Cargando…

Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen

BACKGROUND: Fixed prosthodontics require an accurate impression for the teeth and the area to be restored for the laboratory to fabricate the desired restoration without mistakes. This study evaluated the quality of impressions received by private laboratories for the fabrication of fixed prosthesis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Odinee, Nusaiba M., Al-Hamzi, Mohsen, Al-shami, Ibrahim Z., Madfa, Ahmed, Al-Kholani, Abdulwahab I., Al-Olofi, Yazeed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01294-1
_version_ 1783605754337427456
author Al-Odinee, Nusaiba M.
Al-Hamzi, Mohsen
Al-shami, Ibrahim Z.
Madfa, Ahmed
Al-Kholani, Abdulwahab I.
Al-Olofi, Yazeed M.
author_facet Al-Odinee, Nusaiba M.
Al-Hamzi, Mohsen
Al-shami, Ibrahim Z.
Madfa, Ahmed
Al-Kholani, Abdulwahab I.
Al-Olofi, Yazeed M.
author_sort Al-Odinee, Nusaiba M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fixed prosthodontics require an accurate impression for the teeth and the area to be restored for the laboratory to fabricate the desired restoration without mistakes. This study evaluated the quality of impressions received by private laboratories for the fabrication of fixed prosthesis by describing the frequency of clinically detectable errors and by analyzing association between the various factors involved. METHODS: 165 impressions were collected from four dental laboratories. Jaw involved, type of tray, size of tray, number of prepared units, type of impression materials, techniques and viscosity in case of elastomeric impressions and type of prosthesis requested were recorded. Data referring to errors and visible defects including errors in finish line, in preparation area, in silicone impression technique and blood in impression were also documented. Factors affecting errors present were also assessed. Association between dentist gender and experience years and impression errors was assessed. Chi square and Fisher exact tests used to examine the association between categorical variables and outcomes. RESULTS: The total of error considering not immediately pouring as an error. Alginate was the most impression used. of impressions evaluated (50.9%), 97% were have at least one visible error; 92.1% had errors in finish line, 53.9% had errors in preparation area and (72.8%) of elastomeric impressions were have at least one error in technique. Blood in impression was detected in 52.1% of impressions. Significant association was found between material type and errors in finishing line and preparation area. Significant relationships were found between gender and errors in silicone impression technique (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, high frequency of detectable errors was found in fixed prosthesis impressions received by private dental laboratories. This high frequency is of serious concern, as this will result in poor fitted fixed prosthesis provided to patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76404782020-11-04 Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen Al-Odinee, Nusaiba M. Al-Hamzi, Mohsen Al-shami, Ibrahim Z. Madfa, Ahmed Al-Kholani, Abdulwahab I. Al-Olofi, Yazeed M. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Fixed prosthodontics require an accurate impression for the teeth and the area to be restored for the laboratory to fabricate the desired restoration without mistakes. This study evaluated the quality of impressions received by private laboratories for the fabrication of fixed prosthesis by describing the frequency of clinically detectable errors and by analyzing association between the various factors involved. METHODS: 165 impressions were collected from four dental laboratories. Jaw involved, type of tray, size of tray, number of prepared units, type of impression materials, techniques and viscosity in case of elastomeric impressions and type of prosthesis requested were recorded. Data referring to errors and visible defects including errors in finish line, in preparation area, in silicone impression technique and blood in impression were also documented. Factors affecting errors present were also assessed. Association between dentist gender and experience years and impression errors was assessed. Chi square and Fisher exact tests used to examine the association between categorical variables and outcomes. RESULTS: The total of error considering not immediately pouring as an error. Alginate was the most impression used. of impressions evaluated (50.9%), 97% were have at least one visible error; 92.1% had errors in finish line, 53.9% had errors in preparation area and (72.8%) of elastomeric impressions were have at least one error in technique. Blood in impression was detected in 52.1% of impressions. Significant association was found between material type and errors in finishing line and preparation area. Significant relationships were found between gender and errors in silicone impression technique (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, high frequency of detectable errors was found in fixed prosthesis impressions received by private dental laboratories. This high frequency is of serious concern, as this will result in poor fitted fixed prosthesis provided to patients. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7640478/ /pubmed/33148226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01294-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Al-Odinee, Nusaiba M.
Al-Hamzi, Mohsen
Al-shami, Ibrahim Z.
Madfa, Ahmed
Al-Kholani, Abdulwahab I.
Al-Olofi, Yazeed M.
Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen
title Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen
title_full Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen
title_fullStr Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen
title_short Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen
title_sort evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from yemen
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01294-1
work_keys_str_mv AT alodineenusaibam evaluationofthequalityoffixedprosthesisimpressionsinprivatelaboratoriesinasamplefromyemen
AT alhamzimohsen evaluationofthequalityoffixedprosthesisimpressionsinprivatelaboratoriesinasamplefromyemen
AT alshamiibrahimz evaluationofthequalityoffixedprosthesisimpressionsinprivatelaboratoriesinasamplefromyemen
AT madfaahmed evaluationofthequalityoffixedprosthesisimpressionsinprivatelaboratoriesinasamplefromyemen
AT alkholaniabdulwahabi evaluationofthequalityoffixedprosthesisimpressionsinprivatelaboratoriesinasamplefromyemen
AT alolofiyazeedm evaluationofthequalityoffixedprosthesisimpressionsinprivatelaboratoriesinasamplefromyemen