Cargando…
Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 35 flavouring substances attributed to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 69 (FGE.69), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. Thirty‐two substances have already been considered in FGE.69...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193867 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6265 |
_version_ | 1783606160973103104 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Degen, Gisela Marzin, Daniel Svendsen, Camilla Mennes, Wim |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Degen, Gisela Marzin, Daniel Svendsen, Camilla Mennes, Wim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 35 flavouring substances attributed to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 69 (FGE.69), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. Thirty‐two substances have already been considered in FGE.69 [FL‐no: 02.033, 02.034, 02.036, 02.064, 02.065, 02.080, 07.004, 07.013, 07.022, 07.023, 07.025, 07.026, 07.028, 07.029, 07.032, 07.038, 07.040, 07.042, 07.070, 07.079, 07.086, 07.087, 09.144, 09.178, 09.179, 09.189, 09.200, 09.231, 09.249, 09.476, 09.486 and 09.501]. The remaining three substances [FL‐no: 02.066, 07.024 and 07.027] have been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.215Rev1 and are considered in this revision FGE.69Rev1. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach, namely the Procedure, that integrates information on the structure–activity relationships, intake from current uses, Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel considered that for 33 flavouring substances evaluated through the Procedure the specifications are adequate and the Panel agrees with JECFA conclusions ‘No safety concern at estimated levels of intake as flavouring substances’ when based on the MSDI approach. For two flavouring substances [FL‐no: 07.038 and 07.042], there is insufficient information on their chemical identity to reach a final conclusion. For six substances [FL‐no: 02.066, 07.013, 07.024, 07.028, 07.032 and 07.086], there is no concern when the exposure was estimated based on the ‘modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake’ (mTAMDI) approach. For 28 substances, use levels are needed to calculate the mTAMDI estimates in order to identify those flavouring substances that need more refined exposure assessment and to finalise the evaluation accordingly. For one substance [FL‐no: 07.027], more reliable data on uses and use levels are required in order to finalise the safety evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7642830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76428302020-11-13 Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2 Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Degen, Gisela Marzin, Daniel Svendsen, Camilla Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 35 flavouring substances attributed to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 69 (FGE.69), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. Thirty‐two substances have already been considered in FGE.69 [FL‐no: 02.033, 02.034, 02.036, 02.064, 02.065, 02.080, 07.004, 07.013, 07.022, 07.023, 07.025, 07.026, 07.028, 07.029, 07.032, 07.038, 07.040, 07.042, 07.070, 07.079, 07.086, 07.087, 09.144, 09.178, 09.179, 09.189, 09.200, 09.231, 09.249, 09.476, 09.486 and 09.501]. The remaining three substances [FL‐no: 02.066, 07.024 and 07.027] have been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.215Rev1 and are considered in this revision FGE.69Rev1. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach, namely the Procedure, that integrates information on the structure–activity relationships, intake from current uses, Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel considered that for 33 flavouring substances evaluated through the Procedure the specifications are adequate and the Panel agrees with JECFA conclusions ‘No safety concern at estimated levels of intake as flavouring substances’ when based on the MSDI approach. For two flavouring substances [FL‐no: 07.038 and 07.042], there is insufficient information on their chemical identity to reach a final conclusion. For six substances [FL‐no: 02.066, 07.013, 07.024, 07.028, 07.032 and 07.086], there is no concern when the exposure was estimated based on the ‘modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake’ (mTAMDI) approach. For 28 substances, use levels are needed to calculate the mTAMDI estimates in order to identify those flavouring substances that need more refined exposure assessment and to finalise the evaluation accordingly. For one substance [FL‐no: 07.027], more reliable data on uses and use levels are required in order to finalise the safety evaluation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7642830/ /pubmed/33193867 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6265 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Degen, Gisela Marzin, Daniel Svendsen, Camilla Mennes, Wim Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2 |
title | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2 |
title_full | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2 |
title_fullStr | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2 |
title_short | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2 |
title_sort | scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 69, revision 1 (fge.69rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by jecfa (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by efsa in fge.16rev2 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193867 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT younesmaged scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT aquilinagabriele scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT fowlerpaul scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT frutosfernandezmariajose scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT furstpeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT gundertremyursula scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT mancomelania scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT moldeuspeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT passamontisabina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT shahromina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT waalkensberendsenine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT wolfledetlef scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT wrightmatthew scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT benigniromualdo scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT chipmankevin scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT cordellieugenia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT degengisela scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT marzindaniel scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT svendsencamilla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation69revision1fge69rev1considerationofaromaticsubstitutedsecondaryalcoholsketonesandrelatedestersevaluatedbyjecfa57thmeetingstructurallyrelatedtoaromaticketonesfromchemicalgroup21evaluatedbyefsainfge16rev2 |