Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden
BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a relatively rare and heterogenous group of tumors. Currently available treatment options for patients with progressive GEP-NETs include lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide ((177)Lu-Dotatate) and everolimus [as well as suniti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195647 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793 |
_version_ | 1783606105958514688 |
---|---|
author | Palmer, Jayne Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R |
author_facet | Palmer, Jayne Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R |
author_sort | Palmer, Jayne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a relatively rare and heterogenous group of tumors. Currently available treatment options for patients with progressive GEP-NETs include lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide ((177)Lu-Dotatate) and everolimus [as well as sunitinib for patients with pancreatic NETs (P-NETs)]. AIM: To perform a health economic analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic midgut-NETs or P-NETs in both Sweden and Norway. METHODS: Simulations were performed using a three-state partitioned survival model and analyses were performed separately for patients with midgut-NETs and P-NETs. Clinical input data were sourced from an indirect comparison that utilized survival data from clinical trials of (177)Lu-Dotatate and everolimus. The analyses were performed from the healthcare payer perspective over a time horizon of 20 years. For Sweden, future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. For Norway, a discount rate of 4% per annum was applied. RESULTS: For Sweden, improved survival outcomes and higher lifetime costs with (177)Lu-Dotatate resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SEK 391194 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for midgut NETs and SEK 16764 per QALY gained for P-NETs for (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus. For Norway, the corresponding ICERs were NOK 244444 per QALY gained and NOK 106451 per QALY gained, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were most sensitive to changes in drug acquisition costs and health state utility values. CONCLUSION: In both Sweden and Norway, from a healthcare provider perspective, (177)Lu-Dotatate is likely to be considered cost-effective relative to everolimus for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic, progressive midgut-NETs or P-NETs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7642527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76425272020-11-13 Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden Palmer, Jayne Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R World J Clin Cases Observational Study BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a relatively rare and heterogenous group of tumors. Currently available treatment options for patients with progressive GEP-NETs include lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide ((177)Lu-Dotatate) and everolimus [as well as sunitinib for patients with pancreatic NETs (P-NETs)]. AIM: To perform a health economic analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic midgut-NETs or P-NETs in both Sweden and Norway. METHODS: Simulations were performed using a three-state partitioned survival model and analyses were performed separately for patients with midgut-NETs and P-NETs. Clinical input data were sourced from an indirect comparison that utilized survival data from clinical trials of (177)Lu-Dotatate and everolimus. The analyses were performed from the healthcare payer perspective over a time horizon of 20 years. For Sweden, future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. For Norway, a discount rate of 4% per annum was applied. RESULTS: For Sweden, improved survival outcomes and higher lifetime costs with (177)Lu-Dotatate resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SEK 391194 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for midgut NETs and SEK 16764 per QALY gained for P-NETs for (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus. For Norway, the corresponding ICERs were NOK 244444 per QALY gained and NOK 106451 per QALY gained, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were most sensitive to changes in drug acquisition costs and health state utility values. CONCLUSION: In both Sweden and Norway, from a healthcare provider perspective, (177)Lu-Dotatate is likely to be considered cost-effective relative to everolimus for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic, progressive midgut-NETs or P-NETs. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-10-26 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7642527/ /pubmed/33195647 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Palmer, Jayne Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden |
title | Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in norway and sweden |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195647 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmerjayne costeffectivenessoflutetium177luoxodotreotidevseverolimusingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsinnorwayandsweden AT leeuwenkamposcarr costeffectivenessoflutetium177luoxodotreotidevseverolimusingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsinnorwayandsweden |