Cargando…

Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study

INTRODUCTION: Numerous recent publications have explored Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) systems as rehabilitation tools to help subacute and chronic stroke patients recover upper extremity movement. Recent work has shown that BCI therapy can lead to better outcomes than conventional therapy. BCI co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc, Cho, Woosang, Ortner, Rupert, Murovec, Nensi, Von Oertzen, Tim, Kamada, Kyousuke, Allison, Brendan Z., Guger, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.591435
_version_ 1783605844869382144
author Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc
Cho, Woosang
Ortner, Rupert
Murovec, Nensi
Von Oertzen, Tim
Kamada, Kyousuke
Allison, Brendan Z.
Guger, Christoph
author_facet Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc
Cho, Woosang
Ortner, Rupert
Murovec, Nensi
Von Oertzen, Tim
Kamada, Kyousuke
Allison, Brendan Z.
Guger, Christoph
author_sort Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Numerous recent publications have explored Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) systems as rehabilitation tools to help subacute and chronic stroke patients recover upper extremity movement. Recent work has shown that BCI therapy can lead to better outcomes than conventional therapy. BCI combined with other techniques such as Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and Virtual Reality (VR) allows to the user restore the neurological function by inducing the neural plasticity through improved real-time detection of motor imagery (MI) as patients perform therapy tasks. METHODS: Fifty-one stroke patients with upper extremity hemiparesis were recruited for this study. All participants performed 25 sessions with the MI BCI and assessment visits to track the functional changes before and after the therapy. RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrated a significant increase in the motor function of the paretic arm assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), ΔFMA-UE = 4.68 points, P < 0.001, reduction of the spasticity in the wrist and fingers assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), ΔMAS-wrist = -0.72 points (SD = 0.83), P < 0.001, ΔMAS-fingers = -0.63 points (SD = 0.82), P < 0.001. Other significant improvements in the grasp ability were detected in the healthy hand. All these functional improvements achieved during the BCI therapy persisted 6 months after the therapy ended. Results also showed that patients with Motor Imagery accuracy (MI) above 80% increase 3.16 points more in the FMA than patients below this threshold (95% CI; [1.47–6.62], P = 0.003). The functional improvement was not related with the stroke severity or with the stroke stage. CONCLUSION: The BCI treatment used here was effective in promoting long lasting functional improvements in the upper extremity in stroke survivors with severe, moderate and mild impairment. This functional improvement can be explained by improved neuroplasticity in the central nervous system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7640937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76409372020-11-13 Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc Cho, Woosang Ortner, Rupert Murovec, Nensi Von Oertzen, Tim Kamada, Kyousuke Allison, Brendan Z. Guger, Christoph Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Numerous recent publications have explored Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) systems as rehabilitation tools to help subacute and chronic stroke patients recover upper extremity movement. Recent work has shown that BCI therapy can lead to better outcomes than conventional therapy. BCI combined with other techniques such as Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and Virtual Reality (VR) allows to the user restore the neurological function by inducing the neural plasticity through improved real-time detection of motor imagery (MI) as patients perform therapy tasks. METHODS: Fifty-one stroke patients with upper extremity hemiparesis were recruited for this study. All participants performed 25 sessions with the MI BCI and assessment visits to track the functional changes before and after the therapy. RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrated a significant increase in the motor function of the paretic arm assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), ΔFMA-UE = 4.68 points, P < 0.001, reduction of the spasticity in the wrist and fingers assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), ΔMAS-wrist = -0.72 points (SD = 0.83), P < 0.001, ΔMAS-fingers = -0.63 points (SD = 0.82), P < 0.001. Other significant improvements in the grasp ability were detected in the healthy hand. All these functional improvements achieved during the BCI therapy persisted 6 months after the therapy ended. Results also showed that patients with Motor Imagery accuracy (MI) above 80% increase 3.16 points more in the FMA than patients below this threshold (95% CI; [1.47–6.62], P = 0.003). The functional improvement was not related with the stroke severity or with the stroke stage. CONCLUSION: The BCI treatment used here was effective in promoting long lasting functional improvements in the upper extremity in stroke survivors with severe, moderate and mild impairment. This functional improvement can be explained by improved neuroplasticity in the central nervous system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7640937/ /pubmed/33192277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.591435 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sebastián-Romagosa, Cho, Ortner, Murovec, Von Oertzen, Kamada, Allison and Guger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc
Cho, Woosang
Ortner, Rupert
Murovec, Nensi
Von Oertzen, Tim
Kamada, Kyousuke
Allison, Brendan Z.
Guger, Christoph
Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study
title Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study
title_full Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study
title_short Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study
title_sort brain computer interface treatment for motor rehabilitation of upper extremity of stroke patients—a feasibility study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.591435
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianromagosamarc braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT chowoosang braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT ortnerrupert braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT murovecnensi braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT vonoertzentim braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT kamadakyousuke braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT allisonbrendanz braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT gugerchristoph braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy