Cargando…

Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines

OBJECTIVE: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinal toxicity is an ongoing concern for rheumatologists. The revised 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines created controversy regarding the correct dosing and evaluation of HCQ toxicity. The current study was initiated to further understand r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winebrake, James, Khalili, Leila, Weiner, Julia, Gartshteyn, Yevgeniya, Park, Lisa, Askanase, Anca D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000427
_version_ 1783605765421924352
author Winebrake, James
Khalili, Leila
Weiner, Julia
Gartshteyn, Yevgeniya
Park, Lisa
Askanase, Anca D
author_facet Winebrake, James
Khalili, Leila
Weiner, Julia
Gartshteyn, Yevgeniya
Park, Lisa
Askanase, Anca D
author_sort Winebrake, James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinal toxicity is an ongoing concern for rheumatologists. The revised 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines created controversy regarding the correct dosing and evaluation of HCQ toxicity. The current study was initiated to further understand rheumatologists’ practices regarding HCQ. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey was distributed electronically to rheumatologists. We collected information on HCQ dosing, clinical decision-making processes, familiarity with the AAO 2016 guidelines, and perceived disparities between the AAO 2016 guidelines and rheumatological clinical practice. RESULTS: 78 rheumatologists completed the survey (49% from USA, 90% academic practices, 82% self-identified as lupus experts). Only lupus expert (n=64) data were included in subsequent analysis. The mean cohort size was 747 (50–6571), a total cohort 45 612 patients. HCQ was prescribed to >75% of patients with SLE by 81.3% of SLE experts, with routine counselling about ophthalmic risks. The typical dose of HCQ used was 200–400 mg/day. 17% of rheumatologists use doses up to 600 mg/day, while 6.2% use up to 6.5 mg/kg/day. HCQ adherence is routinely assessed. 479 cases of HCQ retinal toxicity (1.05%) and 9 cases of HCQ-associated blindness (1.8 per 10 000 patients) were reported. 89.1% of respondents reported familiarity with the AAO guidelines. Those aware of the guidelines cited limited dosing options (54.7%), lack of supporting evidence (57.8%) and low patient adherence (43.8%) as obstacles to greater implementation of the guidelines. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that HCQ toxicity and blindness are rare in patients with SLE. Rheumatologists treating patients with SLE are aware of the guidelines and appreciate the importance of partnering with ophthalmologists in preventing retinal toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76405342020-11-10 Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines Winebrake, James Khalili, Leila Weiner, Julia Gartshteyn, Yevgeniya Park, Lisa Askanase, Anca D Lupus Sci Med Epidemiology and Outcomes OBJECTIVE: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinal toxicity is an ongoing concern for rheumatologists. The revised 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines created controversy regarding the correct dosing and evaluation of HCQ toxicity. The current study was initiated to further understand rheumatologists’ practices regarding HCQ. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey was distributed electronically to rheumatologists. We collected information on HCQ dosing, clinical decision-making processes, familiarity with the AAO 2016 guidelines, and perceived disparities between the AAO 2016 guidelines and rheumatological clinical practice. RESULTS: 78 rheumatologists completed the survey (49% from USA, 90% academic practices, 82% self-identified as lupus experts). Only lupus expert (n=64) data were included in subsequent analysis. The mean cohort size was 747 (50–6571), a total cohort 45 612 patients. HCQ was prescribed to >75% of patients with SLE by 81.3% of SLE experts, with routine counselling about ophthalmic risks. The typical dose of HCQ used was 200–400 mg/day. 17% of rheumatologists use doses up to 600 mg/day, while 6.2% use up to 6.5 mg/kg/day. HCQ adherence is routinely assessed. 479 cases of HCQ retinal toxicity (1.05%) and 9 cases of HCQ-associated blindness (1.8 per 10 000 patients) were reported. 89.1% of respondents reported familiarity with the AAO guidelines. Those aware of the guidelines cited limited dosing options (54.7%), lack of supporting evidence (57.8%) and low patient adherence (43.8%) as obstacles to greater implementation of the guidelines. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that HCQ toxicity and blindness are rare in patients with SLE. Rheumatologists treating patients with SLE are aware of the guidelines and appreciate the importance of partnering with ophthalmologists in preventing retinal toxicity. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640534/ /pubmed/33148665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000427 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology and Outcomes
Winebrake, James
Khalili, Leila
Weiner, Julia
Gartshteyn, Yevgeniya
Park, Lisa
Askanase, Anca D
Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines
title Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines
title_full Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines
title_fullStr Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines
title_short Rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines
title_sort rheumatologists’ perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines
topic Epidemiology and Outcomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000427
work_keys_str_mv AT winebrakejames rheumatologistsperspectiveonhydroxychloroquineguidelines
AT khalilileila rheumatologistsperspectiveonhydroxychloroquineguidelines
AT weinerjulia rheumatologistsperspectiveonhydroxychloroquineguidelines
AT gartshteynyevgeniya rheumatologistsperspectiveonhydroxychloroquineguidelines
AT parklisa rheumatologistsperspectiveonhydroxychloroquineguidelines
AT askanaseancad rheumatologistsperspectiveonhydroxychloroquineguidelines