Cargando…

The trans-septal approach in transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation for degenerative bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation (TMViVI) has recently emerged as a novel therapy for degenerated mitral valve bioprosthesis. Re-operative mitral valve surgery is associated with a substantial risk of mortality and morbidity. The objective of this study was to describe th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otaiby, Mohammed Al, Al Garni, Turki A., Alkhushail, Abdullah, Almoghairi, Abdulrahman, Samargandy, Sondos, Albabtain, Monirah, Algarni, Khaled D., Arafat, Amr A., Khairallah, Hatim, Alamri, Hussein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Heart Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33154908
http://dx.doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.323
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation (TMViVI) has recently emerged as a novel therapy for degenerated mitral valve bioprosthesis. Re-operative mitral valve surgery is associated with a substantial risk of mortality and morbidity. The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantations in our cardiac center. METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent the valve-in-valve procedure because of bioprosthesis degeneration from March 2017 to October 2018. Clinical, echocardiographic, procedural details and survival at follow up were assessed. RESULTS: Eight patients refused re-operative cardiac surgery while others were deemed a high risk for conventional re-operative sternotomy. All patients had TMViVI performed via a trans-septal approach, and the prosthesis was implanted successfully with immediate hemodynamic improvement in 20 patients. One patient had tamponade (4.55%), two had permanent pacemaker insertion (9.09%), two patients had a renal impairment (9.09%), and three patients had vascular complications (13.64%). There was one aborted procedure for the failure to cross the tissue valve with a transcatheter valve, and one patient was converted to an emergency mitral valve surgery. All patients were discharged in NYHA class I/II and NYHA class was markedly improved at one-year follow-up (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Trans-septal mitral valve-in-valve implantation can be performed safely for degenerative mitral valve bioprosthesis and with favorable early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes.