Cargando…
Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies
BACKGROUND: Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2 |
_version_ | 1783605579272421376 |
---|---|
author | Greenhalgh, Trisha Shaw, Sara E. Alvarez Nishio, Anica Byng, Richard Clarke, Aileen Dakin, Francesca Faulkner, Stuart Hemmings, Nina Husain, Laiba Kalin, Asli Ladds, Emma Moore, Lucy Rosen, Rebecca Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Wherton, Joseph Wieringa, Sietse |
author_facet | Greenhalgh, Trisha Shaw, Sara E. Alvarez Nishio, Anica Byng, Richard Clarke, Aileen Dakin, Francesca Faulkner, Stuart Hemmings, Nina Husain, Laiba Kalin, Asli Ladds, Emma Moore, Lucy Rosen, Rebecca Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Wherton, Joseph Wieringa, Sietse |
author_sort | Greenhalgh, Trisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in-person care, with recurrent waves of COVID-19 and various post-pandemic backlogs. METHODS: Mixed-methods (mostly qualitative) case study across 11 general practices. Researchers-in-residence have built relationships with practices and become familiar with their contexts and activities; they are following their progress for two years via staff and patient interviews, documents and ethnography, and supporting improvement efforts through co-design. In this paper, we report baseline data. RESULTS: Reflecting our maximum-variety sampling strategy, the 11 practices vary in size, setting, ethos, staffing, population demographics and digital maturity, but share common contextual features—notably system-level stressors such as high workload and staff shortages, and UK’s technical and regulatory infrastructure. We have identified both commonalities and differences between practices in terms of how they: 1] manage the ‘digital front door’ (access and triage) and balance demand and capacity; 2] strive for high standards of quality and safety; 3] ensure digital inclusion and mitigate wider inequalities; 4] support and train their staff (clinical and non-clinical), students and trainees; 5] select, install, pilot and use technologies and the digital infrastructure which support them; and 6] involve patients in their improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS: General practices’ responses to pandemic-induced disruptive innovation appear unique and situated. We anticipate that by focusing on depth and detail, this longitudinal study will throw light on why a solution that works well in one practice does not work at all in another. As the study unfolds, we will explore how practices achieve timely diagnosis of urgent or serious illness and manage continuity of care, long-term conditions and complex needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7614213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76142132023-02-21 Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies Greenhalgh, Trisha Shaw, Sara E. Alvarez Nishio, Anica Byng, Richard Clarke, Aileen Dakin, Francesca Faulkner, Stuart Hemmings, Nina Husain, Laiba Kalin, Asli Ladds, Emma Moore, Lucy Rosen, Rebecca Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Wherton, Joseph Wieringa, Sietse NIHR Open Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in-person care, with recurrent waves of COVID-19 and various post-pandemic backlogs. METHODS: Mixed-methods (mostly qualitative) case study across 11 general practices. Researchers-in-residence have built relationships with practices and become familiar with their contexts and activities; they are following their progress for two years via staff and patient interviews, documents and ethnography, and supporting improvement efforts through co-design. In this paper, we report baseline data. RESULTS: Reflecting our maximum-variety sampling strategy, the 11 practices vary in size, setting, ethos, staffing, population demographics and digital maturity, but share common contextual features—notably system-level stressors such as high workload and staff shortages, and UK’s technical and regulatory infrastructure. We have identified both commonalities and differences between practices in terms of how they: 1] manage the ‘digital front door’ (access and triage) and balance demand and capacity; 2] strive for high standards of quality and safety; 3] ensure digital inclusion and mitigate wider inequalities; 4] support and train their staff (clinical and non-clinical), students and trainees; 5] select, install, pilot and use technologies and the digital infrastructure which support them; and 6] involve patients in their improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS: General practices’ responses to pandemic-induced disruptive innovation appear unique and situated. We anticipate that by focusing on depth and detail, this longitudinal study will throw light on why a solution that works well in one practice does not work at all in another. As the study unfolds, we will explore how practices achieve timely diagnosis of urgent or serious illness and manage continuity of care, long-term conditions and complex needs. F1000 Research Limited 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7614213/ /pubmed/36814638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Greenhalgh T et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Greenhalgh, Trisha Shaw, Sara E. Alvarez Nishio, Anica Byng, Richard Clarke, Aileen Dakin, Francesca Faulkner, Stuart Hemmings, Nina Husain, Laiba Kalin, Asli Ladds, Emma Moore, Lucy Rosen, Rebecca Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Wherton, Joseph Wieringa, Sietse Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies |
title | Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies |
title_full | Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies |
title_fullStr | Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies |
title_short | Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies |
title_sort | remote care in uk general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenhalghtrisha remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT shawsarae remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT alvareznishioanica remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT byngrichard remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT clarkeaileen remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT dakinfrancesca remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT faulknerstuart remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT hemmingsnina remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT husainlaiba remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT kalinasli remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT laddsemma remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT moorelucy remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT rosenrebecca remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT rybczynskabuntsarah remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT whertonjoseph remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies AT wieringasietse remotecareinukgeneralpracticebaselinedataon11casestudies |