Cargando…

Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) acceptability and effect of surgical prevention on menopausal sequelae/satisfaction/regret in women at increased ovarian cancer (OC) risk. DESIGN: Multicentre, cohort, questionnaire study (IRSCTN:12310993). S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaba, F, Blyuss, O, Chandrasekaran, D, Osman, M, Goyal, S, Gan, C, Izatt, L, Tripathi, V, Esteban, I, McNicol, L, Ragupathy, K, Crawford, R, Evans, DG, Legood, R, Menon, U, Manchanda, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16424
_version_ 1783605641187688448
author Gaba, F
Blyuss, O
Chandrasekaran, D
Osman, M
Goyal, S
Gan, C
Izatt, L
Tripathi, V
Esteban, I
McNicol, L
Ragupathy, K
Crawford, R
Evans, DG
Legood, R
Menon, U
Manchanda, R
author_facet Gaba, F
Blyuss, O
Chandrasekaran, D
Osman, M
Goyal, S
Gan, C
Izatt, L
Tripathi, V
Esteban, I
McNicol, L
Ragupathy, K
Crawford, R
Evans, DG
Legood, R
Menon, U
Manchanda, R
author_sort Gaba, F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) acceptability and effect of surgical prevention on menopausal sequelae/satisfaction/regret in women at increased ovarian cancer (OC) risk. DESIGN: Multicentre, cohort, questionnaire study (IRSCTN:12310993). SETTING: United Kingdom (UK). POPULATION: UK women without OC >18 years, at increased OC risk, with/without previous RRSO, ascertained through specialist familial cancer/genetic clinics and BRCA support groups. METHODS: Participants completed a 39-item questionnaire. Baseline characteristics were described using descriptive statistics. Logistic/ linear regression models analysed the impact of variables on RRESDO acceptability and health outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES: RRESDO acceptability, menopausal sequelae, satisfaction/regret. RESULTS: In all, 346 of 683 participants underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Of premenopausal women who had not undergone RRSO, 69.1% (181/262) found it acceptable to participate in a research study offering RRESDO. Premenopausal women concerned about sexual dysfunction were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–7.7, P = 0.025). Women experiencing sexual dysfunction after premenopausal RRSO were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable in retrospect (OR = 5.3, 95% CI 1.2–27.5, P < 0.031). In all, 88.8% (143/161) premenopausal and 95.2% (80/84) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO, respectively, were satisfied with their decision, whereas 9.4% (15/160) premenopausal and 1.2% (1/81) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO regretted their decision. HRT uptake in premenopausal individuals without breast cancer (BC) was 74.1% (80/108). HRT use did not significantly affect satisfaction/regret levels but did reduce symptoms of vaginal dryness (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Data show high RRESDO acceptability, particularly in women concerned about sexual dysfunction. Although RRSO satisfaction remains high, regret rates are much higher for premenopausal women than for postmenopausal women. HRT use following premenopausal RRSO does not increase satisfaction but does reduce vaginal dryness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7614715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76147152023-07-03 Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study Gaba, F Blyuss, O Chandrasekaran, D Osman, M Goyal, S Gan, C Izatt, L Tripathi, V Esteban, I McNicol, L Ragupathy, K Crawford, R Evans, DG Legood, R Menon, U Manchanda, R BJOG Article OBJECTIVE: To determine risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) acceptability and effect of surgical prevention on menopausal sequelae/satisfaction/regret in women at increased ovarian cancer (OC) risk. DESIGN: Multicentre, cohort, questionnaire study (IRSCTN:12310993). SETTING: United Kingdom (UK). POPULATION: UK women without OC >18 years, at increased OC risk, with/without previous RRSO, ascertained through specialist familial cancer/genetic clinics and BRCA support groups. METHODS: Participants completed a 39-item questionnaire. Baseline characteristics were described using descriptive statistics. Logistic/ linear regression models analysed the impact of variables on RRESDO acceptability and health outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES: RRESDO acceptability, menopausal sequelae, satisfaction/regret. RESULTS: In all, 346 of 683 participants underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Of premenopausal women who had not undergone RRSO, 69.1% (181/262) found it acceptable to participate in a research study offering RRESDO. Premenopausal women concerned about sexual dysfunction were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–7.7, P = 0.025). Women experiencing sexual dysfunction after premenopausal RRSO were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable in retrospect (OR = 5.3, 95% CI 1.2–27.5, P < 0.031). In all, 88.8% (143/161) premenopausal and 95.2% (80/84) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO, respectively, were satisfied with their decision, whereas 9.4% (15/160) premenopausal and 1.2% (1/81) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO regretted their decision. HRT uptake in premenopausal individuals without breast cancer (BC) was 74.1% (80/108). HRT use did not significantly affect satisfaction/regret levels but did reduce symptoms of vaginal dryness (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Data show high RRESDO acceptability, particularly in women concerned about sexual dysfunction. Although RRSO satisfaction remains high, regret rates are much higher for premenopausal women than for postmenopausal women. HRT use following premenopausal RRSO does not increase satisfaction but does reduce vaginal dryness. 2021-03-01 2020-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7614715/ /pubmed/32803845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16424 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gaba, F
Blyuss, O
Chandrasekaran, D
Osman, M
Goyal, S
Gan, C
Izatt, L
Tripathi, V
Esteban, I
McNicol, L
Ragupathy, K
Crawford, R
Evans, DG
Legood, R
Menon, U
Manchanda, R
Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study
title Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study
title_full Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study
title_fullStr Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study
title_short Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study
title_sort attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16424
work_keys_str_mv AT gabaf attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT blyusso attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT chandrasekarand attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT osmanm attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT goyals attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT ganc attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT izattl attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT tripathiv attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT estebani attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT mcnicoll attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT ragupathyk attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT crawfordr attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT evansdg attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT legoodr attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT menonu attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy
AT manchandar attitudestowardsriskreducingearlysalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomyforovariancancerpreventionacohortstudy