Cargando…
Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study
PURPOSE: Implant location is performed after placement to verify that the safety of neighboring anatomic structure and the realizability of prosthetic plan. Routine postoperative location is based on radiological scanning and raises the concerns on radiation exposure and inconveniency in practice. I...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7641834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01297-y |
_version_ | 1783606006285074432 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Miao Zhou, Hui Li, Shu-yi Geng, Yuan-ming |
author_facet | Zhou, Miao Zhou, Hui Li, Shu-yi Geng, Yuan-ming |
author_sort | Zhou, Miao |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Implant location is performed after placement to verify that the safety of neighboring anatomic structure and the realizability of prosthetic plan. Routine postoperative location is based on radiological scanning and raises the concerns on radiation exposure and inconveniency in practice. In the present study a location method based on surface scanning was introduced and the accuracy of this method was assessed in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 40 implants were placed in 10 resin mandible models. The models were scanned with intraoral scanner (IS group) and extraoral scanner (ES group). The implant position was located with fusing the images of surface scanning and cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) after implant placement. Deviations were measured between positions located by surface scanner and postoperative CBCT with the parameters: central deviation at apex (cda), central deviation at hex (cdh), horizontal deviation at apex (hda), horizontal deviation at hex (hdh), vertical deviation at apex (vda), vertical deviation at hex (vdh) and angular deviation (ad). RESULTS: In IS group, the mean value of cda, cdh, hda, hdh, vda, vdh and ad was 0.27 mm, 0.23 mm, 0.12 mm, 0.10 mm, 0.21 mm, 0.19 mm and 0.72°, respectively. In ES group, the mean value of cda, cdh, hda, hdh, vda, vdh and ad was 0.28 mm, 0.25 mm 0.14 mm, 0.11 mm, 0.22 mm, 0.20 mm and 0.68°, respectively. The implant deviations in IS and ES groups were of no significant difference for any of the measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Dental implant can be located via surface scanner with acceptable accuracy for postoperative verification. Further clinical investigation is needed to assess the feasibility of the method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7641834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76418342020-11-05 Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study Zhou, Miao Zhou, Hui Li, Shu-yi Geng, Yuan-ming BMC Oral Health Research Article PURPOSE: Implant location is performed after placement to verify that the safety of neighboring anatomic structure and the realizability of prosthetic plan. Routine postoperative location is based on radiological scanning and raises the concerns on radiation exposure and inconveniency in practice. In the present study a location method based on surface scanning was introduced and the accuracy of this method was assessed in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 40 implants were placed in 10 resin mandible models. The models were scanned with intraoral scanner (IS group) and extraoral scanner (ES group). The implant position was located with fusing the images of surface scanning and cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) after implant placement. Deviations were measured between positions located by surface scanner and postoperative CBCT with the parameters: central deviation at apex (cda), central deviation at hex (cdh), horizontal deviation at apex (hda), horizontal deviation at hex (hdh), vertical deviation at apex (vda), vertical deviation at hex (vdh) and angular deviation (ad). RESULTS: In IS group, the mean value of cda, cdh, hda, hdh, vda, vdh and ad was 0.27 mm, 0.23 mm, 0.12 mm, 0.10 mm, 0.21 mm, 0.19 mm and 0.72°, respectively. In ES group, the mean value of cda, cdh, hda, hdh, vda, vdh and ad was 0.28 mm, 0.25 mm 0.14 mm, 0.11 mm, 0.22 mm, 0.20 mm and 0.68°, respectively. The implant deviations in IS and ES groups were of no significant difference for any of the measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Dental implant can be located via surface scanner with acceptable accuracy for postoperative verification. Further clinical investigation is needed to assess the feasibility of the method. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7641834/ /pubmed/33148240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01297-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhou, Miao Zhou, Hui Li, Shu-yi Geng, Yuan-ming Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study |
title | Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study |
title_full | Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study |
title_short | Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study |
title_sort | dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7641834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01297-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoumiao dentalimplantlocationviasurfacescannerapilotstudy AT zhouhui dentalimplantlocationviasurfacescannerapilotstudy AT lishuyi dentalimplantlocationviasurfacescannerapilotstudy AT gengyuanming dentalimplantlocationviasurfacescannerapilotstudy |