Cargando…

Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo, Parra-Avila, Idalia, Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier, Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher, Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T, Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel, Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo, Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto, Criollo-Mora, Elia, Arreola-Guerra, José M, Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E, Sifuentes-Osornio, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz261
_version_ 1783606324052885504
author Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo
Parra-Avila, Idalia
Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier
Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher
Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T
Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel
Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo
Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto
Criollo-Mora, Elia
Arreola-Guerra, José M
Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E
Sifuentes-Osornio, José
author_facet Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo
Parra-Avila, Idalia
Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier
Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher
Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T
Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel
Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo
Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto
Criollo-Mora, Elia
Arreola-Guerra, José M
Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E
Sifuentes-Osornio, José
author_sort Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine, it does not require adjustment for renal function for single dose prophylaxis. METHODS: RTRs were recruited into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive one 4 g dose of FOS disodium intravenously 3 h (FOS group) or placebo (placebo group) before placement and removal of a urinary catheter and before removal of a double-J ureteral stent. All participants received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The main outcome was a comparison of the mean number of symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) episodes per patient during a 7-week follow-up period. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03235947. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were included (41 in the FOS group and 41 in placebo group). The mean number of AB or symptomatic UTI episodes per patient was lower in the FOS group [intention-to-treat (ITT) 0.29 versus 0.60, P = 0.04]. The incidence of symptomatic UTI was lower in the FOS group (ITT, 7.3% versus 36.6%, P = 0.001), and there was no difference in the incidence of AB between both groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: FOS addition is an effective and safe strategy to reduce the number of symptomatic UTIs during the first 7 weeks after renal transplant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7643671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76436712020-11-12 Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo Parra-Avila, Idalia Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto Criollo-Mora, Elia Arreola-Guerra, José M Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E Sifuentes-Osornio, José Nephrol Dial Transplant Original Articles BACKGROUND: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine, it does not require adjustment for renal function for single dose prophylaxis. METHODS: RTRs were recruited into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive one 4 g dose of FOS disodium intravenously 3 h (FOS group) or placebo (placebo group) before placement and removal of a urinary catheter and before removal of a double-J ureteral stent. All participants received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The main outcome was a comparison of the mean number of symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) episodes per patient during a 7-week follow-up period. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03235947. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were included (41 in the FOS group and 41 in placebo group). The mean number of AB or symptomatic UTI episodes per patient was lower in the FOS group [intention-to-treat (ITT) 0.29 versus 0.60, P = 0.04]. The incidence of symptomatic UTI was lower in the FOS group (ITT, 7.3% versus 36.6%, P = 0.001), and there was no difference in the incidence of AB between both groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: FOS addition is an effective and safe strategy to reduce the number of symptomatic UTIs during the first 7 weeks after renal transplant. Oxford University Press 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7643671/ /pubmed/31883327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz261 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rosado-Canto, Rodrigo
Parra-Avila, Idalia
Tejeda-Maldonado, Javier
Kauffman-Ortega, Cristopher
Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco T
Trujeque-Matos, Mariedel
Cruz-Martínez, Rodrigo
Maravilla-Franco, Ernesto
Criollo-Mora, Elia
Arreola-Guerra, José M
Morales-Buenrostro, Luis E
Sifuentes-Osornio, José
Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
title Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz261
work_keys_str_mv AT rosadocantorodrigo perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT parraavilaidalia perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tejedamaldonadojavier perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kauffmanortegacristopher perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rodriguezcovarrubiasfranciscot perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT trujequematosmariedel perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cruzmartinezrodrigo perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT maravillafrancoernesto perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT criollomoraelia perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT arreolaguerrajosem perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT moralesbuenrostroluise perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sifuentesosorniojose perioperativefosfomycindisodiumprophylaxisagainsturinarytractinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipientsarandomizedclinicaltrial