Cargando…

MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

INTRODUCTION: Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasper, Jürgen, Lühnen, Julia, Hinneburg, Jana, Siebenhofer, Andrea, Posch, Nicole, Berger-Höger, Birte, Grafe, Alexander, Keppler, Jan, Steckelberg, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
_version_ 1783605762785804288
author Kasper, Jürgen
Lühnen, Julia
Hinneburg, Jana
Siebenhofer, Andrea
Posch, Nicole
Berger-Höger, Birte
Grafe, Alexander
Keppler, Jan
Steckelberg, A
author_facet Kasper, Jürgen
Lühnen, Julia
Hinneburg, Jana
Siebenhofer, Andrea
Posch, Nicole
Berger-Höger, Birte
Grafe, Alexander
Keppler, Jan
Steckelberg, A
author_sort Kasper, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using ‘think aloud’ in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: AsPredected22546; date of registration: 24 July 2019. PROTOCOL VERSION: July 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76405232020-11-10 MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument Kasper, Jürgen Lühnen, Julia Hinneburg, Jana Siebenhofer, Andrea Posch, Nicole Berger-Höger, Birte Grafe, Alexander Keppler, Jan Steckelberg, A BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using ‘think aloud’ in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: AsPredected22546; date of registration: 24 July 2019. PROTOCOL VERSION: July 2020. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640523/ /pubmed/33148762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Kasper, Jürgen
Lühnen, Julia
Hinneburg, Jana
Siebenhofer, Andrea
Posch, Nicole
Berger-Höger, Birte
Grafe, Alexander
Keppler, Jan
Steckelberg, A
MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument
title MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument
title_full MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument
title_fullStr MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument
title_full_unstemmed MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument
title_short MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument
title_sort mappinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
work_keys_str_mv AT kasperjurgen mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT luhnenjulia mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT hinneburgjana mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT siebenhoferandrea mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT poschnicole mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT bergerhogerbirte mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT grafealexander mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT kepplerjan mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument
AT steckelberga mappinfomappingqualityofhealthinformationstudyprotocolforavalidationstudyofanassessmentinstrument