Cargando…

Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view

Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmer, Veronika A., Gomez, Alberto, Skelton, Emily, Wright, Robert, Wheeler, Gavin, Deng, Shujie, Ghavami, Nooshin, Lloyd, Karen, Matthew, Jacqueline, Kainz, Bernhard, Rueckert, Daniel, Hajnal, Joseph V., Schnabel, Julia A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36257132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102639
_version_ 1783605552579870720
author Zimmer, Veronika A.
Gomez, Alberto
Skelton, Emily
Wright, Robert
Wheeler, Gavin
Deng, Shujie
Ghavami, Nooshin
Lloyd, Karen
Matthew, Jacqueline
Kainz, Bernhard
Rueckert, Daniel
Hajnal, Joseph V.
Schnabel, Julia A.
author_facet Zimmer, Veronika A.
Gomez, Alberto
Skelton, Emily
Wright, Robert
Wheeler, Gavin
Deng, Shujie
Ghavami, Nooshin
Lloyd, Karen
Matthew, Jacqueline
Kainz, Bernhard
Rueckert, Daniel
Hajnal, Joseph V.
Schnabel, Julia A.
author_sort Zimmer, Veronika A.
collection PubMed
description Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment at late gestation. In this work, we address these three challenges with a multi-task learning approach that combines the classification of placental location (e.g., anterior, posterior) and semantic placenta segmentation in a single convolutional neural network. Through the classification task the model can learn from larger and more diverse datasets while improving the accuracy of the segmentation task in particular in limited training set conditions. With this approach we investigate the variability in annotations from multiple raters and show that our automatic segmentations (Dice of 0.86 for anterior and 0.83 for posterior placentas) achieve human-level performance as compared to intra- and inter-observer variability. Lastly, our approach can deliver whole placenta segmentation using a multi-view US acquisition pipeline consisting of three stages: multi-probe image acquisition, image fusion and image segmentation. This results in high quality segmentation of larger structures such as the placenta in US with reduced image artifacts which are beyond the field-of-view of single probes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7614009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76140092023-01-03 Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view Zimmer, Veronika A. Gomez, Alberto Skelton, Emily Wright, Robert Wheeler, Gavin Deng, Shujie Ghavami, Nooshin Lloyd, Karen Matthew, Jacqueline Kainz, Bernhard Rueckert, Daniel Hajnal, Joseph V. Schnabel, Julia A. Med Image Anal Article Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment at late gestation. In this work, we address these three challenges with a multi-task learning approach that combines the classification of placental location (e.g., anterior, posterior) and semantic placenta segmentation in a single convolutional neural network. Through the classification task the model can learn from larger and more diverse datasets while improving the accuracy of the segmentation task in particular in limited training set conditions. With this approach we investigate the variability in annotations from multiple raters and show that our automatic segmentations (Dice of 0.86 for anterior and 0.83 for posterior placentas) achieve human-level performance as compared to intra- and inter-observer variability. Lastly, our approach can deliver whole placenta segmentation using a multi-view US acquisition pipeline consisting of three stages: multi-probe image acquisition, image fusion and image segmentation. This results in high quality segmentation of larger structures such as the placenta in US with reduced image artifacts which are beyond the field-of-view of single probes. 2022-09-28 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7614009/ /pubmed/36257132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102639 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) International license.
spellingShingle Article
Zimmer, Veronika A.
Gomez, Alberto
Skelton, Emily
Wright, Robert
Wheeler, Gavin
Deng, Shujie
Ghavami, Nooshin
Lloyd, Karen
Matthew, Jacqueline
Kainz, Bernhard
Rueckert, Daniel
Hajnal, Joseph V.
Schnabel, Julia A.
Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
title Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
title_full Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
title_fullStr Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
title_full_unstemmed Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
title_short Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
title_sort placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36257132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102639
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmerveronikaa placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT gomezalberto placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT skeltonemily placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT wrightrobert placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT wheelergavin placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT dengshujie placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT ghavaminooshin placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT lloydkaren placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT matthewjacqueline placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT kainzbernhard placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT rueckertdaniel placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT hajnaljosephv placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview
AT schnabeljuliaa placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview