Cargando…

The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy (IDAP) affects 11–18% of Australian pregnancies and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. National prescribing data suggests the use of intravenous iron in pregnancy is increasingly common. This study aimed to: 1) Establish the current patter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith-Wade, Sarah, Kidson-Gerber, Giselle, Shand, Antonia, Grzeskowiak, Luke, Henry, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03363-3
_version_ 1783605747983056896
author Smith-Wade, Sarah
Kidson-Gerber, Giselle
Shand, Antonia
Grzeskowiak, Luke
Henry, Amanda
author_facet Smith-Wade, Sarah
Kidson-Gerber, Giselle
Shand, Antonia
Grzeskowiak, Luke
Henry, Amanda
author_sort Smith-Wade, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy (IDAP) affects 11–18% of Australian pregnancies and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. National prescribing data suggests the use of intravenous iron in pregnancy is increasingly common. This study aimed to: 1) Establish the current patterns of intravenous iron use by Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians (FRANZCOG) when treating iron deficiency and IDAP including immediately postpartum and; 2) Assess FRANZCOG opinions regarding potential trial of intravenous iron for first-line treatment of IDAP. METHODS: An online survey of RANZCOG Fellows practicing obstetrics was distributed in September 2018. Results were analysed descriptively and responses compared by clinician demographics using Chi-squared testing. RESULTS: Of 484 respondents (21% of FRANZCOG), 457 were currently practicing obstetrics. Most prescribed intravenous iron in pregnancy (96%) and/or postpartum (85%). Most intravenous iron was prescribed for IDAP (98%) rather than iron deficiency without anaemia (53%), and for IDAP most commonly second-line to failed oral iron supplementation and first-line in special circumstances (59%). Intravenous iron prescribing was associated with shorter time since FRANZCOG completion (p = 0.01), public hospital practice (p = 0.008) and higher hospital birth numbers (p = 0.01). Most respondents (90%) would consider a randomised controlled trial of first-line intravenous iron for IDAP, although views on appropriate thresholds differed. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all respondents prescribed intravenous iron for IDAP, and while mostly used for second-line treatment over half sometimes used it first-line. With accelerating intravenous iron use, further research is required into its optimal use in pregnancy, recognizing important clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03363-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76404372020-11-04 The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians Smith-Wade, Sarah Kidson-Gerber, Giselle Shand, Antonia Grzeskowiak, Luke Henry, Amanda BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy (IDAP) affects 11–18% of Australian pregnancies and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. National prescribing data suggests the use of intravenous iron in pregnancy is increasingly common. This study aimed to: 1) Establish the current patterns of intravenous iron use by Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians (FRANZCOG) when treating iron deficiency and IDAP including immediately postpartum and; 2) Assess FRANZCOG opinions regarding potential trial of intravenous iron for first-line treatment of IDAP. METHODS: An online survey of RANZCOG Fellows practicing obstetrics was distributed in September 2018. Results were analysed descriptively and responses compared by clinician demographics using Chi-squared testing. RESULTS: Of 484 respondents (21% of FRANZCOG), 457 were currently practicing obstetrics. Most prescribed intravenous iron in pregnancy (96%) and/or postpartum (85%). Most intravenous iron was prescribed for IDAP (98%) rather than iron deficiency without anaemia (53%), and for IDAP most commonly second-line to failed oral iron supplementation and first-line in special circumstances (59%). Intravenous iron prescribing was associated with shorter time since FRANZCOG completion (p = 0.01), public hospital practice (p = 0.008) and higher hospital birth numbers (p = 0.01). Most respondents (90%) would consider a randomised controlled trial of first-line intravenous iron for IDAP, although views on appropriate thresholds differed. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all respondents prescribed intravenous iron for IDAP, and while mostly used for second-line treatment over half sometimes used it first-line. With accelerating intravenous iron use, further research is required into its optimal use in pregnancy, recognizing important clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03363-3. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7640437/ /pubmed/33148203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03363-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith-Wade, Sarah
Kidson-Gerber, Giselle
Shand, Antonia
Grzeskowiak, Luke
Henry, Amanda
The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians
title The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians
title_full The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians
title_fullStr The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians
title_full_unstemmed The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians
title_short The use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? A survey of Australian and New Zealand obstetricians
title_sort use of intravenous iron in pregnancy: for whom and when? a survey of australian and new zealand obstetricians
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03363-3
work_keys_str_mv AT smithwadesarah theuseofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT kidsongerbergiselle theuseofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT shandantonia theuseofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT grzeskowiakluke theuseofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT henryamanda theuseofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT smithwadesarah useofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT kidsongerbergiselle useofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT shandantonia useofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT grzeskowiakluke useofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians
AT henryamanda useofintravenousironinpregnancyforwhomandwhenasurveyofaustralianandnewzealandobstetricians