Cargando…
Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view
Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36257132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102639 |
_version_ | 1783605552579870720 |
---|---|
author | Zimmer, Veronika A. Gomez, Alberto Skelton, Emily Wright, Robert Wheeler, Gavin Deng, Shujie Ghavami, Nooshin Lloyd, Karen Matthew, Jacqueline Kainz, Bernhard Rueckert, Daniel Hajnal, Joseph V. Schnabel, Julia A. |
author_facet | Zimmer, Veronika A. Gomez, Alberto Skelton, Emily Wright, Robert Wheeler, Gavin Deng, Shujie Ghavami, Nooshin Lloyd, Karen Matthew, Jacqueline Kainz, Bernhard Rueckert, Daniel Hajnal, Joseph V. Schnabel, Julia A. |
author_sort | Zimmer, Veronika A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment at late gestation. In this work, we address these three challenges with a multi-task learning approach that combines the classification of placental location (e.g., anterior, posterior) and semantic placenta segmentation in a single convolutional neural network. Through the classification task the model can learn from larger and more diverse datasets while improving the accuracy of the segmentation task in particular in limited training set conditions. With this approach we investigate the variability in annotations from multiple raters and show that our automatic segmentations (Dice of 0.86 for anterior and 0.83 for posterior placentas) achieve human-level performance as compared to intra- and inter-observer variability. Lastly, our approach can deliver whole placenta segmentation using a multi-view US acquisition pipeline consisting of three stages: multi-probe image acquisition, image fusion and image segmentation. This results in high quality segmentation of larger structures such as the placenta in US with reduced image artifacts which are beyond the field-of-view of single probes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7614009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76140092023-01-03 Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view Zimmer, Veronika A. Gomez, Alberto Skelton, Emily Wright, Robert Wheeler, Gavin Deng, Shujie Ghavami, Nooshin Lloyd, Karen Matthew, Jacqueline Kainz, Bernhard Rueckert, Daniel Hajnal, Joseph V. Schnabel, Julia A. Med Image Anal Article Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment at late gestation. In this work, we address these three challenges with a multi-task learning approach that combines the classification of placental location (e.g., anterior, posterior) and semantic placenta segmentation in a single convolutional neural network. Through the classification task the model can learn from larger and more diverse datasets while improving the accuracy of the segmentation task in particular in limited training set conditions. With this approach we investigate the variability in annotations from multiple raters and show that our automatic segmentations (Dice of 0.86 for anterior and 0.83 for posterior placentas) achieve human-level performance as compared to intra- and inter-observer variability. Lastly, our approach can deliver whole placenta segmentation using a multi-view US acquisition pipeline consisting of three stages: multi-probe image acquisition, image fusion and image segmentation. This results in high quality segmentation of larger structures such as the placenta in US with reduced image artifacts which are beyond the field-of-view of single probes. 2022-09-28 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7614009/ /pubmed/36257132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102639 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) International license. |
spellingShingle | Article Zimmer, Veronika A. Gomez, Alberto Skelton, Emily Wright, Robert Wheeler, Gavin Deng, Shujie Ghavami, Nooshin Lloyd, Karen Matthew, Jacqueline Kainz, Bernhard Rueckert, Daniel Hajnal, Joseph V. Schnabel, Julia A. Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view |
title | Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view |
title_full | Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view |
title_fullStr | Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view |
title_full_unstemmed | Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view |
title_short | Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view |
title_sort | placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36257132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zimmerveronikaa placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT gomezalberto placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT skeltonemily placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT wrightrobert placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT wheelergavin placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT dengshujie placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT ghavaminooshin placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT lloydkaren placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT matthewjacqueline placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT kainzbernhard placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT rueckertdaniel placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT hajnaljosephv placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview AT schnabeljuliaa placentasegmentationinultrasoundimagingaddressingsourcesofuncertaintyandlimitedfieldofview |