Cargando…

Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?

In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conti, Rena M., David, Frank S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204410
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24934.1
_version_ 1783606189869760512
author Conti, Rena M.
David, Frank S.
author_facet Conti, Rena M.
David, Frank S.
author_sort Conti, Rena M.
collection PubMed
description In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due to high drug prices. In fact, the empirical evidence supporting these claims is weak, and the pay twice argument distracts from important efforts to ensure that impactful new drugs continue to be developed and made widely available to patients who need them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7642989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76429892020-11-16 Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? Conti, Rena M. David, Frank S. F1000Res Opinion Article In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due to high drug prices. In fact, the empirical evidence supporting these claims is weak, and the pay twice argument distracts from important efforts to ensure that impactful new drugs continue to be developed and made widely available to patients who need them. F1000 Research Limited 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7642989/ /pubmed/33204410 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24934.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Conti RM and David FS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion Article
Conti, Rena M.
David, Frank S.
Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?
title Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?
title_full Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?
title_fullStr Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?
title_full_unstemmed Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?
title_short Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs?
title_sort public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do americans pay twice for drugs?
topic Opinion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204410
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24934.1
work_keys_str_mv AT contirenam publicresearchfundingandpharmaceuticalpricesdoamericanspaytwicefordrugs
AT davidfranks publicresearchfundingandpharmaceuticalpricesdoamericanspaytwicefordrugs