Cargando…

Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma is a high accurate test for prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Although it has been reported to be cost effective as a contingent test, evidence about its budget impact is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nshimyumukiza, L., Beaumont, J. A., Rousseau, F., Reinharz, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00245-5
_version_ 1783605744820551680
author Nshimyumukiza, L.
Beaumont, J. A.
Rousseau, F.
Reinharz, D.
author_facet Nshimyumukiza, L.
Beaumont, J. A.
Rousseau, F.
Reinharz, D.
author_sort Nshimyumukiza, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma is a high accurate test for prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Although it has been reported to be cost effective as a contingent test, evidence about its budget impact is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, using computer simulations, the budget impact of implementing NIPT as a contingent test in the Quebec Program of screening for Trisomy 21. METHODS: A semi-Markov analytic model built to simulate the budget impact of implementing NIPT into the current Quebec Trisomy 21 public Prenatal Screening, Serum Integrated prenatal screening (SIPS). Comparisons were made for a virtual population similar to that of expected Quebec pregnant women in 2015 in terms of size and age. Data input parameters were retrieved from a thorough literature search and in government databases, especially data from Quebec Program of screening for Trisomy 21. The 2015–2016 fiscal year budget impact was estimated from the Quebec healthcare system perspective and was expressed as the difference in the overall costs between the two alternatives (SIPS minus SPS + NIPT). RESULTS: Our study found that, at a baseline cost for NIPT of CAD$ 795, NIPT as a second-tier test offered to high-risk women identified by current screening program (SIPS + NIPT) may be affordable for Quebec health care system. Compared to the current screening program, it would be implemented at a neutral cost, considering a modest annual savings of $ 80,432 (95% CI $ 79, $ 874–$ 81,462). Results were sensitive to the NIPT costs and the uptake-rate of invasive diagnostic tests. CONCLUSION: Introducing NIPT as a contingent test in the Quebec Trisomy 21 screening program is an affordable strategy compared to the current practice. Further research is needed to confirm if our results can be reproduced in other healthcare jurisdictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76404222020-11-04 Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis Nshimyumukiza, L. Beaumont, J. A. Rousseau, F. Reinharz, D. Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma is a high accurate test for prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Although it has been reported to be cost effective as a contingent test, evidence about its budget impact is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, using computer simulations, the budget impact of implementing NIPT as a contingent test in the Quebec Program of screening for Trisomy 21. METHODS: A semi-Markov analytic model built to simulate the budget impact of implementing NIPT into the current Quebec Trisomy 21 public Prenatal Screening, Serum Integrated prenatal screening (SIPS). Comparisons were made for a virtual population similar to that of expected Quebec pregnant women in 2015 in terms of size and age. Data input parameters were retrieved from a thorough literature search and in government databases, especially data from Quebec Program of screening for Trisomy 21. The 2015–2016 fiscal year budget impact was estimated from the Quebec healthcare system perspective and was expressed as the difference in the overall costs between the two alternatives (SIPS minus SPS + NIPT). RESULTS: Our study found that, at a baseline cost for NIPT of CAD$ 795, NIPT as a second-tier test offered to high-risk women identified by current screening program (SIPS + NIPT) may be affordable for Quebec health care system. Compared to the current screening program, it would be implemented at a neutral cost, considering a modest annual savings of $ 80,432 (95% CI $ 79, $ 874–$ 81,462). Results were sensitive to the NIPT costs and the uptake-rate of invasive diagnostic tests. CONCLUSION: Introducing NIPT as a contingent test in the Quebec Trisomy 21 screening program is an affordable strategy compared to the current practice. Further research is needed to confirm if our results can be reproduced in other healthcare jurisdictions. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7640422/ /pubmed/33292318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00245-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nshimyumukiza, L.
Beaumont, J. A.
Rousseau, F.
Reinharz, D.
Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis
title Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis
title_full Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis
title_fullStr Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis
title_full_unstemmed Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis
title_short Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis
title_sort introducing cell-free dna noninvasive testing in a down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00245-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nshimyumukizal introducingcellfreednanoninvasivetestinginadownsyndromepublichealthscreeningprogramabudgetimpactanalysis
AT beaumontja introducingcellfreednanoninvasivetestinginadownsyndromepublichealthscreeningprogramabudgetimpactanalysis
AT rousseauf introducingcellfreednanoninvasivetestinginadownsyndromepublichealthscreeningprogramabudgetimpactanalysis
AT reinharzd introducingcellfreednanoninvasivetestinginadownsyndromepublichealthscreeningprogramabudgetimpactanalysis