Cargando…

Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake. DESIGN: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chantler, Tracey, Pringle, Ellen, Bell, Sadie, Cooper, Rosie, Edmundson, Emily, Nielsen, Heidi, Roberts, Sheila, Edelstein, Michael, Mounier-Jack, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963
_version_ 1783605760613154816
author Chantler, Tracey
Pringle, Ellen
Bell, Sadie
Cooper, Rosie
Edmundson, Emily
Nielsen, Heidi
Roberts, Sheila
Edelstein, Michael
Mounier-Jack, Sandra
author_facet Chantler, Tracey
Pringle, Ellen
Bell, Sadie
Cooper, Rosie
Edmundson, Emily
Nielsen, Heidi
Roberts, Sheila
Edelstein, Michael
Mounier-Jack, Sandra
author_sort Chantler, Tracey
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake. DESIGN: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to examine the usability and acceptability of the intervention and quantitative methods to assess its impact. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The intervention was piloted in 14 secondary schools in seven London boroughs in 2018. Intervention schools were matched with schools using paper consent based on the proportion of students with English as a second language and students receiving free school meals. Participants included nurses, data managers, school-link staff, parents and adolescents. INTERVENTIONS: An electronic consent portal where parents could record whether they agreed to or declined vaccination, and nurses could access data to help them manage the immunisation programme. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of consent form return rates and HPV vaccine uptake between intervention and matched schools. RESULTS: HPV vaccination uptake did not differ between intervention and matched schools, but timely consent form return was significantly lower in intervention schools (73.3% vs 91.6%, p=0.008). The transition to using electronic consent was not straightforward, while schools and staff understood the potential benefits, they found it difficult to adapt to new ways of working which removed some level of control from schools. Reasons for lower consent form return in e-consent schools included difficulties encountered by some parents in accessing and using the intervention. Adolescents highlighted the potential for electronic consent to by-pass their information needs. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot intervention did not improve consent form return or vaccine uptake due to challenges encountered in transitioning to new working practice. New technologies require embedding before they become incorporated in everyday practice. A re-evaluation once stakeholders are accustomed with electronic consent may be required to understand its impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76405142020-11-10 Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention Chantler, Tracey Pringle, Ellen Bell, Sadie Cooper, Rosie Edmundson, Emily Nielsen, Heidi Roberts, Sheila Edelstein, Michael Mounier-Jack, Sandra BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake. DESIGN: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to examine the usability and acceptability of the intervention and quantitative methods to assess its impact. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The intervention was piloted in 14 secondary schools in seven London boroughs in 2018. Intervention schools were matched with schools using paper consent based on the proportion of students with English as a second language and students receiving free school meals. Participants included nurses, data managers, school-link staff, parents and adolescents. INTERVENTIONS: An electronic consent portal where parents could record whether they agreed to or declined vaccination, and nurses could access data to help them manage the immunisation programme. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of consent form return rates and HPV vaccine uptake between intervention and matched schools. RESULTS: HPV vaccination uptake did not differ between intervention and matched schools, but timely consent form return was significantly lower in intervention schools (73.3% vs 91.6%, p=0.008). The transition to using electronic consent was not straightforward, while schools and staff understood the potential benefits, they found it difficult to adapt to new ways of working which removed some level of control from schools. Reasons for lower consent form return in e-consent schools included difficulties encountered by some parents in accessing and using the intervention. Adolescents highlighted the potential for electronic consent to by-pass their information needs. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot intervention did not improve consent form return or vaccine uptake due to challenges encountered in transitioning to new working practice. New technologies require embedding before they become incorporated in everyday practice. A re-evaluation once stakeholders are accustomed with electronic consent may be required to understand its impact. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640514/ /pubmed/33148741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Chantler, Tracey
Pringle, Ellen
Bell, Sadie
Cooper, Rosie
Edmundson, Emily
Nielsen, Heidi
Roberts, Sheila
Edelstein, Michael
Mounier-Jack, Sandra
Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
title Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
title_full Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
title_fullStr Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
title_full_unstemmed Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
title_short Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
title_sort does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of hpv vaccination in adolescent girls? a mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963
work_keys_str_mv AT chantlertracey doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT pringleellen doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT bellsadie doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT cooperrosie doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT edmundsonemily doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT nielsenheidi doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT robertssheila doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT edelsteinmichael doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention
AT mounierjacksandra doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention