Cargando…
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains uncle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7641812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01779-2 |
_version_ | 1783606001695457280 |
---|---|
author | Ueda, Yoshitake Shiraishi, Norio Kawasaki, Takahide Akagi, Tomonori Ninomiya, Shigeo Shiroshita, Hidefumi Etoh, Tsuyoshi Inomata, Masafumi |
author_facet | Ueda, Yoshitake Shiraishi, Norio Kawasaki, Takahide Akagi, Tomonori Ninomiya, Shigeo Shiroshita, Hidefumi Etoh, Tsuyoshi Inomata, Masafumi |
author_sort | Ueda, Yoshitake |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains unclear. This study aimed to verify safety and curability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients ≥80 years old. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2014 were enrolled and classified into the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years (LAC-E) group, open surgery in elderly patients (OC-E) group, and laparoscopic surgery in non-elderly patients (LAC-NE) group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. RESULTS: The LAC-E, OC-E, and LAC-NE groups comprised 85, 25, and 358 patients, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LAC-E versus OC-E group (97 vs. 440 mL, p < .01 and 14% vs. 32%, p < .05, respectively). Long-term outcomes were not different between these two groups. Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAC-E versus LAC-NE group (249 vs. 288 min, p < .01). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Although the 5-year overall survival rate in the LAC-E group was lower than that in the LAC-NE group (64% vs. 80%, p < .01), there was no difference in 5-year disease-specific survival between the groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically and oncologically safe for colorectal cancer in the elderly as well as the non-elderly and can be an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7641812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76418122020-11-05 Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study Ueda, Yoshitake Shiraishi, Norio Kawasaki, Takahide Akagi, Tomonori Ninomiya, Shigeo Shiroshita, Hidefumi Etoh, Tsuyoshi Inomata, Masafumi BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains unclear. This study aimed to verify safety and curability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients ≥80 years old. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2014 were enrolled and classified into the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years (LAC-E) group, open surgery in elderly patients (OC-E) group, and laparoscopic surgery in non-elderly patients (LAC-NE) group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. RESULTS: The LAC-E, OC-E, and LAC-NE groups comprised 85, 25, and 358 patients, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LAC-E versus OC-E group (97 vs. 440 mL, p < .01 and 14% vs. 32%, p < .05, respectively). Long-term outcomes were not different between these two groups. Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAC-E versus LAC-NE group (249 vs. 288 min, p < .01). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Although the 5-year overall survival rate in the LAC-E group was lower than that in the LAC-NE group (64% vs. 80%, p < .01), there was no difference in 5-year disease-specific survival between the groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically and oncologically safe for colorectal cancer in the elderly as well as the non-elderly and can be an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7641812/ /pubmed/33148215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01779-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ueda, Yoshitake Shiraishi, Norio Kawasaki, Takahide Akagi, Tomonori Ninomiya, Shigeo Shiroshita, Hidefumi Etoh, Tsuyoshi Inomata, Masafumi Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7641812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01779-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uedayoshitake shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shiraishinorio shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT kawasakitakahide shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT akagitomonori shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT ninomiyashigeo shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shiroshitahidefumi shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT etohtsuyoshi shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy AT inomatamasafumi shortandlongtermoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerintheelderlyagedover80yearsoldversusnonelderlyaretrospectivecohortstudy |