Cargando…
Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework
BACKGROUND: Medical tests provide important information to guide clinical management. Overtesting, however, may cause harm to patients and the healthcare system, including through misdiagnosis, false positives, false negatives and overdiagnosis. Clinicians are ultimately responsible for test request...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05844-9 |
_version_ | 1783606283266424832 |
---|---|
author | Lam, Justin H. Pickles, Kristen Stanaway, Fiona F. Bell, Katy J. L. |
author_facet | Lam, Justin H. Pickles, Kristen Stanaway, Fiona F. Bell, Katy J. L. |
author_sort | Lam, Justin H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical tests provide important information to guide clinical management. Overtesting, however, may cause harm to patients and the healthcare system, including through misdiagnosis, false positives, false negatives and overdiagnosis. Clinicians are ultimately responsible for test requests, and are therefore ideally positioned to prevent overtesting and its unintended consequences. Through this narrative literature review and workshop discussion with experts at the Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference (Sydney, 2019), we aimed to identify and establish a thematic framework of factors that influence clinicians to request non-recommended and unnecessary tests. METHODS: Articles exploring factors affecting clinician test ordering behaviour were identified through a systematic search of MedLine in April 2019, forward and backward citation searches and content experts. Two authors screened abstract titles and abstracts, and two authors screened full text for inclusion. Identified factors were categorised into a preliminary framework which was subsequently presented at the PODC for iterative development. RESULTS: “Intrapersonal” – fear of malpractice and litigation; clinician knowledge and understanding; intolerance of uncertainty and risk aversion; cognitive biases and experiences; sense of medical obligation; “Interpersonal” – pressure from patients and doctor-patient relationship; pressure from colleagues and medical culture; “Environment/context” – guidelines, protocols and policies; financial incentives and ownership of tests; time constraints, physical vulnerabilities and language barriers; availability and ease of access to tests; pre-emptive testing to facilitate subsequent care; contemporary medical practice and new technology. CONCLUSION: This thematic framework may raise awareness of overtesting and prompt clinicians to change their test request behaviour. The development of a scale to assess clinician knowledge, attitudes and practices is planned to allow evaluation of clinician-targeted interventions to reduce overtesting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05844-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7643462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76434622020-11-06 Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework Lam, Justin H. Pickles, Kristen Stanaway, Fiona F. Bell, Katy J. L. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical tests provide important information to guide clinical management. Overtesting, however, may cause harm to patients and the healthcare system, including through misdiagnosis, false positives, false negatives and overdiagnosis. Clinicians are ultimately responsible for test requests, and are therefore ideally positioned to prevent overtesting and its unintended consequences. Through this narrative literature review and workshop discussion with experts at the Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference (Sydney, 2019), we aimed to identify and establish a thematic framework of factors that influence clinicians to request non-recommended and unnecessary tests. METHODS: Articles exploring factors affecting clinician test ordering behaviour were identified through a systematic search of MedLine in April 2019, forward and backward citation searches and content experts. Two authors screened abstract titles and abstracts, and two authors screened full text for inclusion. Identified factors were categorised into a preliminary framework which was subsequently presented at the PODC for iterative development. RESULTS: “Intrapersonal” – fear of malpractice and litigation; clinician knowledge and understanding; intolerance of uncertainty and risk aversion; cognitive biases and experiences; sense of medical obligation; “Interpersonal” – pressure from patients and doctor-patient relationship; pressure from colleagues and medical culture; “Environment/context” – guidelines, protocols and policies; financial incentives and ownership of tests; time constraints, physical vulnerabilities and language barriers; availability and ease of access to tests; pre-emptive testing to facilitate subsequent care; contemporary medical practice and new technology. CONCLUSION: This thematic framework may raise awareness of overtesting and prompt clinicians to change their test request behaviour. The development of a scale to assess clinician knowledge, attitudes and practices is planned to allow evaluation of clinician-targeted interventions to reduce overtesting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05844-9. BioMed Central 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7643462/ /pubmed/33148242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05844-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lam, Justin H. Pickles, Kristen Stanaway, Fiona F. Bell, Katy J. L. Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework |
title | Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework |
title_full | Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework |
title_fullStr | Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework |
title_short | Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework |
title_sort | why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05844-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamjustinh whycliniciansovertestdevelopmentofathematicframework AT pickleskristen whycliniciansovertestdevelopmentofathematicframework AT stanawayfionaf whycliniciansovertestdevelopmentofathematicframework AT bellkatyjl whycliniciansovertestdevelopmentofathematicframework |