Cargando…

Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future

The classification of epilepsy is essential for people with epilepsy and their families, healthcare providers, physicians and researchers. The International League Against Epilepsy proposed updated seizure and epilepsy classifications in 2017, while another four-dimensional epilepsy classification w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shlobin, Nathan A., Singh, Gagandeep, Newton, Charles R., Sander, Josemir W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117515
_version_ 1783605489071816704
author Shlobin, Nathan A.
Singh, Gagandeep
Newton, Charles R.
Sander, Josemir W.
author_facet Shlobin, Nathan A.
Singh, Gagandeep
Newton, Charles R.
Sander, Josemir W.
author_sort Shlobin, Nathan A.
collection PubMed
description The classification of epilepsy is essential for people with epilepsy and their families, healthcare providers, physicians and researchers. The International League Against Epilepsy proposed updated seizure and epilepsy classifications in 2017, while another four-dimensional epilepsy classification was updated in 2019. An Integrated Epilepsy Classification system was proposed in 2020. Existing classifications, however, lack consideration of important pragmatic factors relevant to the day-to-day life of people with epilepsy and stakeholders. Despite promising developments, consideration of comorbidities in brain development, genetic causes, and environmental triggers of epilepsy remains largely user-dependent in existing classifications. Demographics of epilepsy have changed over time, while existing classification schemes exhibit caveats. A pragmatic classification scheme should incorporate these factors to provide a nuanced classification. Validation across disparate contexts will ensure widespread applicability and ease of use. A team-based approach may simplify communication between healthcare personnel, while an individual-centred perspective may empower people with epilepsy. Together, incorporating these elements into a modern but pragmatic classification scheme may ensure optimal care for people with epilepsy by emphasising cohesiveness among its myriad users. Technological advancements such as 7T MRI, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence may affect future classification efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7613525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76135252022-09-06 Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future Shlobin, Nathan A. Singh, Gagandeep Newton, Charles R. Sander, Josemir W. J Neurol Sci Article The classification of epilepsy is essential for people with epilepsy and their families, healthcare providers, physicians and researchers. The International League Against Epilepsy proposed updated seizure and epilepsy classifications in 2017, while another four-dimensional epilepsy classification was updated in 2019. An Integrated Epilepsy Classification system was proposed in 2020. Existing classifications, however, lack consideration of important pragmatic factors relevant to the day-to-day life of people with epilepsy and stakeholders. Despite promising developments, consideration of comorbidities in brain development, genetic causes, and environmental triggers of epilepsy remains largely user-dependent in existing classifications. Demographics of epilepsy have changed over time, while existing classification schemes exhibit caveats. A pragmatic classification scheme should incorporate these factors to provide a nuanced classification. Validation across disparate contexts will ensure widespread applicability and ease of use. A team-based approach may simplify communication between healthcare personnel, while an individual-centred perspective may empower people with epilepsy. Together, incorporating these elements into a modern but pragmatic classification scheme may ensure optimal care for people with epilepsy by emphasising cohesiveness among its myriad users. Technological advancements such as 7T MRI, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence may affect future classification efforts. 2021-08-15 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7613525/ /pubmed/34174531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117515 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) International license.
spellingShingle Article
Shlobin, Nathan A.
Singh, Gagandeep
Newton, Charles R.
Sander, Josemir W.
Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future
title Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future
title_full Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future
title_fullStr Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future
title_full_unstemmed Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future
title_short Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future
title_sort classifying epilepsy pragmatically: past, present, and future
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117515
work_keys_str_mv AT shlobinnathana classifyingepilepsypragmaticallypastpresentandfuture
AT singhgagandeep classifyingepilepsypragmaticallypastpresentandfuture
AT newtoncharlesr classifyingepilepsypragmaticallypastpresentandfuture
AT sanderjosemirw classifyingepilepsypragmaticallypastpresentandfuture