Cargando…

Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research

Background: The epidemiology of critical illness in India is distinct from high-income countries. However, limited data exist on resource availability, staffing patterns, case-mix and outcomes from critical illness. Critical care registries, by enabling a continual evaluation of service provision, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adhikari, Neill K. J., Arali, Rajeshwari, Attanayake, Udara, Balasundaram, Sampath, Beane, Abi, Chakravarthy, Vijay, Channanath Ashraf, Niyaz, Darshana, Sri, Devaprasad, Dedeepiya, Dondorp, Arjen M., Fowler, Robert, Haniffa, Rashan, Ishani, Pramodya, James, Augustian, Jawad, Issrah, Jayakumar, Devachandran, Kodipilly, Chamira, Laxmappa, Rakesh, Mangal, Kishore, Mani, Ashwin, Mathew, Meghena, Patodia, Sristi, Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan, Priyadarshini, Dilanthi, Pulicken, Mathew, Rabindrarajan, Ebenezer, Ramachandran, Pratheema, Ramesh, Kavita, Rani, Usha, Ranjit, Suchitra, Ramaiyan, Ananth, Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan, Ranganathan, Lakshmi, Rashan, Thalha, Dominic Savio, Raymond, Selva, Jaganathan, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar, Tripathy, Swagata, Tolppa, Timo, Udayanga, Ishara, Venkataraman, Ramesh, Vijayan, Deepak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16152.2
_version_ 1783606190816624640
author Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Arali, Rajeshwari
Attanayake, Udara
Balasundaram, Sampath
Beane, Abi
Chakravarthy, Vijay
Channanath Ashraf, Niyaz
Darshana, Sri
Devaprasad, Dedeepiya
Dondorp, Arjen M.
Fowler, Robert
Haniffa, Rashan
Ishani, Pramodya
James, Augustian
Jawad, Issrah
Jayakumar, Devachandran
Kodipilly, Chamira
Laxmappa, Rakesh
Mangal, Kishore
Mani, Ashwin
Mathew, Meghena
Patodia, Sristi
Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan
Priyadarshini, Dilanthi
Pulicken, Mathew
Rabindrarajan, Ebenezer
Ramachandran, Pratheema
Ramesh, Kavita
Rani, Usha
Ranjit, Suchitra
Ramaiyan, Ananth
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Ranganathan, Lakshmi
Rashan, Thalha
Dominic Savio, Raymond
Selva, Jaganathan
Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar
Tripathy, Swagata
Tolppa, Timo
Udayanga, Ishara
Venkataraman, Ramesh
Vijayan, Deepak
author_facet Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Arali, Rajeshwari
Attanayake, Udara
Balasundaram, Sampath
Beane, Abi
Chakravarthy, Vijay
Channanath Ashraf, Niyaz
Darshana, Sri
Devaprasad, Dedeepiya
Dondorp, Arjen M.
Fowler, Robert
Haniffa, Rashan
Ishani, Pramodya
James, Augustian
Jawad, Issrah
Jayakumar, Devachandran
Kodipilly, Chamira
Laxmappa, Rakesh
Mangal, Kishore
Mani, Ashwin
Mathew, Meghena
Patodia, Sristi
Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan
Priyadarshini, Dilanthi
Pulicken, Mathew
Rabindrarajan, Ebenezer
Ramachandran, Pratheema
Ramesh, Kavita
Rani, Usha
Ranjit, Suchitra
Ramaiyan, Ananth
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Ranganathan, Lakshmi
Rashan, Thalha
Dominic Savio, Raymond
Selva, Jaganathan
Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar
Tripathy, Swagata
Tolppa, Timo
Udayanga, Ishara
Venkataraman, Ramesh
Vijayan, Deepak
author_sort Adhikari, Neill K. J.
collection PubMed
description Background: The epidemiology of critical illness in India is distinct from high-income countries. However, limited data exist on resource availability, staffing patterns, case-mix and outcomes from critical illness. Critical care registries, by enabling a continual evaluation of service provision, epidemiology, resource availability and quality, can bridge these gaps in information. In January 2019, we established the Indian Registry of IntenSive care to map capacity and describe case-mix and outcomes. In this report, we describe the implementation process, preliminary results, opportunities for improvement, challenges and future directions. Methods: All adult and paediatric ICUs in India were eligible to join if they committed to entering data for ICU admissions. Data are collected by a designated representative through the electronic data collection platform of the registry. IRIS hosts data on a secure cloud-based server and access to the data is restricted to designated personnel and is protected with standard firewall and a valid secure socket layer (SSL) certificate. Each participating ICU owns and has access to its own data. All participating units have access to de-identified network-wide aggregate data which enables benchmarking and comparison. Results: The registry currently includes 14 adult and 1 paediatric ICU in the network (232 adult ICU beds and 9 paediatric ICU beds). There have been 8721 patient encounters with a mean age of 56.9 (SD 18.9); 61.4% of patients were male and admissions to participating ICUs were predominantly unplanned (87.5%). At admission, most patients (61.5%) received antibiotics, 17.3% needed vasopressors, and 23.7% were mechanically ventilated. Mortality for the entire cohort was 9%.  Data availability for demographics, clinical parameters, and indicators of admission severity was greater than 95%. Conclusions: IRIS represents a successful model for the continual evaluation of critical illness epidemiology in India and provides a framework for the deployment of multi-centre quality improvement and context-relevant clinical research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7642994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76429942020-11-13 Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research Adhikari, Neill K. J. Arali, Rajeshwari Attanayake, Udara Balasundaram, Sampath Beane, Abi Chakravarthy, Vijay Channanath Ashraf, Niyaz Darshana, Sri Devaprasad, Dedeepiya Dondorp, Arjen M. Fowler, Robert Haniffa, Rashan Ishani, Pramodya James, Augustian Jawad, Issrah Jayakumar, Devachandran Kodipilly, Chamira Laxmappa, Rakesh Mangal, Kishore Mani, Ashwin Mathew, Meghena Patodia, Sristi Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan Priyadarshini, Dilanthi Pulicken, Mathew Rabindrarajan, Ebenezer Ramachandran, Pratheema Ramesh, Kavita Rani, Usha Ranjit, Suchitra Ramaiyan, Ananth Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Ranganathan, Lakshmi Rashan, Thalha Dominic Savio, Raymond Selva, Jaganathan Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Tripathy, Swagata Tolppa, Timo Udayanga, Ishara Venkataraman, Ramesh Vijayan, Deepak Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: The epidemiology of critical illness in India is distinct from high-income countries. However, limited data exist on resource availability, staffing patterns, case-mix and outcomes from critical illness. Critical care registries, by enabling a continual evaluation