Cargando…
Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake. DESIGN: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963 |
_version_ | 1783605760613154816 |
---|---|
author | Chantler, Tracey Pringle, Ellen Bell, Sadie Cooper, Rosie Edmundson, Emily Nielsen, Heidi Roberts, Sheila Edelstein, Michael Mounier-Jack, Sandra |
author_facet | Chantler, Tracey Pringle, Ellen Bell, Sadie Cooper, Rosie Edmundson, Emily Nielsen, Heidi Roberts, Sheila Edelstein, Michael Mounier-Jack, Sandra |
author_sort | Chantler, Tracey |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake. DESIGN: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to examine the usability and acceptability of the intervention and quantitative methods to assess its impact. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The intervention was piloted in 14 secondary schools in seven London boroughs in 2018. Intervention schools were matched with schools using paper consent based on the proportion of students with English as a second language and students receiving free school meals. Participants included nurses, data managers, school-link staff, parents and adolescents. INTERVENTIONS: An electronic consent portal where parents could record whether they agreed to or declined vaccination, and nurses could access data to help them manage the immunisation programme. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of consent form return rates and HPV vaccine uptake between intervention and matched schools. RESULTS: HPV vaccination uptake did not differ between intervention and matched schools, but timely consent form return was significantly lower in intervention schools (73.3% vs 91.6%, p=0.008). The transition to using electronic consent was not straightforward, while schools and staff understood the potential benefits, they found it difficult to adapt to new ways of working which removed some level of control from schools. Reasons for lower consent form return in e-consent schools included difficulties encountered by some parents in accessing and using the intervention. Adolescents highlighted the potential for electronic consent to by-pass their information needs. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot intervention did not improve consent form return or vaccine uptake due to challenges encountered in transitioning to new working practice. New technologies require embedding before they become incorporated in everyday practice. A re-evaluation once stakeholders are accustomed with electronic consent may be required to understand its impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7640514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76405142020-11-10 Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention Chantler, Tracey Pringle, Ellen Bell, Sadie Cooper, Rosie Edmundson, Emily Nielsen, Heidi Roberts, Sheila Edelstein, Michael Mounier-Jack, Sandra BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of an electronic consent pilot intervention for school-based immunisations and assess its impact on consent form returns and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake. DESIGN: Mixed-methods theory-informed study applying qualitative methods to examine the usability and acceptability of the intervention and quantitative methods to assess its impact. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The intervention was piloted in 14 secondary schools in seven London boroughs in 2018. Intervention schools were matched with schools using paper consent based on the proportion of students with English as a second language and students receiving free school meals. Participants included nurses, data managers, school-link staff, parents and adolescents. INTERVENTIONS: An electronic consent portal where parents could record whether they agreed to or declined vaccination, and nurses could access data to help them manage the immunisation programme. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of consent form return rates and HPV vaccine uptake between intervention and matched schools. RESULTS: HPV vaccination uptake did not differ between intervention and matched schools, but timely consent form return was significantly lower in intervention schools (73.3% vs 91.6%, p=0.008). The transition to using electronic consent was not straightforward, while schools and staff understood the potential benefits, they found it difficult to adapt to new ways of working which removed some level of control from schools. Reasons for lower consent form return in e-consent schools included difficulties encountered by some parents in accessing and using the intervention. Adolescents highlighted the potential for electronic consent to by-pass their information needs. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot intervention did not improve consent form return or vaccine uptake due to challenges encountered in transitioning to new working practice. New technologies require embedding before they become incorporated in everyday practice. A re-evaluation once stakeholders are accustomed with electronic consent may be required to understand its impact. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640514/ /pubmed/33148741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Chantler, Tracey Pringle, Ellen Bell, Sadie Cooper, Rosie Edmundson, Emily Nielsen, Heidi Roberts, Sheila Edelstein, Michael Mounier-Jack, Sandra Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention |
title | Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention |
title_full | Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention |
title_fullStr | Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention |
title_short | Does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls? A mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention |
title_sort | does electronic consent improve the logistics and uptake of hpv vaccination in adolescent girls? a mixed-methods theory informed evaluation of a pilot intervention |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chantlertracey doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT pringleellen doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT bellsadie doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT cooperrosie doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT edmundsonemily doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT nielsenheidi doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT robertssheila doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT edelsteinmichael doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention AT mounierjacksandra doeselectronicconsentimprovethelogisticsanduptakeofhpvvaccinationinadolescentgirlsamixedmethodstheoryinformedevaluationofapilotintervention |