Cargando…
Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz261 |
_version_ | 1783606324052885504 |
---|---|
author | Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo Parra-Avila, Idalia Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto Criollo-Mora, Elia Arreola-Guerra, José M Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E Sifuentes-Osornio, José |
author_facet | Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo Parra-Avila, Idalia Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto Criollo-Mora, Elia Arreola-Guerra, José M Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E Sifuentes-Osornio, José |
author_sort | Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine, it does not require adjustment for renal function for single dose prophylaxis. METHODS: RTRs were recruited into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive one 4 g dose of FOS disodium intravenously 3 h (FOS group) or placebo (placebo group) before placement and removal of a urinary catheter and before removal of a double-J ureteral stent. All participants received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The main outcome was a comparison of the mean number of symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) episodes per patient during a 7-week follow-up period. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03235947. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were included (41 in the FOS group and 41 in placebo group). The mean number of AB or symptomatic UTI episodes per patient was lower in the FOS group [intention-to-treat (ITT) 0.29 versus 0.60, P = 0.04]. The incidence of symptomatic UTI was lower in the FOS group (ITT, 7.3% versus 36.6%, P = 0.001), and there was no difference in the incidence of AB between both groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: FOS addition is an effective and safe strategy to reduce the number of symptomatic UTIs during the first 7 weeks after renal transplant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7643671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76436712020-11-12 Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo Parra-Avila, Idalia Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto Criollo-Mora, Elia Arreola-Guerra, José M Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E Sifuentes-Osornio, José Nephrol Dial Transplant Original Articles BACKGROUND: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine, it does not require adjustment for renal function for single dose prophylaxis. METHODS: RTRs were recruited into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive one 4 g dose of FOS disodium intravenously 3 h (FOS group) or placebo (placebo group) before placement and removal of a urinary catheter and before removal of a double-J ureteral stent. All participants received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The main outcome was a comparison of the mean number of symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) episodes per patient during a 7-week follow-up period. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03235947. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were included (41 in the FOS group and 41 in placebo group). The mean number of AB or symptomatic UTI episodes per patient was lower in the FOS group [intention-to-treat (ITT) 0.29 versus 0.60, P = 0.04]. The incidence of symptomatic UTI was lower in the FOS group (ITT, 7.3% versus 36.6%, P = 0.001), and there was no difference in the incidence of AB between both groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: FOS addition is an effective and safe strategy to reduce the number of symptomatic UTIs during the first 7 weeks after renal transplant. Oxford University Press 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7643671/ /pubmed/31883327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz261 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo Parra-Avila, Idalia Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto Criollo-Mora, Elia Arreola-Guerra, José M Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E Sifuentes-Osornio, José Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial |
title | Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosadocantorodrigo perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT parraavilaidalia perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT tejedamaldonadojavier perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT kauffmanortegacristopher perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT rodriguezcovarrubiasfranciscot perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT trujequematosmariedel perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT cruzmartinezrodrigo perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT maravillafrancoernesto perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT criollomoraelia perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT arreolaguerrajosem perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT moralesbuenrostroluise perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT sifuentesosorniojose perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial |