Cargando…
Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
Independent evaluations of grant applications by subject experts are an important part of the peer-review system. However, little is known about the real-time experiences of peer reviewers or experts who perform reviews of a grant application independently. This study sought to gain insight into thi...
Autores principales: | Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaёlle, Wheelock, Ana, Vandrevala, Tushna, Harries, Priscilla |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
por: Sutphin, Jessie, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
por: Guthrie, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications
por: Lee, Jung Hun, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review
por: Heaton-Shrestha, Celayne, et al.
Publicado: (2023)