Cargando…
Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study
INTRODUCTION: Numerous recent publications have explored Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) systems as rehabilitation tools to help subacute and chronic stroke patients recover upper extremity movement. Recent work has shown that BCI therapy can lead to better outcomes than conventional therapy. BCI co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.591435 |
_version_ | 1783605844869382144 |
---|---|
author | Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc Cho, Woosang Ortner, Rupert Murovec, Nensi Von Oertzen, Tim Kamada, Kyousuke Allison, Brendan Z. Guger, Christoph |
author_facet | Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc Cho, Woosang Ortner, Rupert Murovec, Nensi Von Oertzen, Tim Kamada, Kyousuke Allison, Brendan Z. Guger, Christoph |
author_sort | Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Numerous recent publications have explored Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) systems as rehabilitation tools to help subacute and chronic stroke patients recover upper extremity movement. Recent work has shown that BCI therapy can lead to better outcomes than conventional therapy. BCI combined with other techniques such as Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and Virtual Reality (VR) allows to the user restore the neurological function by inducing the neural plasticity through improved real-time detection of motor imagery (MI) as patients perform therapy tasks. METHODS: Fifty-one stroke patients with upper extremity hemiparesis were recruited for this study. All participants performed 25 sessions with the MI BCI and assessment visits to track the functional changes before and after the therapy. RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrated a significant increase in the motor function of the paretic arm assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), ΔFMA-UE = 4.68 points, P < 0.001, reduction of the spasticity in the wrist and fingers assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), ΔMAS-wrist = -0.72 points (SD = 0.83), P < 0.001, ΔMAS-fingers = -0.63 points (SD = 0.82), P < 0.001. Other significant improvements in the grasp ability were detected in the healthy hand. All these functional improvements achieved during the BCI therapy persisted 6 months after the therapy ended. Results also showed that patients with Motor Imagery accuracy (MI) above 80% increase 3.16 points more in the FMA than patients below this threshold (95% CI; [1.47–6.62], P = 0.003). The functional improvement was not related with the stroke severity or with the stroke stage. CONCLUSION: The BCI treatment used here was effective in promoting long lasting functional improvements in the upper extremity in stroke survivors with severe, moderate and mild impairment. This functional improvement can be explained by improved neuroplasticity in the central nervous system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7640937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76409372020-11-13 Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc Cho, Woosang Ortner, Rupert Murovec, Nensi Von Oertzen, Tim Kamada, Kyousuke Allison, Brendan Z. Guger, Christoph Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Numerous recent publications have explored Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) systems as rehabilitation tools to help subacute and chronic stroke patients recover upper extremity movement. Recent work has shown that BCI therapy can lead to better outcomes than conventional therapy. BCI combined with other techniques such as Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and Virtual Reality (VR) allows to the user restore the neurological function by inducing the neural plasticity through improved real-time detection of motor imagery (MI) as patients perform therapy tasks. METHODS: Fifty-one stroke patients with upper extremity hemiparesis were recruited for this study. All participants performed 25 sessions with the MI BCI and assessment visits to track the functional changes before and after the therapy. RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrated a significant increase in the motor function of the paretic arm assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), ΔFMA-UE = 4.68 points, P < 0.001, reduction of the spasticity in the wrist and fingers assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), ΔMAS-wrist = -0.72 points (SD = 0.83), P < 0.001, ΔMAS-fingers = -0.63 points (SD = 0.82), P < 0.001. Other significant improvements in the grasp ability were detected in the healthy hand. All these functional improvements achieved during the BCI therapy persisted 6 months after the therapy ended. Results also showed that patients with Motor Imagery accuracy (MI) above 80% increase 3.16 points more in the FMA than patients below this threshold (95% CI; [1.47–6.62], P = 0.003). The functional improvement was not related with the stroke severity or with the stroke stage. CONCLUSION: The BCI treatment used here was effective in promoting long lasting functional improvements in the upper extremity in stroke survivors with severe, moderate and mild impairment. This functional improvement can be explained by improved neuroplasticity in the central nervous system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7640937/ /pubmed/33192277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.591435 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sebastián-Romagosa, Cho, Ortner, Murovec, Von Oertzen, Kamada, Allison and Guger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Sebastián-Romagosa, Marc Cho, Woosang Ortner, Rupert Murovec, Nensi Von Oertzen, Tim Kamada, Kyousuke Allison, Brendan Z. Guger, Christoph Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study |
title | Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study |
title_full | Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study |
title_fullStr | Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study |
title_short | Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients—A Feasibility Study |
title_sort | brain computer interface treatment for motor rehabilitation of upper extremity of stroke patients—a feasibility study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.591435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sebastianromagosamarc braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT chowoosang braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT ortnerrupert braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT murovecnensi braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT vonoertzentim braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT kamadakyousuke braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT allisonbrendanz braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT gugerchristoph braincomputerinterfacetreatmentformotorrehabilitationofupperextremityofstrokepatientsafeasibilitystudy |