Cargando…

Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance

This study aimed to propose a conditioning activity (CA) model to stimulate improvement on neuromuscular responses, mechanical parameters and for the 50-m freestyle swimming. Thirteen male swimmers (19 ± 3 years and performances of 77% in relation to World Championship records) performed four CA pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Arruda, Tarine Botta, Barbieri, Ricardo Augusto, de Andrade, Vitor Luiz, Cursiol, Jônatas Augusto, Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto, Bertucci, Danilo Rodrigues, Papoti, Marcelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192588
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.580711
_version_ 1783606046065950720
author de Arruda, Tarine Botta
Barbieri, Ricardo Augusto
de Andrade, Vitor Luiz
Cursiol, Jônatas Augusto
Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto
Bertucci, Danilo Rodrigues
Papoti, Marcelo
author_facet de Arruda, Tarine Botta
Barbieri, Ricardo Augusto
de Andrade, Vitor Luiz
Cursiol, Jônatas Augusto
Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto
Bertucci, Danilo Rodrigues
Papoti, Marcelo
author_sort de Arruda, Tarine Botta
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to propose a conditioning activity (CA) model to stimulate improvement on neuromuscular responses, mechanical parameters and for the 50-m freestyle swimming. Thirteen male swimmers (19 ± 3 years and performances of 77% in relation to World Championship records) performed four CA protocols followed by a maximum performance in the 50-m freestyle. In the first protocol (P1) swimmers performed a standard warm-up (∼15 min); in the second protocol (P2) lunges (3 × 85% of the one-repetition maximum); in the third (P3) pull-ups (3 maximum repetitions) and box jumps 40 cm high and 60 cm deep (1 × 5 with 10% of the corporal weight); and in the fourth protocol (P4) a combination of exercises from the second and third protocols. CA protocols had no effect on the standard warm-up. However, P2 performance (27.01 ± 1.25 s) was similar to P1 (27.01 ± 1.18 s) and presented higher positive effects in mechanical parameters for the swim start performance in comparison to other protocols, contributing to improvements in the 50-m freestyle. In addition, turnaround time also had a negative effect, mainly in P3 (3.12 ± 0.28 s), signaling the improvement of this variable in all protocols (P1: 3.30 ± 0.38 s; P2: 3.17 ± 0.30 s; P4: 3.17 ± 0.34 s). P2 (after: 80 ± 11%; before: 82.7 ± 9.9%) and P3 (after: 82.7 ± 9.9%; before: 85.1 ± 9.7%) presented a possible positive effect on the percentage of voluntary activation in relation to P1 (after: 79.3 ± 10.7%; before: 76.3 ± 12%). In conclusion, the proposed conditioning activity protocols were not efficient for performance improvement in the 50-m freestyle compared to the standard model and seem to specifically influence each phase of the event.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7642208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76422082020-11-13 Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance de Arruda, Tarine Botta Barbieri, Ricardo Augusto de Andrade, Vitor Luiz Cursiol, Jônatas Augusto Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto Bertucci, Danilo Rodrigues Papoti, Marcelo Front Physiol Physiology This study aimed to propose a conditioning activity (CA) model to stimulate improvement on neuromuscular responses, mechanical parameters and for the 50-m freestyle swimming. Thirteen male swimmers (19 ± 3 years and performances of 77% in relation to World Championship records) performed four CA protocols followed by a maximum performance in the 50-m freestyle. In the first protocol (P1) swimmers performed a standard warm-up (∼15 min); in the second protocol (P2) lunges (3 × 85% of the one-repetition maximum); in the third (P3) pull-ups (3 maximum repetitions) and box jumps 40 cm high and 60 cm deep (1 × 5 with 10% of the corporal weight); and in the fourth protocol (P4) a combination of exercises from the second and third protocols. CA protocols had no effect on the standard warm-up. However, P2 performance (27.01 ± 1.25 s) was similar to P1 (27.01 ± 1.18 s) and presented higher positive effects in mechanical parameters for the swim start performance in comparison to other protocols, contributing to improvements in the 50-m freestyle. In addition, turnaround time also had a negative effect, mainly in P3 (3.12 ± 0.28 s), signaling the improvement of this variable in all protocols (P1: 3.30 ± 0.38 s; P2: 3.17 ± 0.30 s; P4: 3.17 ± 0.34 s). P2 (after: 80 ± 11%; before: 82.7 ± 9.9%) and P3 (after: 82.7 ± 9.9%; before: 85.1 ± 9.7%) presented a possible positive effect on the percentage of voluntary activation in relation to P1 (after: 79.3 ± 10.7%; before: 76.3 ± 12%). In conclusion, the proposed conditioning activity protocols were not efficient for performance improvement in the 50-m freestyle compared to the standard model and seem to specifically influence each phase of the event. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7642208/ /pubmed/33192588 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.580711 Text en Copyright © 2020 de Arruda, Barbieri, de Andrade, Cursiol, Kalva-Filho, Bertucci and Papoti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
de Arruda, Tarine Botta
Barbieri, Ricardo Augusto
de Andrade, Vitor Luiz
Cursiol, Jônatas Augusto
Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto
Bertucci, Danilo Rodrigues
Papoti, Marcelo
Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance
title Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance
title_full Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance
title_fullStr Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance
title_full_unstemmed Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance
title_short Proposal of a Conditioning Activity Model on Sprint Swimming Performance
title_sort proposal of a conditioning activity model on sprint swimming performance
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192588
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.580711
work_keys_str_mv AT dearrudatarinebotta proposalofaconditioningactivitymodelonsprintswimmingperformance
AT barbieriricardoaugusto proposalofaconditioningactivitymodelonsprintswimmingperformance
AT deandradevitorluiz proposalofaconditioningactivitymodelonsprintswimmingperformance
AT cursioljonatasaugusto proposalofaconditioningactivitymodelonsprintswimmingperformance
AT kalvafilhocarlosaugusto proposalofaconditioningactivitymodelonsprintswimmingperformance
AT bertuccidanilorodrigues proposalofaconditioningactivitymodelonsprintswimmingperformance
AT papotimarcelo proposalofaconditioningactivitymodelonsprintswimmingperformance