Cargando…

Fear of COVID-19 Scale for Hospital Staff in Regional Hospitals in Mexico: a Brief Report

The presence of COVID-19 has had psychological consequences among health personnel; these include fear, anxiety, and depression. In the current study, we used the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) to assess the response to fear within health staff in Mexico. This was a cross-sectional survey study in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Reyna, Benjamín, Castillo-García, Gilberto Daniel, Barbosa-Camacho, Francisco José, Cervantes-Cardona, Guillermo Alonso, Cervantes-Pérez, Enrique, Torres-Mendoza, Blanca Miriam, Fuentes-Orozco, Clotilde, Pintor-Belmontes, Kevin Josue, Guzmán-Ramírez, Bertha Georgina, Bernal-Hernández, Aldo, González-Ojeda, Alejandro, Cervantes-Guevara, Gabino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7640993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00413-x
Descripción
Sumario:The presence of COVID-19 has had psychological consequences among health personnel; these include fear, anxiety, and depression. In the current study, we used the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) to assess the response to fear within health staff in Mexico. This was a cross-sectional survey study in which we administered the Spanish version of the FCV-19S to hospital staff. The FCV-19S is a seven-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of fear caused by COVID-19. A total of 2860 participants—1641 female and 1218 male personnel from three hospitals—were included in the study. The internal reliability of the scale was good, with Cronbach’s alpha of .902. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the seven items of the FCV-19S, showing good model fit (χ(2) (7) = 29.40, p < .001; CFI = .99; TLI = .99; RMSEA = .03; SRMR = .010; AIC = 71.40). We found a global FCV-19S mean score of 19.3 ± 6.9, with a significant difference in scores between women and men. Our survey shows a significantly higher level of fear in nursing and administrative personnel, which may be explained by the nursing staff being in close contact with infected patients and the administrative staff lacking understanding of the possible implications of the infection, compared with nonclinical hospital personnel. Our results are consistent with those of other researchers. We must remember that fear is a reaction and that we must be courageous enough to trust validated infection prevention practices to provide the highest standard of care, in the safest environment that we can, for as long as we can.