Cargando…
Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?
In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204410 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24934.1 |
_version_ | 1783606189869760512 |
---|---|
author | Conti, Rena M. David, Frank S. |
author_facet | Conti, Rena M. David, Frank S. |
author_sort | Conti, Rena M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due to high drug prices. In fact, the empirical evidence supporting these claims is weak, and the pay twice argument distracts from important efforts to ensure that impactful new drugs continue to be developed and made widely available to patients who need them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7642989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76429892020-11-16 Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? Conti, Rena M. David, Frank S. F1000Res Opinion Article In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due to high drug prices. In fact, the empirical evidence supporting these claims is weak, and the pay twice argument distracts from important efforts to ensure that impactful new drugs continue to be developed and made widely available to patients who need them. F1000 Research Limited 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7642989/ /pubmed/33204410 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24934.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Conti RM and David FS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Article Conti, Rena M. David, Frank S. Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? |
title | Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? |
title_full | Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? |
title_fullStr | Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? |
title_full_unstemmed | Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? |
title_short | Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? |
title_sort | public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do americans pay twice for drugs? |
topic | Opinion Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204410 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24934.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT contirenam publicresearchfundingandpharmaceuticalpricesdoamericanspaytwicefordrugs AT davidfranks publicresearchfundingandpharmaceuticalpricesdoamericanspaytwicefordrugs |