Cargando…
Implications of historical height loss for prevalent vertebral fracture, spinal osteoarthritis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease
We recently uncovered an association between spinal osteoarthritis and height loss that was independent of incident vertebral fracture. However, the optimal cut-off value of historical height loss (HHL) for discriminating spinal osteoarthritis has not been reported. This cross-sectional study aimed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76074-6 |
Sumario: | We recently uncovered an association between spinal osteoarthritis and height loss that was independent of incident vertebral fracture. However, the optimal cut-off value of historical height loss (HHL) for discriminating spinal osteoarthritis has not been reported. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the implications of HHL for prevalent vertebral fracture, spinal osteoarthritis, and other co-morbidities in postmenopausal women from the Nagano Cohort Study. In total, 942 Japanese postmenopausal outpatients (mean age: 66.7 years) were investigated. HHL was estimated by arm span – body height difference. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed significant independent associations of HHL with prevalent vertebral fracture (odds ratio [OR] 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55–2.29), spinal osteoarthritis (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.31–1.88), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.34–2.28) after adjustment for other confounders. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of HHL was conducted to discriminate the prevalence of co-morbidities. The optimal cut-off value as defined by the Youden index for prevalent vertebral fracture, spinal osteoarthritis, and GERD was 4.95 cm (area under the curve [AUC] 0.740; 95% CI 0.704–0.776), 2.75 cm (AUC 0.701; 95% CI 0.667–0.735), and 5.35 cm (AUC 0.692; 95% CI 0.629–0.754), respectively. Better understanding of the above relationships and proposed cut-off values will be useful for improving the diagnosis, care management, and quality of life in elderly patients. |
---|