Cargando…

Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?

This study investigated the gender differences in deception and their neural basis in the perspective of two‐person neuroscience. Both male and female dyads were asked to perform a face‐to‐face spontaneous sender–receiver deception task, while their neural activities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Mei, Zhang, Tingyu, Zhang, Ruqian, Wang, Ning, Yin, Qing, Li, Yangzhuo, Liu, Jieqiong, Liu, Tao, Li, Xianchun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25173
_version_ 1783606271137546240
author Chen, Mei
Zhang, Tingyu
Zhang, Ruqian
Wang, Ning
Yin, Qing
Li, Yangzhuo
Liu, Jieqiong
Liu, Tao
Li, Xianchun
author_facet Chen, Mei
Zhang, Tingyu
Zhang, Ruqian
Wang, Ning
Yin, Qing
Li, Yangzhuo
Liu, Jieqiong
Liu, Tao
Li, Xianchun
author_sort Chen, Mei
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the gender differences in deception and their neural basis in the perspective of two‐person neuroscience. Both male and female dyads were asked to perform a face‐to‐face spontaneous sender–receiver deception task, while their neural activities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and right temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) were recorded simultaneously using functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)‐based hyperscanning. Male and female dyads displayed similar deception rate, successful deception rate, and eye contact in deception trials. Moreover, eye contact in deception trials was positively correlated with the success rate of deception in both genders. The fNIRS data showed that the interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) in PFC was significantly enhanced only in female dyads when performed the deception task, while INS in rTPJ was increased only in male dyads. Such INS was correlated with the success rate of deception in both dyads. Granger causality analysis showed that no significant directionality between time series of PFC (or rTPJ) in each dyad, which could indicate that sender and receiver played equally important role during deception task. Finally, enhanced INS in PFC in female dyads mediated the contribution of eye contact to the success rate of deception. All findings in this study suggest that differential patterns of INS are recruited when male and female dyads perform the face‐to‐face deception task. To our knowledge, this is the first interbrain evidence for gender difference of successful deception, which could make us a deeper understanding of spontaneous face‐to‐face deception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7643389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76433892020-11-13 Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference? Chen, Mei Zhang, Tingyu Zhang, Ruqian Wang, Ning Yin, Qing Li, Yangzhuo Liu, Jieqiong Liu, Tao Li, Xianchun Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles This study investigated the gender differences in deception and their neural basis in the perspective of two‐person neuroscience. Both male and female dyads were asked to perform a face‐to‐face spontaneous sender–receiver deception task, while their neural activities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and right temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) were recorded simultaneously using functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)‐based hyperscanning. Male and female dyads displayed similar deception rate, successful deception rate, and eye contact in deception trials. Moreover, eye contact in deception trials was positively correlated with the success rate of deception in both genders. The fNIRS data showed that the interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) in PFC was significantly enhanced only in female dyads when performed the deception task, while INS in rTPJ was increased only in male dyads. Such INS was correlated with the success rate of deception in both dyads. Granger causality analysis showed that no significant directionality between time series of PFC (or rTPJ) in each dyad, which could indicate that sender and receiver played equally important role during deception task. Finally, enhanced INS in PFC in female dyads mediated the contribution of eye contact to the success rate of deception. All findings in this study suggest that differential patterns of INS are recruited when male and female dyads perform the face‐to‐face deception task. To our knowledge, this is the first interbrain evidence for gender difference of successful deception, which could make us a deeper understanding of spontaneous face‐to‐face deception. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7643389/ /pubmed/32808714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25173 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Chen, Mei
Zhang, Tingyu
Zhang, Ruqian
Wang, Ning
Yin, Qing
Li, Yangzhuo
Liu, Jieqiong
Liu, Tao
Li, Xianchun
Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?
title Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?
title_full Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?
title_fullStr Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?
title_full_unstemmed Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?
title_short Neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?
title_sort neural alignment during face‐to‐face spontaneous deception: does gender make a difference?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25173
work_keys_str_mv AT chenmei neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT zhangtingyu neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT zhangruqian neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT wangning neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT yinqing neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT liyangzhuo neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT liujieqiong neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT liutao neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference
AT lixianchun neuralalignmentduringfacetofacespontaneousdeceptiondoesgendermakeadifference