Cargando…
Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study
BACKGROUND: Focus on frailty status has become increasingly important when determining care plans within and across health care sectors. A standardized frailty measure applicable for both primary and secondary health care sectors is needed to provide a common reference point. The aim of this study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y |
_version_ | 1783605790395858944 |
---|---|
author | Nissen, Søren Kabell Fournaise, Anders Lauridsen, Jørgen T. Ryg, Jesper Nickel, Christian H. Gudex, Claire Brabrand, Mikkel Andersen-Ranberg, Karen |
author_facet | Nissen, Søren Kabell Fournaise, Anders Lauridsen, Jørgen T. Ryg, Jesper Nickel, Christian H. Gudex, Claire Brabrand, Mikkel Andersen-Ranberg, Karen |
author_sort | Nissen, Søren Kabell |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Focus on frailty status has become increasingly important when determining care plans within and across health care sectors. A standardized frailty measure applicable for both primary and secondary health care sectors is needed to provide a common reference point. The aim of this study was to translate the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) into Danish (CFS-DK) and test inter-rater reliability for key health care professionals in the primary and secondary sectors using the CFS-DK. METHODS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated into Danish using the ISPOR principles for translation and cultural adaptation that included forward and back translation, review by the original developer, and cognitive debriefing. For the validation exercise, 40 participants were asked to rate 15 clinical case vignettes using the CFS-DK. The raters were distributed across several health care professions: primary care physicians (n = 10), community nurses (n = 10), hospital doctors from internal medicine (n = 10) and intensive care (n = 10). Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and sensitivity analysis was performed using multilevel random effects linear regression. RESULTS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish and is presented in this paper in its final form. Inter-rater reliability in the four professional groups ranged from ICC 0.81 to 0.90. Sensitivity analysis showed no significant impact of professional group or length of clinical experience. The health care professionals considered the CFS-DK to be relevant for their own area of work and for cross-sectoral collaboration. CONCLUSION: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish. The inter-rater reliability was high in all four groups of health care professionals involved in cross-sectoral collaborations. However, the use of case vignettes may reduce the generalizability of the reliability findings to real-life settings. The CFS has the potential to serve as a common reference tool when treating and rehabilitating older patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7640648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76406482020-11-04 Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study Nissen, Søren Kabell Fournaise, Anders Lauridsen, Jørgen T. Ryg, Jesper Nickel, Christian H. Gudex, Claire Brabrand, Mikkel Andersen-Ranberg, Karen BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Focus on frailty status has become increasingly important when determining care plans within and across health care sectors. A standardized frailty measure applicable for both primary and secondary health care sectors is needed to provide a common reference point. The aim of this study was to translate the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) into Danish (CFS-DK) and test inter-rater reliability for key health care professionals in the primary and secondary sectors using the CFS-DK. METHODS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated into Danish using the ISPOR principles for translation and cultural adaptation that included forward and back translation, review by the original developer, and cognitive debriefing. For the validation exercise, 40 participants were asked to rate 15 clinical case vignettes using the CFS-DK. The raters were distributed across several health care professions: primary care physicians (n = 10), community nurses (n = 10), hospital doctors from internal medicine (n = 10) and intensive care (n = 10). Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and sensitivity analysis was performed using multilevel random effects linear regression. RESULTS: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish and is presented in this paper in its final form. Inter-rater reliability in the four professional groups ranged from ICC 0.81 to 0.90. Sensitivity analysis showed no significant impact of professional group or length of clinical experience. The health care professionals considered the CFS-DK to be relevant for their own area of work and for cross-sectoral collaboration. CONCLUSION: The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish. The inter-rater reliability was high in all four groups of health care professionals involved in cross-sectoral collaborations. However, the use of case vignettes may reduce the generalizability of the reliability findings to real-life settings. The CFS has the potential to serve as a common reference tool when treating and rehabilitating older patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y. BioMed Central 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7640648/ /pubmed/33143651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nissen, Søren Kabell Fournaise, Anders Lauridsen, Jørgen T. Ryg, Jesper Nickel, Christian H. Gudex, Claire Brabrand, Mikkel Andersen-Ranberg, Karen Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study |
title | Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study |
title_full | Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study |
title_fullStr | Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study |
title_short | Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study |
title_sort | cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a danish translation and validation study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01850-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nissensørenkabell crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy AT fournaiseanders crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy AT lauridsenjørgent crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy AT rygjesper crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy AT nickelchristianh crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy AT gudexclaire crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy AT brabrandmikkel crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy AT andersenranbergkaren crosssectoralinterraterreliabilityoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleadanishtranslationandvalidationstudy |