants used multiple strategies to ensure as much fruit, vegetable and protein consumption as possible within financial constraints. The quantitative data suggested a relationship between higher processed food consumption and having used a food bank, independent of income and food security status. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that individualised, behavioural accounts of food practices on a low-income misrepresent the reality for people living with poverty. Behavioural or educational interventions are therefore likely to be less effective in tackling food insecurity and poor nutrition among people on a low income; policies focusing on structural drivers, including poverty and geographical access to food, are needed. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7613434/ /pubmed/36034185 http://dx.doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14062.1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Power, Maddy
Pybus, Katie J.
Pickett, Kate E.
Doherty, Bob
“The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title “The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full “The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr “The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed “The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short “The reality is that on Universal Credit I cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: Moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort “the reality is that on universal credit i cannot provide the recommended amount of fresh fruit and vegetables per day for my children”: moving from a behavioural to a systemic understanding of food practices [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034185
http://dx.doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14062.1
work_keys_str_mv AT powermaddy therealityisthatonuniversalcrediticannotprovidetherecommendedamountoffreshfruitandvegetablesperdayformychildrenmovingfromabehaviouraltoasystemicunderstandingoffoodpracticesversion1peerreview2approved
AT pybuskatiej therealityisthatonuniversalcrediticannotprovidetherecommendedamountoffreshfruitandvegetablesperdayformychildrenmovingfromabehaviouraltoasystemicunderstandingoffoodpracticesversion1peerreview2approved
AT pickettkatee therealityisthatonuniversalcrediticannotprovidetherecommendedamountoffreshfruitandvegetablesperdayformychildrenmovingfromabehaviouraltoasystemicunderstandingoffoodpracticesversion1peerreview2approved
AT dohertybob therealityisthatonuniversalcrediticannotprovidetherecommendedamountoffreshfruitandvegetablesperdayformychildrenmovingfromabehaviouraltoasystemicunderstandingoffoodpracticesversion1peerreview2approved