of service provision, epidemiology, resource availability and quality, can bridge these gaps in information. In January 2019, we established the Indian Registry of IntenSive care to map capacity and describe case-mix and outcomes. In this report, we describe the implementation process, preliminary results, opportunities for improvement, challenges and future directions. Methods: All adult and paediatric ICUs in India were eligible to join if they committed to entering data for ICU admissions. Data are collected by a designated representative through the electronic data collection platform of the registry. IRIS hosts data on a secure cloud-based server and access to the data is restricted to designated personnel and is protected with standard firewall and a valid secure socket layer (SSL) certificate. Each participating ICU owns and has access to its own data. All participating units have access to de-identified network-wide aggregate data which enables benchmarking and comparison. Results: The registry currently includes 14 adult and 1 paediatric ICU in the network (232 adult ICU beds and 9 paediatric ICU beds). There have been 8721 patient encounters with a mean age of 56.9 (SD 18.9); 61.4% of patients were male and admissions to participating ICUs were predominantly unplanned (87.5%). At admission, most patients (61.5%) received antibiotics, 17.3% needed vasopressors, and 23.7% were mechanically ventilated. Mortality for the entire cohort was 9%.  Data availability for demographics, clinical parameters, and indicators of admission severity was greater than 95%. Conclusions: IRIS represents a successful model for the continual evaluation of critical illness epidemiology in India and provides a framework for the deployment of multi-centre quality improvement and context-relevant clinical research. F1000 Research Limited 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7642994/ /pubmed/33195819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16152.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Adhikari NKJ et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Arali, Rajeshwari
Attanayake, Udara
Balasundaram, Sampath
Beane, Abi
Chakravarthy, Vijay
Channanath Ashraf, Niyaz
Darshana, Sri
Devaprasad, Dedeepiya
Dondorp, Arjen M.
Fowler, Robert
Haniffa, Rashan
Ishani, Pramodya
James, Augustian
Jawad, Issrah
Jayakumar, Devachandran
Kodipilly, Chamira
Laxmappa, Rakesh
Mangal, Kishore
Mani, Ashwin
Mathew, Meghena
Patodia, Sristi
Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan
Priyadarshini, Dilanthi
Pulicken, Mathew
Rabindrarajan, Ebenezer
Ramachandran, Pratheema
Ramesh, Kavita
Rani, Usha
Ranjit, Suchitra
Ramaiyan, Ananth
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Ranganathan, Lakshmi
Rashan, Thalha
Dominic Savio, Raymond
Selva, Jaganathan
Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar
Tripathy, Swagata
Tolppa, Timo
Udayanga, Ishara
Venkataraman, Ramesh
Vijayan, Deepak
Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research
title Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research
title_full Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research
title_fullStr Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research
title_full_unstemmed Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research
title_short Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research
title_sort implementing an intensive care registry in india: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16152.2
work_keys_str_mv AT adhikarineillkj implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT aralirajeshwari implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT attanayakeudara implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT balasundaramsampath implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT beaneabi implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT chakravarthyvijay implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT channanathashrafniyaz implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT darshanasri implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT devaprasaddedeepiya implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT dondorparjenm implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT fowlerrobert implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT haniffarashan implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT ishanipramodya implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT jamesaugustian implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT jawadissrah implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT jayakumardevachandran implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT kodipillychamira implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT laxmapparakesh implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT mangalkishore implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT maniashwin implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT mathewmeghena implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT patodiasristi implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT pattnaikrajyabardhan implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT priyadarshinidilanthi implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT pulickenmathew implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT rabindrarajanebenezer implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT ramachandranpratheema implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT rameshkavita implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT raniusha implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT ranjitsuchitra implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT ramaiyanananth implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT ramakrishnannagarajan implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT ranganathanlakshmi implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT rashanthalha implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT dominicsavioraymond implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT selvajaganathan implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT tirupakuzhivijayaraghavanbharathkumar implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT tripathyswagata implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT tolppatimo implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT udayangaishara implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT venkataramanramesh implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch
AT vijayandeepak implementinganintensivecareregistryinindiapreliminaryresultsofthecasemixprogramandanopportunityforqualityimprovementandresearch