Cargando…

Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether risks of stillbirth and neonatal death differ after fresh and frozen embryo transfer (fresh and frozen-ET) compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance. DESIGN: Population-based cohort. SETTING: Data linkage between the nationwide Medical Birth Regis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westvik-Johari, Kjersti, Lawlor, Deborah A, Romundstad, Liv Bente, Bergh, Christina, Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt, Gissler, Mika, Henningsen, Anna-Karina A, Håberg, Siri E, Tiitinen, Aila, Spangmose, Anne Lærke, Pinborg, Anja, Opdahl, Signe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7615319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020
_version_ 1785145791899238400
author Westvik-Johari, Kjersti
Lawlor, Deborah A
Romundstad, Liv Bente
Bergh, Christina
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
Gissler, Mika
Henningsen, Anna-Karina A
Håberg, Siri E
Tiitinen, Aila
Spangmose, Anne Lærke
Pinborg, Anja
Opdahl, Signe
author_facet Westvik-Johari, Kjersti
Lawlor, Deborah A
Romundstad, Liv Bente
Bergh, Christina
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
Gissler, Mika
Henningsen, Anna-Karina A
Håberg, Siri E
Tiitinen, Aila
Spangmose, Anne Lærke
Pinborg, Anja
Opdahl, Signe
author_sort Westvik-Johari, Kjersti
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether risks of stillbirth and neonatal death differ after fresh and frozen embryo transfer (fresh and frozen-ET) compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance. DESIGN: Population-based cohort. SETTING: Data linkage between the nationwide Medical Birth Registries in Denmark (1994-2014), Norway and Sweden (1988-2015), and national quality registries and databases on assisted reproductive technology. PATIENTS: 4,590,853 singletons, including 78,642 conceived by fresh transfer and 18,084 by frozen-ET. INTERVENTION: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stillbirth (fetal death before and during delivery) and neonatal death (live born with death 0-27 days postpartum). RESULTS: Overall, 17,123 (0.37%) singletons were stillborn and 7,685 (0.17%) died neonatally. Compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance, the odds of stillbirth were similar after fresh and frozen-ET, while odds of neonatal death were higher after fresh (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-1.95) and frozen-ET (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.08-2.10). Preterm birth (<37 gestational weeks) was more common after fresh (8.0%) and frozen-ET (6.6%) compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance (5.0%), and strongly associated with neonatal mortality across all conception methods. Within gestational age categories, risk of stillbirth and neonatal death was similar for all conception methods, except that singletons from fresh-ET had a higher risk of stillbirth during gestational week 22-27 (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.51-2.26). CONCLUSION: Overall risk of stillbirth was similar after fresh and frozen-ET compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance, whereas neonatal mortality was higher, possibly mediated by the higher risk of preterm birth when compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance. Our results gave no clear support for choosing one treatment over the other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7615319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76153192023-11-20 Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety Westvik-Johari, Kjersti Lawlor, Deborah A Romundstad, Liv Bente Bergh, Christina Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt Gissler, Mika Henningsen, Anna-Karina A Håberg, Siri E Tiitinen, Aila Spangmose, Anne Lærke Pinborg, Anja Opdahl, Signe Fertil Steril Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether risks of stillbirth and neonatal death differ after fresh and frozen embryo transfer (fresh and frozen-ET) compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance. DESIGN: Population-based cohort. SETTING: Data linkage between the nationwide Medical Birth Registries in Denmark (1994-2014), Norway and Sweden (1988-2015), and national quality registries and databases on assisted reproductive technology. PATIENTS: 4,590,853 singletons, including 78,642 conceived by fresh transfer and 18,084 by frozen-ET. INTERVENTION: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stillbirth (fetal death before and during delivery) and neonatal death (live born with death 0-27 days postpartum). RESULTS: Overall, 17,123 (0.37%) singletons were stillborn and 7,685 (0.17%) died neonatally. Compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance, the odds of stillbirth were similar after fresh and frozen-ET, while odds of neonatal death were higher after fresh (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-1.95) and frozen-ET (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.08-2.10). Preterm birth (<37 gestational weeks) was more common after fresh (8.0%) and frozen-ET (6.6%) compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance (5.0%), and strongly associated with neonatal mortality across all conception methods. Within gestational age categories, risk of stillbirth and neonatal death was similar for all conception methods, except that singletons from fresh-ET had a higher risk of stillbirth during gestational week 22-27 (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.51-2.26). CONCLUSION: Overall risk of stillbirth was similar after fresh and frozen-ET compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance, whereas neonatal mortality was higher, possibly mediated by the higher risk of preterm birth when compared to singletons conceived without medical assistance. Our results gave no clear support for choosing one treatment over the other. 2023-02-01 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7615319/ /pubmed/36567207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) International license.
spellingShingle Article
Westvik-Johari, Kjersti
Lawlor, Deborah A
Romundstad, Liv Bente
Bergh, Christina
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
Gissler, Mika
Henningsen, Anna-Karina A
Håberg, Siri E
Tiitinen, Aila
Spangmose, Anne Lærke
Pinborg, Anja
Opdahl, Signe
Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety
title Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety
title_full Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety
title_fullStr Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety
title_full_unstemmed Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety
title_short Risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safety
title_sort risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. cohort study from the committee of nordic assisted reproduction technology and safety
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7615319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020
work_keys_str_mv AT westvikjoharikjersti riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT lawlordeboraha riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT romundstadlivbente riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT berghchristina riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT wennerholmullabritt riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT gisslermika riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT henningsenannakarinaa riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT habergsirie riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT tiitinenaila riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT spangmoseannelærke riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT pinborganja riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety
AT opdahlsigne riskofstillbirthandneonataldeathinsingletonsbornafterfreshandfrozenembryotransfercohortstudyfromthecommitteeofnordicassistedreproductiontechnologyandsafety