Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a relatively rare and heterogenous group of tumors. Currently available treatment options for patients with progressive GEP-NETs include lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide ((177)Lu-Dotatate) and everolimus [as well as suniti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmer, Jayne, Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195647
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793
_version_ 1783606105958514688
author Palmer, Jayne
Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R
author_facet Palmer, Jayne
Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R
author_sort Palmer, Jayne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a relatively rare and heterogenous group of tumors. Currently available treatment options for patients with progressive GEP-NETs include lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide ((177)Lu-Dotatate) and everolimus [as well as sunitinib for patients with pancreatic NETs (P-NETs)]. AIM: To perform a health economic analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic midgut-NETs or P-NETs in both Sweden and Norway. METHODS: Simulations were performed using a three-state partitioned survival model and analyses were performed separately for patients with midgut-NETs and P-NETs. Clinical input data were sourced from an indirect comparison that utilized survival data from clinical trials of (177)Lu-Dotatate and everolimus. The analyses were performed from the healthcare payer perspective over a time horizon of 20 years. For Sweden, future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. For Norway, a discount rate of 4% per annum was applied. RESULTS: For Sweden, improved survival outcomes and higher lifetime costs with (177)Lu-Dotatate resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SEK 391194 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for midgut NETs and SEK 16764 per QALY gained for P-NETs for (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus. For Norway, the corresponding ICERs were NOK 244444 per QALY gained and NOK 106451 per QALY gained, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were most sensitive to changes in drug acquisition costs and health state utility values. CONCLUSION: In both Sweden and Norway, from a healthcare provider perspective, (177)Lu-Dotatate is likely to be considered cost-effective relative to everolimus for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic, progressive midgut-NETs or P-NETs. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7642527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76425272020-11-13 Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden Palmer, Jayne Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R World J Clin Cases Observational Study BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a relatively rare and heterogenous group of tumors. Currently available treatment options for patients with progressive GEP-NETs include lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide ((177)Lu-Dotatate) and everolimus [as well as sunitinib for patients with pancreatic NETs (P-NETs)]. AIM: To perform a health economic analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic midgut-NETs or P-NETs in both Sweden and Norway. METHODS: Simulations were performed using a three-state partitioned survival model and analyses were performed separately for patients with midgut-NETs and P-NETs. Clinical input data were sourced from an indirect comparison that utilized survival data from clinical trials of (177)Lu-Dotatate and everolimus. The analyses were performed from the healthcare payer perspective over a time horizon of 20 years. For Sweden, future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. For Norway, a discount rate of 4% per annum was applied. RESULTS: For Sweden, improved survival outcomes and higher lifetime costs with (177)Lu-Dotatate resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SEK 391194 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for midgut NETs and SEK 16764 per QALY gained for P-NETs for (177)Lu-Dotatate compared with everolimus. For Norway, the corresponding ICERs were NOK 244444 per QALY gained and NOK 106451 per QALY gained, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were most sensitive to changes in drug acquisition costs and health state utility values. CONCLUSION: In both Sweden and Norway, from a healthcare provider perspective, (177)Lu-Dotatate is likely to be considered cost-effective relative to everolimus for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic, progressive midgut-NETs or P-NETs.  Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-10-26 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7642527/ /pubmed/33195647 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Palmer, Jayne
Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R
Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden
title Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden
title_full Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden
title_short Cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden
title_sort cost-effectiveness of lutetium ((177)lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in norway and sweden
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195647
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793
work_keys_str_mv AT palmerjayne costeffectivenessoflutetium177luoxodotreotidevseverolimusingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsinnorwayandsweden
AT leeuwenkamposcarr costeffectivenessoflutetium177luoxodotreotidevseverolimusingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsinnorwayandsweden