Cargando…

Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses of individual-level data from randomised trials are often required to detect clinically worthwhile effects. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, which includes data from numerous large long-term statin trials, is conducting a review of the effects of statin t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745221105509
_version_ 1783605528570626048
author Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration,
author_facet Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration,
author_sort Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration,
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses of individual-level data from randomised trials are often required to detect clinically worthwhile effects. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, which includes data from numerous large long-term statin trials, is conducting a review of the effects of statin therapy on all adverse events collected in those trials. This article describes the approaches used and challenges faced to systematically capture and categorise the data. METHODS: Protocols, statistical analysis plans, case report forms, clinical study reports and datasets were obtained, reviewed and checked. Relevant baseline and follow-up data from each trial was then reorganised into standardised formats based upon the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Study Data Tabulation Model. Adverse event data were organised and coded (automatically or, where necessary, manually) according to a common medical dictionary based upon the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. RESULTS: Data from 23 double-blind statin trials and 5 open-label statin trials were provided, either through direct data transfer or through online access platforms. Together, these trials provided 845 datasets containing over 38 million records relating to 30,495 study variables and 181,973 randomised participants. Of the 46 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Study Data Tabulation Model domains that could potentially have been used to organise the data, the 13 most relevant to the project were identified and utilised, including 6 domains related to post-randomisation adverse events. Nearly 1.2 million adverse events were extracted and mapped to over 45,000 unique adverse event terms. Of these adverse events, 99% were coded to a Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities ‘lower level term’, with the remainder coded to a ‘higher level term’ or, very rarely, only a ‘higher level group term’. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of adverse event data from the large randomised trials of statins, approaches based on common standards for data organisation and classification have provided a resource capable of allowing reliable and rapid evaluation of any previously unknown benefits or hazards of statin therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7613840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76138402022-11-23 Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, Clin Trials Articles BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses of individual-level data from randomised trials are often required to detect clinically worthwhile effects. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration, which includes data from numerous large long-term statin trials, is conducting a review of the effects of statin therapy on all adverse events collected in those trials. This article describes the approaches used and challenges faced to systematically capture and categorise the data. METHODS: Protocols, statistical analysis plans, case report forms, clinical study reports and datasets were obtained, reviewed and checked. Relevant baseline and follow-up data from each trial was then reorganised into standardised formats based upon the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Study Data Tabulation Model. Adverse event data were organised and coded (automatically or, where necessary, manually) according to a common medical dictionary based upon the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. RESULTS: Data from 23 double-blind statin trials and 5 open-label statin trials were provided, either through direct data transfer or through online access platforms. Together, these trials provided 845 datasets containing over 38 million records relating to 30,495 study variables and 181,973 randomised participants. Of the 46 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Study Data Tabulation Model domains that could potentially have been used to organise the data, the 13 most relevant to the project were identified and utilised, including 6 domains related to post-randomisation adverse events. Nearly 1.2 million adverse events were extracted and mapped to over 45,000 unique adverse event terms. Of these adverse events, 99% were coded to a Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities ‘lower level term’, with the remainder coded to a ‘higher level term’ or, very rarely, only a ‘higher level group term’. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of adverse event data from the large randomised trials of statins, approaches based on common standards for data organisation and classification have provided a resource capable of allowing reliable and rapid evaluation of any previously unknown benefits or hazards of statin therapy. SAGE Publications 2022-07-09 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7613840/ /pubmed/35815805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745221105509 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration,
Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy
title Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy
title_full Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy
title_fullStr Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy
title_full_unstemmed Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy
title_short Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy
title_sort harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745221105509
work_keys_str_mv AT cholesteroltreatmenttrialistscollaboration harmonisationoflargescaleheterogeneousindividualparticipantadverseeventdatafromrandomisedtrialsofstatintherapy