Cargando…

Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes

Lighting is typically static for indoor production of leafy greens. However, temporal spectrum differentiation for distinct growth phases can potentially control age-specific desirable traits. Spectral effects can be persistent yet dynamic as plants mature, necessitating characterization of time-dep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Qingwu, Runkle, Erik S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7641902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.571788
_version_ 1783606019909222400
author Meng, Qingwu
Runkle, Erik S.
author_facet Meng, Qingwu
Runkle, Erik S.
author_sort Meng, Qingwu
collection PubMed
description Lighting is typically static for indoor production of leafy greens. However, temporal spectrum differentiation for distinct growth phases can potentially control age-specific desirable traits. Spectral effects can be persistent yet dynamic as plants mature, necessitating characterization of time-dependent responses. We grew red-leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) “Rouxai” in a growth room at 23°C and under a 20-h photoperiod created by warm-white (WW), blue (B; peak = 449 nm), green (G; peak = 526 nm), red (R; peak = 664 nm), and/or far-red (FR; peak = 733 nm) light-emitting diodes. From day 0 to 11, plants received six static lighting treatments with the same total photon flux density (400–800 nm): WW(180), R(180), B(20)R(160), B(20)G(60)R(100), B(20)R(100)FR(60), or B(180) (subscripts denote photon flux densities in μmol⋅m(–2)⋅s(–1)). On day 11, plants grown under each of the six treatments were transferred to all treatments, which created 36 temporal spectrum alternations. Plant growth, morphology, and coloration were measured on days 11 and 25. Increasing B radiation from 0 to 100% in static treatments decreased shoot fresh and dry weights and increased foliage redness of seedlings and mature plants. Compared to B(20)R(160), B(20)R(100)FR(60) increased shoot fresh weight, but not dry weight, on both days. However, other phenotypic responses under static treatments changed over time. For example, leaf length under B(180) was 35% lower on day 11 but similar on day 25 compared to that under R(180). In the B(20) background, substituting G(60) for R radiation did not influence shoot weight on day 11 but decreased it by 19% on day 25. When plants were switched from one treatment to another on day 11, the treatments applied before day 11 influenced final shoot weight and, to a lesser extent, leaf length and foliage coloration on day 25. In comparison, effects of the treatments applied after day 11 were more pronounced. We conclude some phenotypic responses to light quality depend on time and sequential light quality treatments had cumulative effects on lettuce growth. The temporal complexity of spectral responses is critical in photobiological research and creates opportunities for time-specific spectrum delivery to optimize crop characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7641902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76419022020-11-13 Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes Meng, Qingwu Runkle, Erik S. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Lighting is typically static for indoor production of leafy greens. However, temporal spectrum differentiation for distinct growth phases can potentially control age-specific desirable traits. Spectral effects can be persistent yet dynamic as plants mature, necessitating characterization of time-dependent responses. We grew red-leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) “Rouxai” in a growth room at 23°C and under a 20-h photoperiod created by warm-white (WW), blue (B; peak = 449 nm), green (G; peak = 526 nm), red (R; peak = 664 nm), and/or far-red (FR; peak = 733 nm) light-emitting diodes. From day 0 to 11, plants received six static lighting treatments with the same total photon flux density (400–800 nm): WW(180), R(180), B(20)R(160), B(20)G(60)R(100), B(20)R(100)FR(60), or B(180) (subscripts denote photon flux densities in μmol⋅m(–2)⋅s(–1)). On day 11, plants grown under each of the six treatments were transferred to all treatments, which created 36 temporal spectrum alternations. Plant growth, morphology, and coloration were measured on days 11 and 25. Increasing B radiation from 0 to 100% in static treatments decreased shoot fresh and dry weights and increased foliage redness of seedlings and mature plants. Compared to B(20)R(160), B(20)R(100)FR(60) increased shoot fresh weight, but not dry weight, on both days. However, other phenotypic responses under static treatments changed over time. For example, leaf length under B(180) was 35% lower on day 11 but similar on day 25 compared to that under R(180). In the B(20) background, substituting G(60) for R radiation did not influence shoot weight on day 11 but decreased it by 19% on day 25. When plants were switched from one treatment to another on day 11, the treatments applied before day 11 influenced final shoot weight and, to a lesser extent, leaf length and foliage coloration on day 25. In comparison, effects of the treatments applied after day 11 were more pronounced. We conclude some phenotypic responses to light quality depend on time and sequential light quality treatments had cumulative effects on lettuce growth. The temporal complexity of spectral responses is critical in photobiological research and creates opportunities for time-specific spectrum delivery to optimize crop characteristics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7641902/ /pubmed/33193506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.571788 Text en Copyright © 2020 Meng and Runkle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Meng, Qingwu
Runkle, Erik S.
Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes
title Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes
title_full Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes
title_fullStr Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes
title_full_unstemmed Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes
title_short Growth Responses of Red-Leaf Lettuce to Temporal Spectral Changes
title_sort growth responses of red-leaf lettuce to temporal spectral changes
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7641902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.571788
work_keys_str_mv AT mengqingwu growthresponsesofredleaflettucetotemporalspectralchanges
AT runkleeriks growthresponsesofredleaflettucetotemporalspectralchanges