Cargando…

Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?

BACKGROUND: A key ethical question in genomics research relates to whether individual genetic research results should be disclosed to research participants and if so, which results are to be disclosed, by whom and when. Whilst this issue has received only scarce attention in African bioethics discou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ralefala, Dimpho, Kasule, Mary, Wonkam, Ambroise, Matshaba, Mogomotsi, de Vries, Jantina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00549-4
_version_ 1783605795574775808
author Ralefala, Dimpho
Kasule, Mary
Wonkam, Ambroise
Matshaba, Mogomotsi
de Vries, Jantina
author_facet Ralefala, Dimpho
Kasule, Mary
Wonkam, Ambroise
Matshaba, Mogomotsi
de Vries, Jantina
author_sort Ralefala, Dimpho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A key ethical question in genomics research relates to whether individual genetic research results should be disclosed to research participants and if so, which results are to be disclosed, by whom and when. Whilst this issue has received only scarce attention in African bioethics discourse, the extension of genomics research to the African continent has brought it into sharp focus. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we examined the views of adolescents, parents and caregivers participating in a paediatric and adolescent HIV-TB genomic study in Botswana on how solidarity and reciprocity obligations could guide decisions about feedback of individual genetic research results. Data were collected using deliberative focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Findings from 93 participants (44 adolescents and 49 parents and caregivers) demonstrated the importance of considering solidarity and reciprocity obligations in decisions about the return of individual genetic research results to participants. Participants viewed research participation as a mutual relationship and expressed that return of research results would be one way in which research participation could be reciprocated. They noted that when reciprocity obligations are respected, participants feel valued and not respecting reciprocity expectations could undermine participant trust and participation in future studies. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that expectations of solidarity and reciprocity could translate into an obligation to feedback selected individual genetic research results in African genomics research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76406702020-11-04 Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research? Ralefala, Dimpho Kasule, Mary Wonkam, Ambroise Matshaba, Mogomotsi de Vries, Jantina BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: A key ethical question in genomics research relates to whether individual genetic research results should be disclosed to research participants and if so, which results are to be disclosed, by whom and when. Whilst this issue has received only scarce attention in African bioethics discourse, the extension of genomics research to the African continent has brought it into sharp focus. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we examined the views of adolescents, parents and caregivers participating in a paediatric and adolescent HIV-TB genomic study in Botswana on how solidarity and reciprocity obligations could guide decisions about feedback of individual genetic research results. Data were collected using deliberative focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Findings from 93 participants (44 adolescents and 49 parents and caregivers) demonstrated the importance of considering solidarity and reciprocity obligations in decisions about the return of individual genetic research results to participants. Participants viewed research participation as a mutual relationship and expressed that return of research results would be one way in which research participation could be reciprocated. They noted that when reciprocity obligations are respected, participants feel valued and not respecting reciprocity expectations could undermine participant trust and participation in future studies. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that expectations of solidarity and reciprocity could translate into an obligation to feedback selected individual genetic research results in African genomics research. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7640670/ /pubmed/33148222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00549-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ralefala, Dimpho
Kasule, Mary
Wonkam, Ambroise
Matshaba, Mogomotsi
de Vries, Jantina
Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
title Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
title_full Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
title_fullStr Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
title_full_unstemmed Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
title_short Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
title_sort do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel african researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00549-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ralefaladimpho dosolidarityandreciprocityobligationscompelafricanresearcherstofeedbackindividualgeneticresultsingenomicsresearch
AT kasulemary dosolidarityandreciprocityobligationscompelafricanresearcherstofeedbackindividualgeneticresultsingenomicsresearch
AT wonkamambroise dosolidarityandreciprocityobligationscompelafricanresearcherstofeedbackindividualgeneticresultsingenomicsresearch
AT matshabamogomotsi dosolidarityandreciprocityobligationscompelafricanresearcherstofeedbackindividualgeneticresultsingenomicsresearch
AT devriesjantina dosolidarityandreciprocityobligationscompelafricanresearcherstofeedbackindividualgeneticresultsingenomicsresearch