Cargando…

High-quality brain perfusion SPECT images may be achieved with a high-speed recording using 360° CZT camera

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare brain perfusion SPECT obtained from a 360° CZT and a conventional Anger camera. METHODS: The 360° CZT camera utilizing a brain configuration, with 12 detectors surrounding the head, was compared to a 2-head Anger camera for count sensitivity and image...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bordonne, Manon, Chawki, Mohammad B., Marie, Pierre-Yves, Zaragori, Timothée, Roch, Véronique, Grignon, Rachel, Imbert, Laetitia, Verger, Antoine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00334-7
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare brain perfusion SPECT obtained from a 360° CZT and a conventional Anger camera. METHODS: The 360° CZT camera utilizing a brain configuration, with 12 detectors surrounding the head, was compared to a 2-head Anger camera for count sensitivity and image quality on 30-min SPECT recordings from a brain phantom and from (99m)Tc-HMPAO brain perfusion in 2 groups of 21 patients investigated with the CZT and Anger cameras, respectively. Image reconstruction was adjusted according to image contrast for each camera. RESULTS: The CZT camera provided more than 2-fold increase in count sensitivity, as compared with the Anger camera, as well as (1) lower sharpness indexes, giving evidence of higher spatial resolution, for both peripheral/central brain structures, with respective median values of 5.2%/3.7% versus 2.4%/1.9% for CZT and Anger camera respectively in patients (p < 0.01), and 8.0%/6.9% versus 6.2%/3.7% on phantom; and (2) higher gray/white matter contrast on peripheral/central structures, with respective ratio median values of 1.56/1.35 versus 1.11/1.20 for CZT and Anger camera respectively in patients (p < 0.05), and 2.57/2.17 versus 1.40/1.12 on phantom; and (3) no change in noise level. Image quality, scored visually by experienced physicians, was also significantly higher on CZT than on the Anger camera (+ 80%, p < 0.01), and all these results were unchanged on the CZT images obtained with only a 15 min recording time. CONCLUSION: The 360° CZT camera provides brain perfusion images of much higher quality than a conventional Anger camera, even with high-speed recordings, thus demonstrating the potential for repositioning brain perfusion SPECT to the forefront of brain imaging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-020-00334-7.