Cargando…

Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: About 3·7 billion doses of ivermectin have been distributed in mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns globally over the past 30 years. At 10−100 times higher than current human doses, ivermectin is a known teratogen in mammals. During these campaigns with recommended doses, pregnant wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolas, Patricia, Maia, Marta F, Bassat, Quique, Kobylinski, Kevin C, Monteiro, Wuelton, Rabinovich, N Regina, Menéndez, Clara, Bardají, Azucena, Chaccour, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31839144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30453-X
_version_ 1783605488060989440
author Nicolas, Patricia
Maia, Marta F
Bassat, Quique
Kobylinski, Kevin C
Monteiro, Wuelton
Rabinovich, N Regina
Menéndez, Clara
Bardají, Azucena
Chaccour, Carlos
author_facet Nicolas, Patricia
Maia, Marta F
Bassat, Quique
Kobylinski, Kevin C
Monteiro, Wuelton
Rabinovich, N Regina
Menéndez, Clara
Bardají, Azucena
Chaccour, Carlos
author_sort Nicolas, Patricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: About 3·7 billion doses of ivermectin have been distributed in mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns globally over the past 30 years. At 10−100 times higher than current human doses, ivermectin is a known teratogen in mammals. During these campaigns with recommended doses, pregnant women might be inadvertently exposed. We therefore aimed to evaluate the existing evidence for serious and non-serious adverse events after ivermectin exposure in pregnant women. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched relevant databases and trial registry platforms on July 15, 2018, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported adverse events in pregnant women. We did not use language or date restrictions. Outcomes of interest were spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death (serious adverse events), as well as maternal morbidity, preterm births, and low birthweight (adverse events). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs. We did the meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs separately. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, protocol CRD42016046914. FINDINGS: We identified 147 records, of which only five observational studies and one RCT were included for quantitative analysis; these studies were published between 1990 and 2008, and were done in six African countries. 893 women with 899 pregancy outcomes were included, of whom 496 pregnant women (500 pregnancy outcomes) received ivermectin inadvertently during MDA campaigns in the observational studies and 397 pregnant women (399 pregnancy outcomes) purposely received ivermectin as part of the open-label RCT. No study reported neonatal deaths, maternal morbidity, preterm births, or low birthweight. It is unclear whether exposure to ivermectin during pregnancy increases the risk of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths (odds ratio [OR] 1·15 [95% CI 0·75−1·78] with very low certainty of evidence for the four observational studies and 0·62 [0·18−2·14] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT) or congenital anomalies (OR 1·69 [95% CI 0·83−3·41] with very low certainty of evidence for the five observational studies and 1·10 [0·07−17·65] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT). INTERPRETATION: There is insufficient evidence to conclude on the safety profile of ivermectin during pregnancy. Treatment campaigns should focus additional efforts on preventing inadvertent treatment of pregnant women. FUNDING: Unitaid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7613514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76135142022-09-05 Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nicolas, Patricia Maia, Marta F Bassat, Quique Kobylinski, Kevin C Monteiro, Wuelton Rabinovich, N Regina Menéndez, Clara Bardají, Azucena Chaccour, Carlos Lancet Glob Health Article BACKGROUND: About 3·7 billion doses of ivermectin have been distributed in mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns globally over the past 30 years. At 10−100 times higher than current human doses, ivermectin is a known teratogen in mammals. During these campaigns with recommended doses, pregnant women might be inadvertently exposed. We therefore aimed to evaluate the existing evidence for serious and non-serious adverse events after ivermectin exposure in pregnant women. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched relevant databases and trial registry platforms on July 15, 2018, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported adverse events in pregnant women. We did not use language or date restrictions. Outcomes of interest were spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death (serious adverse events), as well as maternal morbidity, preterm births, and low birthweight (adverse events). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs. We did the meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs separately. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, protocol CRD42016046914. FINDINGS: We identified 147 records, of which only five observational studies and one RCT were included for quantitative analysis; these studies were published between 1990 and 2008, and were done in six African countries. 893 women with 899 pregancy outcomes were included, of whom 496 pregnant women (500 pregnancy outcomes) received ivermectin inadvertently during MDA campaigns in the observational studies and 397 pregnant women (399 pregnancy outcomes) purposely received ivermectin as part of the open-label RCT. No study reported neonatal deaths, maternal morbidity, preterm births, or low birthweight. It is unclear whether exposure to ivermectin during pregnancy increases the risk of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths (odds ratio [OR] 1·15 [95% CI 0·75−1·78] with very low certainty of evidence for the four observational studies and 0·62 [0·18−2·14] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT) or congenital anomalies (OR 1·69 [95% CI 0·83−3·41] with very low certainty of evidence for the five observational studies and 1·10 [0·07−17·65] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT). INTERPRETATION: There is insufficient evidence to conclude on the safety profile of ivermectin during pregnancy. Treatment campaigns should focus additional efforts on preventing inadvertent treatment of pregnant women. FUNDING: Unitaid. 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7613514/ /pubmed/31839144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30453-X Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nicolas, Patricia
Maia, Marta F
Bassat, Quique
Kobylinski, Kevin C
Monteiro, Wuelton
Rabinovich, N Regina
Menéndez, Clara
Bardají, Azucena
Chaccour, Carlos
Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31839144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30453-X
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolaspatricia safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maiamartaf safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bassatquique safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kobylinskikevinc safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT monteirowuelton safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rabinovichnregina safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT menendezclara safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bardajiazucena safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chaccourcarlos safetyoforalivermectinduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis