Cargando…
Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has advocated for the integration of dental care into the primary healthcare (PHC) setting, including oral urgent treatment (OUT). However, the knowledge necessary for OUT implementation in this setting is still limited. Thus, this study aimed to describe th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05859-2 |
_version_ | 1783606279593263104 |
---|---|
author | Ramos, Danielle Viana Ribeiro Miraglia, João Luiz Monteiro, Camila Nascimento Borchardt, Danielle Tribis, Leonardo Sanchez, Thais Paragis Bonfim, Daiana da Costa Palacio, Danielle da Luz Rosário de Souza, Maria de Brito Mota, Marília Jesus Batista |
author_facet | Ramos, Danielle Viana Ribeiro Miraglia, João Luiz Monteiro, Camila Nascimento Borchardt, Danielle Tribis, Leonardo Sanchez, Thais Paragis Bonfim, Daiana da Costa Palacio, Danielle da Luz Rosário de Souza, Maria de Brito Mota, Marília Jesus Batista |
author_sort | Ramos, Danielle Viana Ribeiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has advocated for the integration of dental care into the primary healthcare (PHC) setting, including oral urgent treatment (OUT). However, the knowledge necessary for OUT implementation in this setting is still limited. Thus, this study aimed to describe the impact of the implementation of oral disease risk assessment tools for oral health management in PHC. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that included individuals served by a single public PHC unit, with integrated oral healthcare teams, located in the south region of the city of São Paulo, Brazil, between April of 2015 and March of 2017. Data were collected from dental records. Three co-primary endpoints: same day treatment offered, first future appointment scheduled fulfilled, and treatment plan completed were compared before and after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT. RESULTS: A total of 1214 individuals that sought OUT, 599 before and 615 after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT were included in the study. All three co-primary endpoints had significant changes after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT. Individuals were significantly more likely to be offered same day treatment after (39.9%; 95% CI:36.0–43.9%) than before (9.4%; 95% CI: 7.2–12.0%), to fulfill their first future appointment scheduled after (34.9%; 95% CI:31.1–38.8%) than before (20.7%; 95% CI: 17.5–24.2%), and to have their treatment plan completed after (14.3%; 95% CI:11.6–17.4%) than before (10.0%; 95% CI: 7.7–12.7%) the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence of the positive impact oral disease risk assessment tools could have in the organization of OUT in PHC settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05859-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7643441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76434412020-11-06 Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study Ramos, Danielle Viana Ribeiro Miraglia, João Luiz Monteiro, Camila Nascimento Borchardt, Danielle Tribis, Leonardo Sanchez, Thais Paragis Bonfim, Daiana da Costa Palacio, Danielle da Luz Rosário de Souza, Maria de Brito Mota, Marília Jesus Batista BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has advocated for the integration of dental care into the primary healthcare (PHC) setting, including oral urgent treatment (OUT). However, the knowledge necessary for OUT implementation in this setting is still limited. Thus, this study aimed to describe the impact of the implementation of oral disease risk assessment tools for oral health management in PHC. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that included individuals served by a single public PHC unit, with integrated oral healthcare teams, located in the south region of the city of São Paulo, Brazil, between April of 2015 and March of 2017. Data were collected from dental records. Three co-primary endpoints: same day treatment offered, first future appointment scheduled fulfilled, and treatment plan completed were compared before and after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT. RESULTS: A total of 1214 individuals that sought OUT, 599 before and 615 after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT were included in the study. All three co-primary endpoints had significant changes after the implementation of oral disease risk assessment for OUT. Individuals were significantly more likely to be offered same day treatment after (39.9%; 95% CI:36.0–43.9%) than before (9.4%; 95% CI: 7.2–12.0%), to fulfill their first future appointment scheduled after (34.9%; 95% CI:31.1–38.8%) than before (20.7%; 95% CI: 17.5–24.2%), and to have their treatment plan completed after (14.3%; 95% CI:11.6–17.4%) than before (10.0%; 95% CI: 7.7–12.7%) the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence of the positive impact oral disease risk assessment tools could have in the organization of OUT in PHC settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05859-2. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7643441/ /pubmed/33148246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05859-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ramos, Danielle Viana Ribeiro Miraglia, João Luiz Monteiro, Camila Nascimento Borchardt, Danielle Tribis, Leonardo Sanchez, Thais Paragis Bonfim, Daiana da Costa Palacio, Danielle da Luz Rosário de Souza, Maria de Brito Mota, Marília Jesus Batista Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study |
title | Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in primary healthcare: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05859-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramosdaniellevianaribeiro riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT miragliajoaoluiz riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT monteirocamilanascimento riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT borchardtdanielle riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT tribisleonardo riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT sanchezthaisparagis riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT bonfimdaiana riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT dacostapalaciodanielle riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT daluzrosariodesouzamaria riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy AT debritomotamariliajesusbatista riskassessmentfororalurgenttreatmentinprimaryhealthcareacrosssectionalstudy |