Cargando…

Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system

The aim of our study was to explore the value of the 8th edition TNM staging system on evaluating the prognosis of colorectal carcinoid. Colorectal carcinoid patients between 1988 and 2015 were selected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database for analysis. About 42...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Piqing, Chen, Chunhua, Wang, Zhan, Zhang, Xukun, Hu, Wenxin, Hu, Zhiqian, Li, Xinxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3431
_version_ 1783606318905425920
author Gong, Piqing
Chen, Chunhua
Wang, Zhan
Zhang, Xukun
Hu, Wenxin
Hu, Zhiqian
Li, Xinxing
author_facet Gong, Piqing
Chen, Chunhua
Wang, Zhan
Zhang, Xukun
Hu, Wenxin
Hu, Zhiqian
Li, Xinxing
author_sort Gong, Piqing
collection PubMed
description The aim of our study was to explore the value of the 8th edition TNM staging system on evaluating the prognosis of colorectal carcinoid. Colorectal carcinoid patients between 1988 and 2015 were selected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database for analysis. About 4286 patients with colorectal carcinoid tumors were identified, of which were carcinoid tumor NOS (n = 1726), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (n = 1346) and other carcinoid tumor (OCT) (n = 591). Worsening 10‐year CSS rates with increasing N status, M status, and SEER historic stage were demonstrated across all three above groups (all P < .05). In carcinoid tumor NOS, significant differences in CSS were found with increasing combined 8th AJCC stages (P < .001), except for that between stage II and stage III (10‐year CSS rate: 82.6% vs 84.3%, P = .68). While combined 8th TNM stage in NEC and OTC exhibited greater separations in CSS despite on‐going overlaps between groups. For carcinoid tumor NOS, stage II (HR = 3.37; 95% CI: 0.97‐11.76), and stage III (HR = 2.09; 95% CI: 0.51‐8.66) conferred no significant difference in CSS compared with stage I, while stage IV had an increasing HR of 5.09 (95% CI: 1.08‐24.08). Although combined 8th AJCC stage had a good ability to distinguish 10‐year CSS of patients with NEC or OCT, detailed 8th AJCC stage did not seem to be applicable. Detailed 8th AJCC categories of advanced stages in all the three groups conferred increased HRs with overlapping CIs. However, in the early and middle status, HRs did not increase with the increase of stages, or there was no difference in HRs between adjacent stages. Combined 8th TNM stage was not practical for judging the survival outcomes of colorectal carcinoid tumor NOS, especially in patients with stages II and III, but it provided useful prognostic information for NEC and OCT. However, for all carcinoid tumors, the prognostic values of detailed 8th AJCC stage were not enough accurate in the clinic. More optimized staging methods should be developed and validated in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7643648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76436482020-11-13 Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system Gong, Piqing Chen, Chunhua Wang, Zhan Zhang, Xukun Hu, Wenxin Hu, Zhiqian Li, Xinxing Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research The aim of our study was to explore the value of the 8th edition TNM staging system on evaluating the prognosis of colorectal carcinoid. Colorectal carcinoid patients between 1988 and 2015 were selected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database for analysis. About 4286 patients with colorectal carcinoid tumors were identified, of which were carcinoid tumor NOS (n = 1726), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (n = 1346) and other carcinoid tumor (OCT) (n = 591). Worsening 10‐year CSS rates with increasing N status, M status, and SEER historic stage were demonstrated across all three above groups (all P < .05). In carcinoid tumor NOS, significant differences in CSS were found with increasing combined 8th AJCC stages (P < .001), except for that between stage II and stage III (10‐year CSS rate: 82.6% vs 84.3%, P = .68). While combined 8th TNM stage in NEC and OTC exhibited greater separations in CSS despite on‐going overlaps between groups. For carcinoid tumor NOS, stage II (HR = 3.37; 95% CI: 0.97‐11.76), and stage III (HR = 2.09; 95% CI: 0.51‐8.66) conferred no significant difference in CSS compared with stage I, while stage IV had an increasing HR of 5.09 (95% CI: 1.08‐24.08). Although combined 8th AJCC stage had a good ability to distinguish 10‐year CSS of patients with NEC or OCT, detailed 8th AJCC stage did not seem to be applicable. Detailed 8th AJCC categories of advanced stages in all the three groups conferred increased HRs with overlapping CIs. However, in the early and middle status, HRs did not increase with the increase of stages, or there was no difference in HRs between adjacent stages. Combined 8th TNM stage was not practical for judging the survival outcomes of colorectal carcinoid tumor NOS, especially in patients with stages II and III, but it provided useful prognostic information for NEC and OCT. However, for all carcinoid tumors, the prognostic values of detailed 8th AJCC stage were not enough accurate in the clinic. More optimized staging methods should be developed and validated in the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7643648/ /pubmed/32897004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3431 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Gong, Piqing
Chen, Chunhua
Wang, Zhan
Zhang, Xukun
Hu, Wenxin
Hu, Zhiqian
Li, Xinxing
Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system
title Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system
title_full Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system
title_fullStr Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system
title_short Prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition TNM staging system
title_sort prognostic significance for colorectal carcinoid tumors based on the 8th edition tnm staging system
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3431
work_keys_str_mv AT gongpiqing prognosticsignificanceforcolorectalcarcinoidtumorsbasedonthe8theditiontnmstagingsystem
AT chenchunhua prognosticsignificanceforcolorectalcarcinoidtumorsbasedonthe8theditiontnmstagingsystem
AT wangzhan prognosticsignificanceforcolorectalcarcinoidtumorsbasedonthe8theditiontnmstagingsystem
AT zhangxukun prognosticsignificanceforcolorectalcarcinoidtumorsbasedonthe8theditiontnmstagingsystem
AT huwenxin prognosticsignificanceforcolorectalcarcinoidtumorsbasedonthe8theditiontnmstagingsystem
AT huzhiqian prognosticsignificanceforcolorectalcarcinoidtumorsbasedonthe8theditiontnmstagingsystem
AT lixinxing prognosticsignificanceforcolorectalcarcinoidtumorsbasedonthe8theditiontnmstagingsystem