Cargando…

The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms

Surgical neuromodulation through implantable devices allows for stimulation delivery to subcortical regions, crucial for symptom control in many debilitating neurological conditions. Novel closed-loop algorithms deliver therapy tailor-made to endogenous physiological activity, however rely on precis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deli, Alceste, Toth, Robert, Zamora, Mayela, Divanbeighi Zand, Amir P., Green, Alexander L., Denison, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37249946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123850
_version_ 1783605621952610304
author Deli, Alceste
Toth, Robert
Zamora, Mayela
Divanbeighi Zand, Amir P.
Green, Alexander L.
Denison, Timothy
author_facet Deli, Alceste
Toth, Robert
Zamora, Mayela
Divanbeighi Zand, Amir P.
Green, Alexander L.
Denison, Timothy
author_sort Deli, Alceste
collection PubMed
description Surgical neuromodulation through implantable devices allows for stimulation delivery to subcortical regions, crucial for symptom control in many debilitating neurological conditions. Novel closed-loop algorithms deliver therapy tailor-made to endogenous physiological activity, however rely on precise sensing of signals such as subcortical oscillations. The frequency of such intrinsic activity can vary depending on subcortical target nucleus, while factors such as regional anatomy may also contribute to variability in sensing signals. While artefact parameters have been explored in more ‘standard’ and commonly used targets (such as the basal ganglia, which are implanted in movement disorders), characterisation in novel candidate nuclei is still under investigation. One such important area is the brainstem, which contains nuclei crucial for arousal and autonomic regulation. The brainstem provides additional implantation targets for treatment indications in disorders of consciousness and sleep, yet poses distinct anatomical challenges compared to central subcortical targets. Here we investigate the region-specific artefacts encountered during activity and rest while streaming data from brainstem implants with a cranially-mounted device in two patients. Such artefacts result from this complex anatomical environment and its interactions with physiological parameters such as head movement and cardiac functions. The implications of the micromotion-induced artefacts, and potential mitigation, are then considered for future closed-loop stimulation methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7614576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76145762023-05-26 The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms Deli, Alceste Toth, Robert Zamora, Mayela Divanbeighi Zand, Amir P. Green, Alexander L. Denison, Timothy Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng Article Surgical neuromodulation through implantable devices allows for stimulation delivery to subcortical regions, crucial for symptom control in many debilitating neurological conditions. Novel closed-loop algorithms deliver therapy tailor-made to endogenous physiological activity, however rely on precise sensing of signals such as subcortical oscillations. The frequency of such intrinsic activity can vary depending on subcortical target nucleus, while factors such as regional anatomy may also contribute to variability in sensing signals. While artefact parameters have been explored in more ‘standard’ and commonly used targets (such as the basal ganglia, which are implanted in movement disorders), characterisation in novel candidate nuclei is still under investigation. One such important area is the brainstem, which contains nuclei crucial for arousal and autonomic regulation. The brainstem provides additional implantation targets for treatment indications in disorders of consciousness and sleep, yet poses distinct anatomical challenges compared to central subcortical targets. Here we investigate the region-specific artefacts encountered during activity and rest while streaming data from brainstem implants with a cranially-mounted device in two patients. Such artefacts result from this complex anatomical environment and its interactions with physiological parameters such as head movement and cardiac functions. The implications of the micromotion-induced artefacts, and potential mitigation, are then considered for future closed-loop stimulation methods. 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7614576/ /pubmed/37249946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123850 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) International license.
spellingShingle Article
Deli, Alceste
Toth, Robert
Zamora, Mayela
Divanbeighi Zand, Amir P.
Green, Alexander L.
Denison, Timothy
The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms
title The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms
title_full The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms
title_fullStr The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms
title_short The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms
title_sort design of brainstem interfaces: characterisation of physiological artefacts and implications for closed-loop algorithms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37249946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123850
work_keys_str_mv AT delialceste thedesignofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT tothrobert thedesignofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT zamoramayela thedesignofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT divanbeighizandamirp thedesignofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT greenalexanderl thedesignofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT denisontimothy thedesignofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT delialceste designofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT tothrobert designofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT zamoramayela designofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT divanbeighizandamirp designofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT greenalexanderl designofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms
AT denisontimothy designofbrainsteminterfacescharacterisationofphysiologicalartefactsandimplicationsforclosedloopalgorithms