Cargando…

Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the various nonlinear and time series models in describing the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. To this aim, we focus on 2 indicators: the number of total cases diagnosed with the disease, and the death toll. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celik, Senol, Ankarali, Handan, Pasin, Ozge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.323
_version_ 1783606173030678528
author Celik, Senol
Ankarali, Handan
Pasin, Ozge
author_facet Celik, Senol
Ankarali, Handan
Pasin, Ozge
author_sort Celik, Senol
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the various nonlinear and time series models in describing the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. To this aim, we focus on 2 indicators: the number of total cases diagnosed with the disease, and the death toll. METHODS: The data used for this study are based on the reports of China between January 22 and June 18, 2020. We used nonlinear growth curves and some time series models for prediction of the number of total cases and total deaths. The determination coefficient (R(2)), mean square error (MSE), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to select the best model. RESULTS: Our results show that while the Sloboda and ARIMA (0,2,1) models are the most convenient models that elucidate the cumulative number of cases; the Lundqvist-Korf model and Holt linear trend exponential smoothing model are the most suitable models for analyzing the cumulative number of deaths. Our time series models forecast that on 19 July, the number of total cases and total deaths will be 85,589 and 4639, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will be of great importance when it comes to modeling outbreak indicators for other countries. This information will enable governments to implement suitable measures for subsequent similar situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7642915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76429152020-11-05 Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June Celik, Senol Ankarali, Handan Pasin, Ozge Disaster Med Public Health Prep Original Research OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the various nonlinear and time series models in describing the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. To this aim, we focus on 2 indicators: the number of total cases diagnosed with the disease, and the death toll. METHODS: The data used for this study are based on the reports of China between January 22 and June 18, 2020. We used nonlinear growth curves and some time series models for prediction of the number of total cases and total deaths. The determination coefficient (R(2)), mean square error (MSE), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to select the best model. RESULTS: Our results show that while the Sloboda and ARIMA (0,2,1) models are the most convenient models that elucidate the cumulative number of cases; the Lundqvist-Korf model and Holt linear trend exponential smoothing model are the most suitable models for analyzing the cumulative number of deaths. Our time series models forecast that on 19 July, the number of total cases and total deaths will be 85,589 and 4639, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will be of great importance when it comes to modeling outbreak indicators for other countries. This information will enable governments to implement suitable measures for subsequent similar situations. Cambridge University Press 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7642915/ /pubmed/32900401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.323 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Celik, Senol
Ankarali, Handan
Pasin, Ozge
Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June
title Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June
title_full Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June
title_fullStr Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June
title_full_unstemmed Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June
title_short Modeling of COVID-19 Outbreak Indicators in China Between January and June
title_sort modeling of covid-19 outbreak indicators in china between january and june
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.323
work_keys_str_mv AT celiksenol modelingofcovid19outbreakindicatorsinchinabetweenjanuaryandjune
AT ankaralihandan modelingofcovid19outbreakindicatorsinchinabetweenjanuaryandjune
AT pasinozge modelingofcovid19outbreakindicatorsinchinabetweenjanuaryandjune