Cargando…
Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the various nonlinear and time series models in describing the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. To this aim, we focus on 2 indicators: the number of total cases diagnosed with the disease, and the death toll. M...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.323 |
_version_ | 1783606173030678528 |
---|---|
author | Celik, Senol Ankarali, Handan Pasin, Ozge |
author_facet | Celik, Senol Ankarali, Handan Pasin, Ozge |
author_sort | Celik, Senol |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the various nonlinear and time series models in describing the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. To this aim, we focus on 2 indicators: the number of total cases diagnosed with the disease, and the death toll. METHODS: The data used for this study are based on the reports of China between January 22 and June 18, 2020. We used nonlinear growth curves and some time series models for prediction of the number of total cases and total deaths. The determination coefficient (R(2)), mean square error (MSE), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to select the best model. RESULTS: Our results show that while the Sloboda and ARIMA (0,2,1) models are the most convenient models that elucidate the cumulative number of cases; the Lundqvist-Korf model and Holt linear trend exponential smoothing model are the most suitable models for analyzing the cumulative number of deaths. Our time series models forecast that on 19 July, the number of total cases and total deaths will be 85,589 and 4639, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will be of great importance when it comes to modeling outbreak indicators for other countries. This information will enable governments to implement suitable measures for subsequent similar situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7642915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76429152020-11-05 Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June Celik, Senol Ankarali, Handan Pasin, Ozge Disaster Med Public Health Prep Original Research OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the various nonlinear and time series models in describing the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. To this aim, we focus on 2 indicators: the number of total cases diagnosed with the disease, and the death toll. METHODS: The data used for this study are based on the reports of China between January 22 and June 18, 2020. We used nonlinear growth curves and some time series models for prediction of the number of total cases and total deaths. The determination coefficient (R(2)), mean square error (MSE), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to select the best model. RESULTS: Our results show that while the Sloboda and ARIMA (0,2,1) models are the most convenient models that elucidate the cumulative number of cases; the Lundqvist-Korf model and Holt linear trend exponential smoothing model are the most suitable models for analyzing the cumulative number of deaths. Our time series models forecast that on 19 July, the number of total cases and total deaths will be 85,589 and 4639, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will be of great importance when it comes to modeling outbreak indicators for other countries. This information will enable governments to implement suitable measures for subsequent similar situations. Cambridge University Press 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7642915/ /pubmed/32900401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.323 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Celik, Senol Ankarali, Handan Pasin, Ozge Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June |
title | Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June |
title_full | Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June |
title_fullStr | Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June |
title_short | Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June |
title_sort | modeling of covid-19 outbreak indicators in china between january and june |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT celiksenol modelingofcovid19outbreakindicatorsinchinabetweenjanuaryandjune AT ankaralihandan modelingofcovid19outbreakindicatorsinchinabetweenjanuaryandjune AT pasinozge modelingofcovid19outbreakindicatorsinchinabetweenjanuaryandjune |