Cargando…

Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: This protocol outlines a diagnostic individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aimed at developing simple prediction models based on readily available signs, symptoms and blood tests to accurately predict acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed (fluid level or total opacificat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venekamp, Roderick, Hansen, Jens Georg, Reitsma, Johannes B, Ebell, Mark H, Lindbaek, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040988
_version_ 1783605763711696896
author Venekamp, Roderick
Hansen, Jens Georg
Reitsma, Johannes B
Ebell, Mark H
Lindbaek, Morten
author_facet Venekamp, Roderick
Hansen, Jens Georg
Reitsma, Johannes B
Ebell, Mark H
Lindbaek, Morten
author_sort Venekamp, Roderick
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This protocol outlines a diagnostic individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aimed at developing simple prediction models based on readily available signs, symptoms and blood tests to accurately predict acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed (fluid level or total opacification in any sinus) acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) in adults presenting to primary care with clinically diagnosed ARS, target conditions associated with antibiotic benefit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic searches of PubMed and Embase of a review on the accuracy of signs and symptoms for diagnosing ARS in ambulatory care will be updated to April 2020 to identify relevant studies. Authors of eligible studies will be contacted and invited to provide IPD. Methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Candidate predictor selection will be based on knowledge from existing literature, clinical reasoning and availability. Multivariable logistic regression analyses will be used to develop prediction models aimed at calculating absolute risk estimates. Large unexplained between-study heterogeneity in predictive accuracy of the models will be explored and may lead to either model adjustment or derivation of separate context-specific models. Calibration and discrimination will be evaluated to assess the models’ performance. Bootstrap resampling techniques will be used to assess internal validation and to inform on possible adjustment for overfitting. In addition, we aim to perform internal–external cross-validation procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In this IPD meta-analysis, no identifiable patient data will be used. As such, the Medical Research Involving Humans Subject Act does not apply, and official ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020175659.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76405272020-11-10 Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis Venekamp, Roderick Hansen, Jens Georg Reitsma, Johannes B Ebell, Mark H Lindbaek, Morten BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: This protocol outlines a diagnostic individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aimed at developing simple prediction models based on readily available signs, symptoms and blood tests to accurately predict acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed (fluid level or total opacification in any sinus) acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) in adults presenting to primary care with clinically diagnosed ARS, target conditions associated with antibiotic benefit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic searches of PubMed and Embase of a review on the accuracy of signs and symptoms for diagnosing ARS in ambulatory care will be updated to April 2020 to identify relevant studies. Authors of eligible studies will be contacted and invited to provide IPD. Methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Candidate predictor selection will be based on knowledge from existing literature, clinical reasoning and availability. Multivariable logistic regression analyses will be used to develop prediction models aimed at calculating absolute risk estimates. Large unexplained between-study heterogeneity in predictive accuracy of the models will be explored and may lead to either model adjustment or derivation of separate context-specific models. Calibration and discrimination will be evaluated to assess the models’ performance. Bootstrap resampling techniques will be used to assess internal validation and to inform on possible adjustment for overfitting. In addition, we aim to perform internal–external cross-validation procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In this IPD meta-analysis, no identifiable patient data will be used. As such, the Medical Research Involving Humans Subject Act does not apply, and official ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020175659. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640527/ /pubmed/33148765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040988 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Venekamp, Roderick
Hansen, Jens Georg
Reitsma, Johannes B
Ebell, Mark H
Lindbaek, Morten
Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
title Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and CT-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of signs, symptoms and blood tests for diagnosing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and ct-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis in adults: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040988
work_keys_str_mv AT venekamproderick accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT hansenjensgeorg accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT reitsmajohannesb accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT ebellmarkh accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT lindbaekmorten accuracyofsignssymptomsandbloodtestsfordiagnosingacutebacterialrhinosinusitisandctconfirmedacuterhinosinusitisinadultsprotocolofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis