Cargando…
Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys
BACKGROUND: Horseshoe kidney (HK) with renal stones is challenging for urologists. Although both retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic approaches have been reported in some case reports, the therapeutic outcome of retroperitoneal compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy is u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195643 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4753 |
_version_ | 1783606109283549184 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Xin Wang, Yi Gao, Liang Song, Jin Wang, Jin-You Wang, Deng-Dian Ma, Jia-Xing Zhang, Zhi-Qiang Bi, Liang-Kuan Xie, Dong-Dong Yu, De-Xin |
author_facet | Chen, Xin Wang, Yi Gao, Liang Song, Jin Wang, Jin-You Wang, Deng-Dian Ma, Jia-Xing Zhang, Zhi-Qiang Bi, Liang-Kuan Xie, Dong-Dong Yu, De-Xin |
author_sort | Chen, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Horseshoe kidney (HK) with renal stones is challenging for urologists. Although both retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic approaches have been reported in some case reports, the therapeutic outcome of retroperitoneal compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy is unknown. AIM: To assess the efficacy of laparoscopic lithotripsy for renal stones in patients with HK. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 12 patients with HK and a limited number (n ≤ 3) of 20-40 mm renal stones treated with either retroperitoneal or transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy (June 2012 to May 2019). The perioperative data of both groups were compared including operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative fasting time, perioperative complications and stone-free rate (SFR). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed for age, gender, preoperative symptoms, body mass index, preoperative infection, hydronephrosis degree, largest stone diameter, stone number and isthmus thickness. The mean postoperative fasting time of the patients in the retroperitoneal group and the transperitoneal group was 1.29 ± 0.49 and 2.40 ± 0.89 d, respectively (P = 0.019). There was no significant difference in operation time (194.29 ± 102.48 min vs 151.40 ± 39.54 min, P = 0.399), estimated blood loss (48.57 ± 31.85 mL vs 72.00 ± 41.47 mL, P = 0.292) and length of hospital stay (12.14 ± 2.61 d vs 12.40 ± 3.21 d, P = 0.881) between the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal groups. All patients in both groups had a complete SFR and postoperative renal function was within the normal range. The change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from the preoperative stage to postoperative day 1 in the retroperitoneal group and the transperitoneal group was -3.86 ± 0.69 and -2.20 ± 2.17 mL/(min·1.73 m(2)), respectively (P = 0.176). From the preoperative stage to the 3-mo follow-up, the absolute change in eGFR values for patients in the retroperitoneal group and the transperitoneal group was -3.29 ± 1.11 and -2.40 ± 2.07 mL/(min·1.73 m(2)), respectively (P = 0.581). CONCLUSION: Both retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy seem to be safe and effective for HK patients with a limited number of 20-40 mm renal stones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7642540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76425402020-11-13 Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys Chen, Xin Wang, Yi Gao, Liang Song, Jin Wang, Jin-You Wang, Deng-Dian Ma, Jia-Xing Zhang, Zhi-Qiang Bi, Liang-Kuan Xie, Dong-Dong Yu, De-Xin World J Clin Cases Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Horseshoe kidney (HK) with renal stones is challenging for urologists. Although both retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic approaches have been reported in some case reports, the therapeutic outcome of retroperitoneal compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy is unknown. AIM: To assess the efficacy of laparoscopic lithotripsy for renal stones in patients with HK. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 12 patients with HK and a limited number (n ≤ 3) of 20-40 mm renal stones treated with either retroperitoneal or transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy (June 2012 to May 2019). The perioperative data of both groups were compared including operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative fasting time, perioperative complications and stone-free rate (SFR). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed for age, gender, preoperative symptoms, body mass index, preoperative infection, hydronephrosis degree, largest stone diameter, stone number and isthmus thickness. The mean postoperative fasting time of the patients in the retroperitoneal group and the transperitoneal group was 1.29 ± 0.49 and 2.40 ± 0.89 d, respectively (P = 0.019). There was no significant difference in operation time (194.29 ± 102.48 min vs 151.40 ± 39.54 min, P = 0.399), estimated blood loss (48.57 ± 31.85 mL vs 72.00 ± 41.47 mL, P = 0.292) and length of hospital stay (12.14 ± 2.61 d vs 12.40 ± 3.21 d, P = 0.881) between the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal groups. All patients in both groups had a complete SFR and postoperative renal function was within the normal range. The change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from the preoperative stage to postoperative day 1 in the retroperitoneal group and the transperitoneal group was -3.86 ± 0.69 and -2.20 ± 2.17 mL/(min·1.73 m(2)), respectively (P = 0.176). From the preoperative stage to the 3-mo follow-up, the absolute change in eGFR values for patients in the retroperitoneal group and the transperitoneal group was -3.29 ± 1.11 and -2.40 ± 2.07 mL/(min·1.73 m(2)), respectively (P = 0.581). CONCLUSION: Both retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy seem to be safe and effective for HK patients with a limited number of 20-40 mm renal stones. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-10-26 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7642540/ /pubmed/33195643 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4753 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Chen, Xin Wang, Yi Gao, Liang Song, Jin Wang, Jin-You Wang, Deng-Dian Ma, Jia-Xing Zhang, Zhi-Qiang Bi, Liang-Kuan Xie, Dong-Dong Yu, De-Xin Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys |
title | Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys |
title_full | Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys |
title_fullStr | Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys |
title_full_unstemmed | Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys |
title_short | Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys |
title_sort | retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic lithotripsy of 20-40 mm renal stones within horseshoe kidneys |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195643 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4753 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenxin retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT wangyi retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT gaoliang retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT songjin retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT wangjinyou retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT wangdengdian retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT majiaxing retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT zhangzhiqiang retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT biliangkuan retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT xiedongdong retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys AT yudexin retroperitonealvstransperitoneallaparoscopiclithotripsyof2040mmrenalstoneswithinhorseshoekidneys |