Cargando…
Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: This protocol outlines a diagnostic individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aimed at developing simple prediction models based on readily available signs, symptoms and blood tests to accurately predict acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed (fluid level or total opacificat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040988 |
_version_ | 1783605763711696896 |
---|---|
author | Venekamp, Roderick Hansen, Jens Georg Reitsma, Johannes B Ebell, Mark H Lindbaek, Morten |
author_facet | Venekamp, Roderick Hansen, Jens Georg Reitsma, Johannes B Ebell, Mark H Lindbaek, Morten |
author_sort | Venekamp, Roderick |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This protocol outlines a diagnostic individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aimed at developing simple prediction models based on readily available signs, symptoms and blood tests to accurately predict acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed (fluid level or total opacification in any sinus) acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) in adults presenting to primary care with clinically diagnosed ARS, target conditions associated with antibiotic benefit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic searches of PubMed and Embase of a review on the accuracy of signs and symptoms for diagnosing ARS in ambulatory care will be updated to April 2020 to identify relevant studies. Authors of eligible studies will be contacted and invited to provide IPD. Methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Candidate predictor selection will be based on knowledge from existing literature, clinical reasoning and availability. Multivariable logistic regression analyses will be used to develop prediction models aimed at calculating absolute risk estimates. Large unexplained between-study heterogeneity in predictive accuracy of the models will be explored and may lead to either model adjustment or derivation of separate context-specific models. Calibration and discrimination will be evaluated to assess the models’ performance. Bootstrap resampling techniques will be used to assess internal validation and to inform on possible adjustment for overfitting. In addition, we aim to perform internal–external cross-validation procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In this IPD meta-analysis, no identifiable patient data will be used. As such, the Medical Research Involving Humans Subject Act does not apply, and official ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020175659. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7640527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76405272020-11-10 Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis Venekamp, Roderick Hansen, Jens Georg Reitsma, Johannes B Ebell, Mark H Lindbaek, Morten BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: This protocol outlines a diagnostic individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aimed at developing simple prediction models based on readily available signs, symptoms and blood tests to accurately predict acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed (fluid level or total opacification in any sinus) acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) in adults presenting to primary care with clinically diagnosed ARS, target conditions associated with antibiotic benefit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic searches of PubMed and Embase of a review on the accuracy of signs and symptoms for diagnosing ARS in ambulatory care will be updated to April 2020 to identify relevant studies. Authors of eligible studies will be contacted and invited to provide IPD. Methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Candidate predictor selection will be based on knowledge from existing literature, clinical reasoning and availability. Multivariable logistic regression analyses will be used to develop prediction models aimed at calculating absolute risk estimates. Large unexplained between-study heterogeneity in predictive accuracy of the models will be explored and may lead to either model adjustment or derivation of separate context-specific models. Calibration and discrimination will be evaluated to assess the models’ performance. Bootstrap resampling techniques will be used to assess internal validation and to inform on possible adjustment for overfitting. In addition, we aim to perform internal–external cross-validation procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In this IPD meta-analysis, no identifiable patient data will be used. As such, the Medical Research Involving Humans Subject Act does not apply, and official ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020175659. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640527/ /pubmed/33148765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040988 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Venekamp, Roderick Hansen, Jens Georg Reitsma, Johannes B Ebell, Mark H Lindbaek, Morten Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis |
title | Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_full | Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_short | Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and ct-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT venekamproderick accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT hansenjensgeorg accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT reitsmajohannesb accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT ebellmarkh accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT lindbaekmorten accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis |