Cargando…
RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria may underestimate response to ICIs due to the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001499 |
_version_ | 1783605777680826368 |
---|---|
author | Cohen, Romain Bennouna, Jaafar Meurisse, Aurélia Tournigand, Christophe De La Fouchardière, Christelle Tougeron, David Borg, Christophe Mazard, Thibault Chibaudel, Benoist Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Svrcek, Magali Vernerey, Dewi Menu, Yves André, Thierry |
author_facet | Cohen, Romain Bennouna, Jaafar Meurisse, Aurélia Tournigand, Christophe De La Fouchardière, Christelle Tougeron, David Borg, Christophe Mazard, Thibault Chibaudel, Benoist Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Svrcek, Magali Vernerey, Dewi Menu, Yves André, Thierry |
author_sort | Cohen, Romain |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria may underestimate response to ICIs due to the pseudoprogression phenomenon. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pseudoprogressions in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. METHODS: Patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with/without targeted therapies received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. Computed tomography scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate at 12 weeks according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST by central review. RESULTS: Of 57 patients included between December 2017 and November 2018, 48.0% received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy, 18.0% had BRAF(V600E) mutation, and 56.0% had Lynch syndrome-related cancer. Seven patients (12.0%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events; one died due to a treatment-related adverse event. The disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks was 86.0% with RECIST 1.1% and 87.7% with iRECIST. Two pseudoprogressions (3.5%) were observed, at week 6 and at week 36, representing 18% of patients with disease progression per RECIST 1.1 criteria. With a median follow-up of 18.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.9% with RECIST 1.1% and 76.5% with iRECIST. The 12-month OS rate was 84%. Overall response rate was 59.7% with both criteria. RAS/BRAF status, sidedness, Lynch syndrome, and other baseline parameters were not associated with PFS. CONCLUSION: Pseudoprogression is rare in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. This combined ICI therapy confirms impressive DCR and survival outcomes in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03350126. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7640587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76405872020-11-10 RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study Cohen, Romain Bennouna, Jaafar Meurisse, Aurélia Tournigand, Christophe De La Fouchardière, Christelle Tougeron, David Borg, Christophe Mazard, Thibault Chibaudel, Benoist Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Svrcek, Magali Vernerey, Dewi Menu, Yves André, Thierry J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria may underestimate response to ICIs due to the pseudoprogression phenomenon. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pseudoprogressions in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. METHODS: Patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with/without targeted therapies received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. Computed tomography scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate at 12 weeks according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST by central review. RESULTS: Of 57 patients included between December 2017 and November 2018, 48.0% received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy, 18.0% had BRAF(V600E) mutation, and 56.0% had Lynch syndrome-related cancer. Seven patients (12.0%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events; one died due to a treatment-related adverse event. The disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks was 86.0% with RECIST 1.1% and 87.7% with iRECIST. Two pseudoprogressions (3.5%) were observed, at week 6 and at week 36, representing 18% of patients with disease progression per RECIST 1.1 criteria. With a median follow-up of 18.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.9% with RECIST 1.1% and 76.5% with iRECIST. The 12-month OS rate was 84%. Overall response rate was 59.7% with both criteria. RAS/BRAF status, sidedness, Lynch syndrome, and other baseline parameters were not associated with PFS. CONCLUSION: Pseudoprogression is rare in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. This combined ICI therapy confirms impressive DCR and survival outcomes in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03350126. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640587/ /pubmed/33148693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001499 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy Cohen, Romain Bennouna, Jaafar Meurisse, Aurélia Tournigand, Christophe De La Fouchardière, Christelle Tougeron, David Borg, Christophe Mazard, Thibault Chibaudel, Benoist Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Svrcek, Magali Vernerey, Dewi Menu, Yves André, Thierry RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study |
title | RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study |
title_full | RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study |
title_fullStr | RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study |
title_full_unstemmed | RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study |
title_short | RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study |
title_sort | recist and irecist criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the gercor nipicol phase ii study |
topic | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cohenromain recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT bennounajaafar recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT meurisseaurelia recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT tournigandchristophe recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT delafouchardierechristelle recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT tougerondavid recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT borgchristophe recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT mazardthibault recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT chibaudelbenoist recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT garcialarnicolmarieline recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT svrcekmagali recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT vernereydewi recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT menuyves recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy AT andrethierry recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy |