Cargando…

RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria may underestimate response to ICIs due to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Romain, Bennouna, Jaafar, Meurisse, Aurélia, Tournigand, Christophe, De La Fouchardière, Christelle, Tougeron, David, Borg, Christophe, Mazard, Thibault, Chibaudel, Benoist, Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line, Svrcek, Magali, Vernerey, Dewi, Menu, Yves, André, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001499
_version_ 1783605777680826368
author Cohen, Romain
Bennouna, Jaafar
Meurisse, Aurélia
Tournigand, Christophe
De La Fouchardière, Christelle
Tougeron, David
Borg, Christophe
Mazard, Thibault
Chibaudel, Benoist
Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line
Svrcek, Magali
Vernerey, Dewi
Menu, Yves
André, Thierry
author_facet Cohen, Romain
Bennouna, Jaafar
Meurisse, Aurélia
Tournigand, Christophe
De La Fouchardière, Christelle
Tougeron, David
Borg, Christophe
Mazard, Thibault
Chibaudel, Benoist
Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line
Svrcek, Magali
Vernerey, Dewi
Menu, Yves
André, Thierry
author_sort Cohen, Romain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria may underestimate response to ICIs due to the pseudoprogression phenomenon. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pseudoprogressions in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. METHODS: Patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with/without targeted therapies received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. Computed tomography scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate at 12 weeks according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST by central review. RESULTS: Of 57 patients included between December 2017 and November 2018, 48.0% received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy, 18.0% had BRAF(V600E) mutation, and 56.0% had Lynch syndrome-related cancer. Seven patients (12.0%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events; one died due to a treatment-related adverse event. The disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks was 86.0% with RECIST 1.1% and 87.7% with iRECIST. Two pseudoprogressions (3.5%) were observed, at week 6 and at week 36, representing 18% of patients with disease progression per RECIST 1.1 criteria. With a median follow-up of 18.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.9% with RECIST 1.1% and 76.5% with iRECIST. The 12-month OS rate was 84%. Overall response rate was 59.7% with both criteria. RAS/BRAF status, sidedness, Lynch syndrome, and other baseline parameters were not associated with PFS. CONCLUSION: Pseudoprogression is rare in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. This combined ICI therapy confirms impressive DCR and survival outcomes in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03350126.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76405872020-11-10 RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study Cohen, Romain Bennouna, Jaafar Meurisse, Aurélia Tournigand, Christophe De La Fouchardière, Christelle Tougeron, David Borg, Christophe Mazard, Thibault Chibaudel, Benoist Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Svrcek, Magali Vernerey, Dewi Menu, Yves André, Thierry J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria may underestimate response to ICIs due to the pseudoprogression phenomenon. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pseudoprogressions in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. METHODS: Patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan with/without targeted therapies received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. Computed tomography scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate at 12 weeks according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST by central review. RESULTS: Of 57 patients included between December 2017 and November 2018, 48.0% received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy, 18.0% had BRAF(V600E) mutation, and 56.0% had Lynch syndrome-related cancer. Seven patients (12.0%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events; one died due to a treatment-related adverse event. The disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks was 86.0% with RECIST 1.1% and 87.7% with iRECIST. Two pseudoprogressions (3.5%) were observed, at week 6 and at week 36, representing 18% of patients with disease progression per RECIST 1.1 criteria. With a median follow-up of 18.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.9% with RECIST 1.1% and 76.5% with iRECIST. The 12-month OS rate was 84%. Overall response rate was 59.7% with both criteria. RAS/BRAF status, sidedness, Lynch syndrome, and other baseline parameters were not associated with PFS. CONCLUSION: Pseudoprogression is rare in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. This combined ICI therapy confirms impressive DCR and survival outcomes in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03350126. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640587/ /pubmed/33148693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001499 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
Cohen, Romain
Bennouna, Jaafar
Meurisse, Aurélia
Tournigand, Christophe
De La Fouchardière, Christelle
Tougeron, David
Borg, Christophe
Mazard, Thibault
Chibaudel, Benoist
Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line
Svrcek, Magali
Vernerey, Dewi
Menu, Yves
André, Thierry
RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study
title RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study
title_full RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study
title_fullStr RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study
title_full_unstemmed RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study
title_short RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study
title_sort recist and irecist criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the gercor nipicol phase ii study
topic Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001499
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenromain recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT bennounajaafar recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT meurisseaurelia recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT tournigandchristophe recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT delafouchardierechristelle recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT tougerondavid recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT borgchristophe recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT mazardthibault recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT chibaudelbenoist recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT garcialarnicolmarieline recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT svrcekmagali recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT vernereydewi recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT menuyves recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy
AT andrethierry recistandirecistcriteriafortheevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmicrosatelliteinstabilityhighmismatchrepairdeficientmetastaticcolorectalcancerthegercornipicolphaseiistudy