Cargando…

Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study

Neonatal diabetes presents <6 months of life but delays in recognition result in presentation with life-threatening hyperglycaemia/diabetic ketoacidosis. Early identification and rapid genetic diagnosis is crucial and ensures correct treatment/management. Adding ‘glucose’ to newborn bloodspot scr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shepherd, Maggie, Knight, Bridget A, Laskey, Katherine, McDonald, Timothy James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037312
_version_ 1783606289330339840
author Shepherd, Maggie
Knight, Bridget A
Laskey, Katherine
McDonald, Timothy James
author_facet Shepherd, Maggie
Knight, Bridget A
Laskey, Katherine
McDonald, Timothy James
author_sort Shepherd, Maggie
collection PubMed
description Neonatal diabetes presents <6 months of life but delays in recognition result in presentation with life-threatening hyperglycaemia/diabetic ketoacidosis. Early identification and rapid genetic diagnosis is crucial and ensures correct treatment/management. Adding ‘glucose’ to newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) could aid prompt detection but requires evidence of parental acceptance. OBJECTIVES: Increase understanding of parental experience of presentation/recognition of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of glucose testing within NBS. SETTING: UK families confirmed with a genetic diagnosis of neonatal diabetes, November 2014–2018, were invited to participate. PARTICIPANTS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 parents of 14 children. 8 had transient neonatal diabetes: KCNJ11 (n=5), ABCC8 (n=1), 6q24 (n=2), 6 had permanent neonatal diabetes: KCNJ11 (n=4), INS (n=1), homozygous GCK (n=1). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Interviews audio recorded, transcribed and subjected to thematic content analysis. RESULTS: 3 key themes emerged: 1. Babies were extremely ill at hospital admission, with extended stays in intensive care required. 2. Identification of diabetes was not ‘standardised’ and perceived a ‘chance’ finding. 3. Adding glucose to NBS was universally considered extremely positive. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of neonatal diabetes is frequently delayed, resulting in critically ill presentation with prolonged intensive care support, additional healthcare costs and familial distress. Potential to detect hyperglycaemia earlier was universally endorsed by parents with no negative consequences identified. Although further study including a larger number of individuals is needed to confirm our findings this study provides the first evidence of acceptability of glucose testing fulfilling Wilson-Jungner criteria for implementation within the NBS programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7643500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76435002020-11-12 Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study Shepherd, Maggie Knight, Bridget A Laskey, Katherine McDonald, Timothy James BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology Neonatal diabetes presents <6 months of life but delays in recognition result in presentation with life-threatening hyperglycaemia/diabetic ketoacidosis. Early identification and rapid genetic diagnosis is crucial and ensures correct treatment/management. Adding ‘glucose’ to newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) could aid prompt detection but requires evidence of parental acceptance. OBJECTIVES: Increase understanding of parental experience of presentation/recognition of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of glucose testing within NBS. SETTING: UK families confirmed with a genetic diagnosis of neonatal diabetes, November 2014–2018, were invited to participate. PARTICIPANTS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 parents of 14 children. 8 had transient neonatal diabetes: KCNJ11 (n=5), ABCC8 (n=1), 6q24 (n=2), 6 had permanent neonatal diabetes: KCNJ11 (n=4), INS (n=1), homozygous GCK (n=1). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Interviews audio recorded, transcribed and subjected to thematic content analysis. RESULTS: 3 key themes emerged: 1. Babies were extremely ill at hospital admission, with extended stays in intensive care required. 2. Identification of diabetes was not ‘standardised’ and perceived a ‘chance’ finding. 3. Adding glucose to NBS was universally considered extremely positive. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of neonatal diabetes is frequently delayed, resulting in critically ill presentation with prolonged intensive care support, additional healthcare costs and familial distress. Potential to detect hyperglycaemia earlier was universally endorsed by parents with no negative consequences identified. Although further study including a larger number of individuals is needed to confirm our findings this study provides the first evidence of acceptability of glucose testing fulfilling Wilson-Jungner criteria for implementation within the NBS programme. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7643500/ /pubmed/33148726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037312 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Shepherd, Maggie
Knight, Bridget A
Laskey, Katherine
McDonald, Timothy James
Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study
title Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study
title_full Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study
title_short Parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study
title_sort parental experiences of a diagnosis of neonatal diabetes and perceptions of newborn screening for glucose: a qualitative study
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037312
work_keys_str_mv AT shepherdmaggie parentalexperiencesofadiagnosisofneonataldiabetesandperceptionsofnewbornscreeningforglucoseaqualitativestudy
AT knightbridgeta parentalexperiencesofadiagnosisofneonataldiabetesandperceptionsofnewbornscreeningforglucoseaqualitativestudy
AT laskeykatherine parentalexperiencesofadiagnosisofneonataldiabetesandperceptionsofnewbornscreeningforglucoseaqualitativestudy
AT mcdonaldtimothyjames parentalexperiencesofadiagnosisofneonataldiabetesandperceptionsofnewbornscreeningforglucoseaqualitativestudy