Cargando…

Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study

BACKGROUND: Focus on frailty status has become increasingly important when determining care plans within and across health care sectors. A standardized frailty measure applicable for both primary and secondary health care sectors is needed to provide a common reference point. The aim of this study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nissen, Søren Kabell, Fournaise, Anders, Lauridsen, Jørgen T., Ryg, Jesper, Nickel, Christian H., Gudex, Claire, Brabrand, Mikkel, Andersen-Ranberg, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y
_version_ 1783605790395858944
author Nissen, Søren Kabell
Fournaise, Anders
Lauridsen, Jørgen T.
Ryg, Jesper
Nickel, Christian H.
Gudex, Claire
Brabrand, Mikkel
Andersen-Ranberg, Karen
author_facet Nissen, Søren Kabell
Fournaise, Anders
Lauridsen, Jørgen T.
Ryg, Jesper
Nickel, Christian H.
Gudex, Claire
Brabrand, Mikkel
Andersen-Ranberg, Karen
author_sort Nissen, Søren Kabell
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Focus on frailty status has become increasingly important when determining care plans within and across health care sectors. A standardized frailty measure applicable for both primary and secondary health care sectors is needed to provide a common reference point. The aim of this study was to translate the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) into Danish (CFS-DK) and test inter-rater reliability for key health care professionals in the primary and secondary sectors using the CFS-DK. METHODS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated into Danish using the ISPOR principles for translation and cultural adaptation that included forward and back translation, review by the original developer, and cognitive debriefing. For the validation exercise, 40 participants were asked to rate 15 clinical case vignettes using the CFS-DK. The raters were distributed across several health care professions: primary care physicians (n = 10), community nurses (n = 10), hospital doctors from internal medicine (n = 10) and intensive care (n = 10). Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and sensitivity analysis was performed using multilevel random effects linear regression. RESULTS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish and is presented in this paper in its final form. Inter-rater reliability in the four professional groups ranged from ICC 0.81 to 0.90. Sensitivity analysis showed no significant impact of professional group or length of clinical experience. The health care professionals considered the CFS-DK to be relevant for their own area of work and for cross-sectoral collaboration. CONCLUSION: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish. The inter-rater reliability was high in all four groups of health care professionals involved in cross-sectoral collaborations. However, the use of case vignettes may reduce the generalizability of the reliability findings to real-life settings. The CFS has the potential to serve as a common reference tool when treating and rehabilitating older patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76406482020-11-04 Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study Nissen, Søren Kabell Fournaise, Anders Lauridsen, Jørgen T. Ryg, Jesper Nickel, Christian H. Gudex, Claire Brabrand, Mikkel Andersen-Ranberg, Karen BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Focus on frailty status has become increasingly important when determining care plans within and across health care sectors. A standardized frailty measure applicable for both primary and secondary health care sectors is needed to provide a common reference point. The aim of this study was to translate the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) into Danish (CFS-DK) and test inter-rater reliability for key health care professionals in the primary and secondary sectors using the CFS-DK. METHODS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated into Danish using the ISPOR principles for translation and cultural adaptation that included forward and back translation, review by the original developer, and cognitive debriefing. For the validation exercise, 40 participants were asked to rate 15 clinical case vignettes using the CFS-DK. The raters were distributed across several health care professions: primary care physicians (n = 10), community nurses (n = 10), hospital doctors from internal medicine (n = 10) and intensive care (n = 10). Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and sensitivity analysis was performed using multilevel random effects linear regression. RESULTS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish and is presented in this paper in its final form. Inter-rater reliability in the four professional groups ranged from ICC 0.81 to 0.90. Sensitivity analysis showed no significant impact of professional group or length of clinical experience. The health care professionals considered the CFS-DK to be relevant for their own area of work and for cross-sectoral collaboration. CONCLUSION: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish. The inter-rater reliability was high in all four groups of health care professionals involved in cross-sectoral collaborations. However, the use of case vignettes may reduce the generalizability of the reliability findings to real-life settings. The CFS has the potential to serve as a common reference tool when treating and rehabilitating older patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y. BioMed Central 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640648/ /pubmed/33143651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nissen, Søren Kabell
Fournaise, Anders
Lauridsen, Jørgen T.
Ryg, Jesper
Nickel, Christian H.
Gudex, Claire
Brabrand, Mikkel
Andersen-Ranberg, Karen
Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study
title Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study
title_full Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study
title_fullStr Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study
title_short Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study
title_sort cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a danish translation and validation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nissensørenkabell crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy
AT fournaiseanders crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy
AT lauridsenjørgent crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy
AT rygjesper crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy
AT nickelchristianh crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy
AT gudexclaire crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy
AT brabrandmikkel crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy
AT andersenranbergkaren crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy