Cargando…

Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments

In addition to inhabiting extreme territories, Archaea are widely distributed in common environments spanning from terrestrial to aquatic environments. This study investigated and compared archaeal community structures from three different habitats (representing distinct environments): agriculture s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hualong, Bier, Raven, Zgleszewski, Laura, Peipoch, Marc, Omondi, Emmanuel, Mukherjee, Atanu, Chen, Feng, Zhang, Chuanlun, Kan, Jinjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.576661
_version_ 1783606103783768064
author Wang, Hualong
Bier, Raven
Zgleszewski, Laura
Peipoch, Marc
Omondi, Emmanuel
Mukherjee, Atanu
Chen, Feng
Zhang, Chuanlun
Kan, Jinjun
author_facet Wang, Hualong
Bier, Raven
Zgleszewski, Laura
Peipoch, Marc
Omondi, Emmanuel
Mukherjee, Atanu
Chen, Feng
Zhang, Chuanlun
Kan, Jinjun
author_sort Wang, Hualong
collection PubMed
description In addition to inhabiting extreme territories, Archaea are widely distributed in common environments spanning from terrestrial to aquatic environments. This study investigated and compared archaeal community structures from three different habitats (representing distinct environments): agriculture soils (from farming system trials FST, PA, United States), freshwater biofilms (from White Clay Creek, PA, United States), and estuary water (Chesapeake Bay, United States). High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes indicated that Thaumarchaeota, Euryarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, and Diapherotrites were the commonly found dominant phyla across these three environments. Similar to Bacteria, distinct community structure and distribution patterns for Archaea were observed in soils vs. freshwater vs. estuary. However, the abundance, richness, evenness, and diversity of archaeal communities were significantly greater in soils than it was in freshwater and estuarine environments. Indicator species (or amplicon sequence variants, ASVs) were identified from different nitrogen and carbon cycling archaeal groups in soils (Nitrososphaerales, Nitrosotaleales, Nitrosopumilales, Methanomassiliicoccales, Lainarchaeales), freshwater biofilms (Methanobacteria, Nitrososphaerales) and Chesapeake Bay (Marine Group II, Nitrosopumilales), suggesting the habitat-specificity of their biogeochemical contributions to different environments. Distinct functional aspects of Archaea were also confirmed by functional predictions (PICRUSt2 analysis). Further, co-occurrence network analysis indicated that only soil Archaea formed stable modules. Keystone species (ASVs) were identified mainly from Methanomassiliicoccales, Nitrososphaerales, Nitrosopumilales. Overall, these results indicate a strong habitat-dependent distribution of Archaea and their functional partitions within the local environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7642518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76425182020-11-13 Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments Wang, Hualong Bier, Raven Zgleszewski, Laura Peipoch, Marc Omondi, Emmanuel Mukherjee, Atanu Chen, Feng Zhang, Chuanlun Kan, Jinjun Front Microbiol Microbiology In addition to inhabiting extreme territories, Archaea are widely distributed in common environments spanning from terrestrial to aquatic environments. This study investigated and compared archaeal community structures from three different habitats (representing distinct environments): agriculture soils (from farming system trials FST, PA, United States), freshwater biofilms (from White Clay Creek, PA, United States), and estuary water (Chesapeake Bay, United States). High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes indicated that Thaumarchaeota, Euryarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, and Diapherotrites were the commonly found dominant phyla across these three environments. Similar to Bacteria, distinct community structure and distribution patterns for Archaea were observed in soils vs. freshwater vs. estuary. However, the abundance, richness, evenness, and diversity of archaeal communities were significantly greater in soils than it was in freshwater and estuarine environments. Indicator species (or amplicon sequence variants, ASVs) were identified from different nitrogen and carbon cycling archaeal groups in soils (Nitrososphaerales, Nitrosotaleales, Nitrosopumilales, Methanomassiliicoccales, Lainarchaeales), freshwater biofilms (Methanobacteria, Nitrososphaerales) and Chesapeake Bay (Marine Group II, Nitrosopumilales), suggesting the habitat-specificity of their biogeochemical contributions to different environments. Distinct functional aspects of Archaea were also confirmed by functional predictions (PICRUSt2 analysis). Further, co-occurrence network analysis indicated that only soil Archaea formed stable modules. Keystone species (ASVs) were identified mainly from Methanomassiliicoccales, Nitrososphaerales, Nitrosopumilales. Overall, these results indicate a strong habitat-dependent distribution of Archaea and their functional partitions within the local environments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7642518/ /pubmed/33193193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.576661 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wang, Bier, Zgleszewski, Peipoch, Omondi, Mukherjee, Chen, Zhang and Kan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Wang, Hualong
Bier, Raven
Zgleszewski, Laura
Peipoch, Marc
Omondi, Emmanuel
Mukherjee, Atanu
Chen, Feng
Zhang, Chuanlun
Kan, Jinjun
Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments
title Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments
title_full Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments
title_fullStr Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments
title_short Distinct Distribution of Archaea From Soil to Freshwater to Estuary: Implications of Archaeal Composition and Function in Different Environments
title_sort distinct distribution of archaea from soil to freshwater to estuary: implications of archaeal composition and function in different environments
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.576661
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghualong distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT bierraven distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT zgleszewskilaura distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT peipochmarc distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT omondiemmanuel distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT mukherjeeatanu distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT chenfeng distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT zhangchuanlun distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments
AT kanjinjun distinctdistributionofarchaeafromsoiltofreshwatertoestuaryimplicationsofarchaealcompositionandfunctionindifferentenvironments